|
jamoor
7,043 posts
84 months
|
XitUp said: jamoor said: To be fair don't these batteries wear out over time? Who will be responsible for replacing "worn" batteries? Yes. If they were out under warranty then whoever sold you the car is responsible. I think most have a ten year warranty. Also, this may just be a rumour, but I've heard bits of car engines can wear out over time too! jamoor said: It's not one I would face, but I don't accept that it's not one that many people face all the time.
Also, who will pay for your car towing because you ran out of electric? Any breakdown company will LOL in your face.
So now we have 1) Overpriced cost of the car in the first place 2) Car rentals every month because your car doesn't go further than 35 miles from home. 3) Towing Fees every time you go 37 miles from home, or get stuck in crawling traffic for 3 hours (do these cars have urban and extra urban ranges?)
not looking good is it? No wonder they don't sell any. As I said, get an AA membership if you think it's going to be an issue. Or, don't use the car for trips that it doesn't have the range for. 1)Compared to what? You can spec a diesel Golf up to cost more. 2)It has a range of 70+ miles, not 35. 3) See above. Globs said: Wrong. Nuclear has the 500,000 year waste issue, but ignoring that it's still expensive (energy hungry) to mine the ore and run the plants. Then you get part load inefficiencies. Then transmission losses to the user's socket. Then another 20% goes bye-bye in the charging circuit, and about 10-20% in the battery charge cycle. Then the car power electronics - another 10-20%. Then the traction motors - 10-30%.
Electric is pretty inefficient - sorry. It is pretty inefficient, yet nothing like as inefficient as an ICE. Simple fact, sorry. It's cute that you buy into the Greenpeace nuclear horror story though. Oh I meant on the batter exchange programme thingy, you would recieve a battery in different conditions every time surely? AA memberships don't cover you running out of energy, they are there for mechanical breakdown  Call them and check! Also it does have a range of 35 miles from home, because you have to come back too, 35 miles there, 35 miles back.
|
|
|
XitUp
7,690 posts
73 months
|
Yeah, the battery swapping thing is a stupid idea. I never championed it.
In that case, don't run out of charge. Or, get towed to a fast charge point. I'm sure if it becomes a big problem the AA/RAC/etc will start getting a few trucks with fast chargers on them.
Yes, 35 miles if you don't have anywhere to charge it when you get there. You'd be an idiot though if you drove 70 miles without thinking about where to charge. If you're an idiot, this is a problem, if you're not, it's not.
|
|
|
eldar
6,996 posts
65 months
|
XitUp said: Yeah, the battery swapping thing is a stupid idea. I never championed it.
In that case, don't run out of charge. Or, get towed to a fast charge point. I'm sure if it becomes a big problem the AA/RAC/etc will start getting a few trucks with fast chargers on them.
Yes, 35 miles if you don't have anywhere to charge it when you get there. You'd be an idiot though if you drove 70 miles without thinking about where to charge. If you're an idiot, this is a problem, if you're not, it's not. You are assuming that there will be an available charge point....
|
|
|
XitUp
7,690 posts
73 months
|
Yes, I am.
As there are very few EVs on our roads right now there probably will be. When this changes, they will add more. (And probably start charging you to use them too)
|
|
|
off_again
8,984 posts
103 months
|
Was in Amsterdam a few weeks ago. A local taxi was one of those Nissan Leaf things. Anyway, clearly its not the size of a Merc S-class, so expectations about space are reasonable. Anyway, cue 3 (was going to be 4, but clearly they would never fit) German businessmen and their overnight luggage - nothing big, just a couple of small bags and thats it. Luggage wouldnt fit in the boot and needed to go on the front seat and the three blokes squeezed in the back was funny! Practical? Err not quite. Focus is bigger, roomier, more practical and can carry 4 with luggage. Oh, and doesnt the Focus come with super economical engine too? Ah yes, I forget.... And the last German businessman? Yep, he waited 5 minutes and took the Merc S-class that came around the corner. Last laugh maybe? 
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
thinfourth2
23,612 posts
73 months
|
MMmmm
Small car in not suited to being a taxi shocker
Must be because it is electric
|
|
|
Hunky Dory
835 posts
74 months
|
thinfourth2 said: MMmmm
Small car in not suited to being a taxi shocker
Must be because it is electric 
|
|
|
Fast Bug
633 posts
30 months
|
Globs said: Show me someone who has paid for one of those. EVER. Wow you really are an idiot aren't you? I've been catching up on this thread and most of it is you casting aside every valid argument like a school bully but I digress. I used to sell LDV's in a past life, from time of delivery to irate phone call I had a customers engine go pop in under 45 minutes... I now work for Renault and sell electric vehicles to companies, and guess what? People are buying them! Shocking news to you I know, I've not sold 100's (yet), but I've a lot of people taking week long demos and placing orders. In fact I can't get a Fluence out of Renault for at least 2 months as their ones are all booked up. Electric vehicles aren't for everyone, Renault, Nissan, GM and every other manufacturer know this. However, people scoffed when the first cars were launched, there were no petrol stations, a horse is faster etc. It's not going to take all of the petrol and diesel car sales away, but it's becoming more of a viable alternative. If it's not for you, fine don't buy one it really is that easy  Oh and if your battery does 'go pop' with a Renault, they'll replace it. No matter how old the car is. So if it dies in 8 years you get a new battery. Which may well have a better range than your old one. That's how serious they are about them
|
|
|
Fast Bug
633 posts
30 months
|
Globs said: Read carefully: ONE CAR. ONE CAR THAT WORKS. Oh yeah, and I forgot to say I have 2 cars as I'm a petrol head 
|
|
|
thinfourth2
23,612 posts
73 months
|
Globs said: They actually need to do it before anyone buys their cars.. So before electric cars can sell manufacturers need to build a entire network of battery change stations So in my world where people accept the cars has a limited range a nissan leaf costs about 30grand with nissan making a small profit In your world where nissan have built a huge network of battery swap stations a nissan leaf will cost about 30 million pounds with nissan making a small profit I think they will be more popular in my world Just a hunch
|
|
|
jamoor
7,043 posts
84 months
|
Fast Bug said: Wow you really are an idiot aren't you? I've been catching up on this thread and most of it is you casting aside every valid argument like a school bully but I digress. I used to sell LDV's in a past life, from time of delivery to irate phone call I had a customers engine go pop in under 45 minutes... I now work for Renault and sell electric vehicles to companies, and guess what? People are buying them! Shocking news to you I know, I've not sold 100's (yet), but I've a lot of people taking week long demos and placing orders. In fact I can't get a Fluence out of Renault for at least 2 months as their ones are all booked up. Electric vehicles aren't for everyone, Renault, Nissan, GM and every other manufacturer know this. However, people scoffed when the first cars were launched, there were no petrol stations, a horse is faster etc. It's not going to take all of the petrol and diesel car sales away, but it's becoming more of a viable alternative. If it's not for you, fine don't buy one it really is that easy  Oh and if your battery does 'go pop' with a Renault, they'll replace it. No matter how old the car is. So if it dies in 8 years you get a new battery. Which may well have a better range than your old one. That's how serious they are about them To be fair though, people are stupid. They will buy brand new 1.0 diesel ecoboxes to save £5 a week on fuel, and forget the ££££s that flow out of the tailpipe in depreciation.
|
|
|
Globs
11,753 posts
100 months
|
' XitUp said: It is pretty inefficient, yet nothing like as inefficient as an ICE. Wrong (again), look at the numbers, the internal combustion ends up more efficient. XitUp said: It's cute that you buy into the Greenpeace nuclear horror story though. There is still no solution for nuclear waste, it continues to build up each year and requires constant supervision to store safely. Using a double dose of ignorance maybe isn't the best way to support you EVphillia. The best you can say about an EV is that despite the inefficiency, huge energy cost to make and limited use some people still think they are a viable alternative in some situations. Hardly a recipe for commercial success..
|
|
|
thinfourth2
23,612 posts
73 months
|
Globs said: There is still no solution for nuclear waste, it continues to build up each year and requires constant supervision to store safely. Wales Globs said: Using a double dose of ignorance maybe isn't the best way to support you EVphillia. Oh look an insult Globs said: The best you can say about an EV is that despite the inefficiency, huge energy cost to make Fossil fuelled cars don't grow on trees and efficiency wise well to wheel are pretty much the same as an EV Globs said: limited use some people still think they are a viable alternative in some situations.
Hardly a recipe for commercial success.. Well done you get it. The current market for EVs is not to replace every single car. The market is for those that currently buy VAG diesel for the 5 mile commute to the office and for tree huggers who want to save the world by buying a huge resource hungry personnel statement. In the UK 1.94 million cars were sold last year even 1% of that market isn't to be sniffed at
|
|
|
XitUp
7,690 posts
73 months
|
Globs said: Wrong (again), look at the numbers, the internal combustion ends up more efficient. Go on then, show us your figures. Globs said: There is still no solution for nuclear waste, it continues to build up each year and requires constant supervision to store safely. There is, stick it in big bunkers. Not a lot gets made every year. Far less than the crap that gets pumped out of other power stations and cars/trucks/buses.
|
|
|
Globs
11,753 posts
100 months
|
Plus the risk of spontaneous combustion and burning ones house down (possibly with oneself + family) appears rather higher.
Model (RC) Lipo packs very occasionally do this, I had not appreciated that scaling up the risk (surface area + power) is a very real issue.
Trying to charge them up in 30 minutes (or any fast charging) will greatly increase this risk, as for charging overnight in the garage... ..charging is the time of greatest risk of battery fire for lithium batteries.
I'm not getting sold on these cars...
|
|
|
thinfourth2
23,612 posts
73 months
|
Globs said: Plus the risk of spontaneous combustion and burning ones house down (possibly with oneself + family) appears rather higher.
Model (RC) Lipo packs very occasionally do this, I had not appreciated that scaling up the risk (surface area + power) is a very real issue.
Trying to charge them up in 30 minutes (or any fast charging) will greatly increase this risk, as for charging overnight in the garage... ..charging is the time of greatest risk of battery fire for lithium batteries.
I'm not getting sold on these cars... Firstly In globworld 3 people in the UK have a garage so this isn't really a problem. In petrol head world the fun car would be kept in the garage while the boring car is left outside in the rain Secondly Its not exactly unheard of for the electrical bits in a fossil fuelled car to catch fire Thirdly You aren't forced to buy one so why worry
|
|
|
Apache
38,250 posts
153 months
|
Has anyone any experience of the Vauxhall Ampera? they claim a range of 300 miles
|
|
|
thinfourth2
23,612 posts
73 months
|
Apache said: Has anyone any experience of the Vauxhall Ampera? they claim a range of 300 miles Pass Its not actually an electric car Its a serial hybrid or in other words an electric car with a built in generator so you get about 30 miles on the batteries and as far as you want if you keep refilling the petrol tank Also know as the chevy volt
|
|
|
LooneyTunes
2,439 posts
27 months
|
thinfourth2 said: Leave home with 95% charge
Arrive at shopping nirvana with 30% charge and plug in
Shop for 4 to 5 hours without killing yourself or anyone else
Go back to car which has 80% charge
Drive home
And that is with the tech you can buy off the shelf today
Infact my local shopping centre has free charging points Assuming: 1) There is a charging bay free (the argument about "they'll put more in when there are more EVs doesn't really account for the inconsiderate folk who'll invariably park regular cars in them - after all, nobody ignores disabled / kiddie parking spaces do they?). You're rather screwed if there isn't one... 2) You're happy to spend 4-5 hours in one of those places (i.e. you've not just gone there knowing what you're going to buy and buying it). I can think of few things worse. As a result, wouldn't even consider an EV unless I knew I could get to our usual destinations and back again. However, a 100 genuine range (including a bit of motorway, with the heater on) would probably get me interested in a "pure" EV...
|
|
|
Captain Muppet
5,970 posts
134 months
|
Globs said: Plus the risk of spontaneous combustion and burning ones house down (possibly with oneself + family) appears rather higher.
Model (RC) Lipo packs very occasionally do this, I had not appreciated that scaling up the risk (surface area + power) is a very real issue.
Trying to charge them up in 30 minutes (or any fast charging) will greatly increase this risk, as for charging overnight in the garage... ..charging is the time of greatest risk of battery fire for lithium batteries.
I'm not getting sold on these cars... Did you see in the news that woman who set herself on fire with petrol in her own kitchen? Have you seen those pictures of Ferraris on fire? I have no data on the risk of fire of EVs compared to fossil fuel vehicles, but neither is risk free. Although I already have high voltage electricity in my house, and I've hardly died at all, despite using electricity to light my gas stove and recharge battery packs in my lap-top on my lap. Also, and I hate to ask for a third time, which is the standard torch battery? You said several pages ago that there is one and based quite a bit of EV battery ranting on it (including calling the engineers of current EVs retards), so I was wondering exactly which of the following commercially available batteries is the standard one: AAA, AA, C, D, that funny square 9 volt one or those little watch type batteries. Which one of those is the standard torch battery? Also do you realise that even for a "standard" AA battery there isn't a standard voltage, or even a standard cell chemistry?
|
|