RE: SOTW: Volvo 480 Turbo

RE: SOTW: Volvo 480 Turbo

Author
Discussion

tomoleeds

770 posts

187 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
i used to really like these and as a motor trader is one of the few cars i did not get round to buy and sell.
very rare now, I did not remember only 120bhp, back then that was enough, now its standard on the smallest cars and 225bhp upwards is easily available on mtd range sporty cars

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
BalhamBadger said:
I have always liked these, top shed.
Me too, yet I don't know why.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

218 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
I thought 'M' registered cars were 94-95, rather than '96?

Zircon

305 posts

182 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
I quite like these - would be a good obscure daily driver.

110bhp from a Turbo engine in this size of car? Piss poor that is!!!

J4CKO

41,677 posts

201 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
All these mentions of "Daf" reminded me of some trivia,



The name for eighties/early nineties band "The New Fast Automatic Daffodils" were taken from the promotional material for the cars, they got lumped in with the Baggy/Madchester thing but weren't really of that ilk, this was their main track and very distinctive it is too (John Peel moment there), remember cruising to this in my MK1 Golf GTi.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkDhJ_m9XXI

Oh, and good, leftfield shedding there, these had an upmarket image at the time, quite classy, usually 30 something professional women, if the Scirroco wasnt the Scirroco of its day it would be the Scirroco of its day biggrin

Edited by J4CKO on Friday 27th April 12:13

moskvich427

227 posts

176 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
I thought 'M' registered cars were 94-95, rather than '96?
Me too. Unless it's got a rather lame private plate on it, that can't be right.

Matt UK

17,745 posts

201 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
W108 said:
Brilliant shed

Pop up headlights, 900BHP, small turbo lump, manual, £500. This truly is the recipe for the car of the future!
Very impressive power.

Hub

6,447 posts

199 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
I like these, though it probably stems from a childhood spent in Volvo dealers in the 80s whole my family bought or serviced a line of 340s! They were never that popular, seen as ugly at the time, had electrical glitches, and probably a bit underpowered and not very sporty... but I'd have considered one!

forzaminardi

2,290 posts

188 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
I've always had a soft spot for these, not sure why. They are one of the few cars to look good with a two-tone paint job too.

Martin 480 Turbo

604 posts

188 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
I just rated this one "10".
Mileage is not a problem with these. Carelessness is.
Electrics had been fixed with the S2 model. Eratic
idle is the "idle valve": German Quality "Bosch" product...
clean or replace it.

Martin 480 Turbo

Whiters

364 posts

240 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
These were new out around the time we went to pick up my Dad's new 360GLT from Newton-le-Willows Volvo in the late 80's. They seemed so out of place with everything else in the showroom. Obviously Dad had bought the wrong car, but he wouldn't listen.

If I needed a cheap knock-around for a few months, I could think of far worse to tax. Just under 120hp though, not 110.

Got me looking, as shed often does, at what else is out there with these. I must have missed this limited edition Citroen collaboration. Must have swapped out the Renault engine wink

http://www.slmotorcars.co.uk/used-volvo-480--black...

Domf

286 posts

156 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
Made at the former DAF factory in the Netherlands that went on to make the V40 (and the Mitsu Carisma) - now NedCar
Yes I worked at Philips (Sittard) next to Nedcar in the mid 90's and all the local Dutch drove 440-480's or the older DAF 33's. Unfortunately the Southern Netherlands doesn't have the adverse weather of Sweden (240-740 etc were built), my personal belief in the build quality and rust relates to location of build. Upto a few years ago Southern European cars were never really noted for rust proofing! and yes the south of the Netherlands isn't Southern Europe but's certainly not Northern Sweden!

Ewan S

1,295 posts

228 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
I'd rather have my old Honda Accord Aerodeck back (also a 3 door with pop up headlamps)

Mine was frankly amazing and the perfect car for an 18 year old (despite having the fairly grunty 2 litre fuel injection engine).

RemyMartin

6,759 posts

206 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
Didn't they have a badge on these that ?said Lambda turbo, with a lambda character

Nigel_O

2,910 posts

220 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
Hammerhead said:
Ovlov factoid: Turbo was rated at 120bhp, not 110 as stated in the original article. The ES was rated at 109bhp for the 1.7 lump.
I remember hinking that these we nicely left-field at the time, but when I found that "Turbo" meant an additional dozen or so bhp, I was badly let down.

At least the other turbo cars of the era (Maestro/Montego, Audi Quattro, Renault 21, Escort RS etc etc) managed to get a useful gain from bolting a blower on. Heck, even my Metro Turbo managed a healthy 90-something bhp from its blown A-series compared with 60-ish from the N/A lump.

Still - it's a rare car now (around 130 left in the UK), so from that perspective alone, its worthy of joining the hallowed ranks of SOTW

B'stard Child

28,454 posts

247 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
B10 said:
B'stard Child said:
BoxyWedgey but good

Just like a previous Ph'r said earlier a mate of mine had one and it looked cooler than a penguins nadger. It didn't drive so well and if the article is correct with 110 bhp I'm not surprised biggrin

My mate replaced his with a TR78 - wedgey with pop up lights, drop top and a Rover V8 under the hood.

I prefered the Volvo hehe
Surely you mean bonnet.
Nope I mean hood (Rover V8 was Buick based wasn't it wink)

W108

54 posts

182 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
Matt UK said:
W108 said:
Brilliant shed

Pop up headlights, 900BHP, small turbo lump, manual, £500. This truly is the recipe for the car of the future!
Very impressive power.
I thought so. Stated top speed of 201mph is not to be sniffed at either.

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

209 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
mardell100 said:
love them smile that's a bargain! mines done 156k and is running 17psi and is still going strong smile

hehe Love that, very cool!

Martin 480 Turbo

604 posts

188 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
Those "weak" 120Hp result out of Volvo and Porsche
collaborating on one of the first "soft" Turbos.
Resulting not so much in a spike of HP but in a
broad, usable band of torques.

Those soft turbos are all the rage now for the reduction of
fuel consumption and emissions. Only Volvo and SAab
did it back then, but it didn't catch on, obviously.


NGK210

2,993 posts

146 months

Friday 27th April 2012
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
... Good, leftfield shedding there, these had an upmarket image at the time, quite classy, usually 30 something professional women ...
In the early 90s, an ex-GF lived in the same square as Ben Elton, he owned a black 480...