School Transportation of P1's

School Transportation of P1's

Author
Discussion

Lucas Ayde

3,566 posts

169 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
horton said:
Agreed.
I work in an school and I have given kids lifts home when they are sick, there is heavy rain, etc...
The parents thank me for doing them a favour and have never complained.
WHAT! Obviously they are negligent parents to allow their little snowflakes to be exposed to such danger! biggrin

You seriously have to wonder where the modern neurosis in British society over the 'safety' of kids from an array of very unlikely dangers comes from. I personally think it's a mixture of guilt (for not devoting enough quality time) and insecurity (they feel that the kids are reflections of them). Whatever it is, it's widespread and making teachers lives hell.

Saabhonda

Original Poster:

3 posts

144 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Hi, Thanks for all your comments.

I have no plan to SUE anybody and if that was the plan I would not have taken out an advert on the WWW.

The point about the wheels was if the car is insured thru the school has it been declared that the car has been modified. Thus invalidating the insurance.

For the non parents amongst you P1 stands for Primary 1 ( 5-6 years old ).

Again thanks for all the response........





mattnunn

14,041 posts

162 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Saabhonda said:
Hi All,

My 5 year old was going on his first school trip, There are 19 kids in the class and so the school decided it would be a good idea to use 2 of the teachers own cars as the mini bus was full. My child ended up in the back seat with 2 other children with no booster/child seats. The car was a 02 Clio with non standard alloy wheels and driven by an older teacher.

We are not impressed and have approached the school head teacher who was very sorry.

My Q is what is the law surrounding the transportation of school children??????????


Thanks Nick

P.S this is my first post.....
I suspect, based on your needless over usage of question marks, that you need to get a grip.

No one came to any harm.

If anything you need to open a can of whoop arse on your kid for not being at the front of the queue for the bus.

Dracoro

8,685 posts

246 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Saabhonda said:
For the non parents amongst you P1 stands for Primary 1 ( 5-6 years old ).
And for the the non-petrolheads amongst you, P1 stand for a Subaru winkbiggrin

Parsnip

3,122 posts

189 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Bayerischer said:
St John Smythe said:
Bayerischer said:
Jamie VTS said:
benjj said:
Yes, absolutely. Do you have kids?
No I did however spend 18 years being one.
Its a little different. Come back to this thread when you have kids. until then f**k off
Sounds like you are also suffering from the benjj 'absolutely fking apoplectic with rage' syndrome smile
I would be absolutely fking apoplectic with rage. And of all of the dumbf**k comments I've seen on this site, that was by far the most moronic
Normally I would say avoid feeding the troll, but with the way this is going, I am actually curious to see if it is possible to kill someone over the internet by winding them up to the point of a massive coronary.

Bayerischer, how about you have a nice sit down and a cup of tea, relax and stop making yourself look like a fool?


mattnunn

14,041 posts

162 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
I have a 5 year old, i couldn't give a fk if the school bungied her to the back of the bus, as long as she came to no harm.

I suspect those who get wound up by a lack of health and safety will in 10 minutes time be getting wound up by health and safety legislation that impinges on their lives and decrying the compensation culture.

horton

804 posts

253 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Lucas Ayde said:
WHAT! Obviously they are negligent parents to allow their little snowflakes to be exposed to such danger! biggrin

You seriously have to wonder where the modern neurosis in British society over the 'safety' of kids from an array of very unlikely dangers comes from. I personally think it's a mixture of guilt (for not devoting enough quality time) and insecurity (they feel that the kids are reflections of them). Whatever it is, it's widespread and making teachers lives hell.
Luckily, I don't live/work in UK.
I am also allowed to pat kids on the back without because arrested for being a pedo.
I have given kids a slap round the back of the head without being arrested for beating kids.

TonyRPH

12,977 posts

169 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Obviously the teacher(s) / school were trying to avoid disappointing the child / children by giving them a lift in the car.

I'm sure the OP would have been on here complaining just as vigorously had their child been denied the school trip to due lack of spaces on the official transport.

Typically, the schools / teachers just can't win.




EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Saabhonda said:
Hi, Thanks for all your comments.

I have no plan to SUE anybody and if that was the plan I would not have taken out an advert on the WWW.

The point about the wheels was if the car is insured thru the school has it been declared that the car has been modified. Thus invalidating the insurance.

For the non parents amongst you P1 stands for Primary 1 ( 5-6 years old ).

Again thanks for all the response........
What an oddly detached way to describe your children, is there another reason you took so much interest in potential insurance payouts?

Baz Tench

5,648 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
This thread is priceless (in places).

I remember three or four of us being taken on a school trip in our teachers early VW Beetle. I was in the front, and we got there quite safely. Another time we were on a trip to the Peak District and the school minibus we were in did actually have a crash when we were on our way home.

An old Cortina (which turned out to be on bold tyres), clipped somebody else, then came spinning across the road and collided with us. Our Transit 'bus had two long bench seats running alongside the full length of the side panels with no seat belts (early eighties model), which collapsed on impact. I hurt my hip and someone else got water on the knee, nothing more serious than that.

So, I can sort of see both sides of the argument, but I do think parents get a bit too hysterical these days. I blame that there Internet for heightening awareness a tad too much......

DannyScene

6,637 posts

156 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
DJC said:
Bayerischer said:
Its a little different. Come back to this thread when you have kids. until then f**k off
rofl

I have ultimate health and safety responsibility for many, many children.

I am not a parent.

Am I allowed to have a view?
apparently not

Until you have a child....Until you have a child you cannot possibly know!

Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Of course people who aren’t parents can post an opinion.
But it’s about as relevant as me posting an opinion on the handling of a Cayman even though I’ve never actually driven one.

I think most of those with kids have some sympathy for the OP insofar as they would be wary of letting an unknown driver in an unknown car drive their children around.

It’s one thing to have a kid given a lift by a known teacher in their Volvo.
It’s quite another to be told after the fact that your kid got a lift by some random teacher in a chaved up corsa.

There are too many people jumping on this thread because they want to be part of a pack of wolves and not enough of them are equipped to consider what it means to be a parent.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

246 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Bayerischer said:
Its a little different. Come back to this thread when you have kids. until then f**k off
I don't think people with kids should be allowed to discuss anything to do with them - they're obviously far too emotionally disturbed.

The Wookie

13,964 posts

229 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
benjj said:
CampDavid said:
So if you're kid was killed you'd worry about the payout?

Seriously, that pretty much sums up everything that's wrong with society
If you change that around a bit you end up with the justification of pretty much every insurance dodger out there. Nice work.
Hang on a tic, how do you work that one out?

Frankly the answer is mute anyway, because as far as I'm aware even if said teacher hadn't declared a bloody V8 engine conversion, let alone a set of poxy alloy wheels, then any third party claims could still be made against his insurance with the only question as to whether the insurance would then seek to reclaim those costs from the policy holder.

Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
mattnunn said:
I have a 5 year old, i couldn't give a fk if the school bungied her to the back of the bus, as long as she came to no harm.
And what if she did come to harm?

(I know that's a horrible thing to suggest about your kid, and it’s not a nice thing for you to consider.)
But would it not be tragic if your kid was badly injured in a car crash because of a lack of proper seating in a car crash that was caused by a near blind 55 year old teacher going the wrong way up a sliproad in their badly maintained car.

Imagine a situation where if you met the driver or saw the car you would not let your kid into it. But the school decided it was safe.
I would imagine you’d be livid that the school allowed it to happen.


It’s one thing to give a single kid a lift home.
It’s quite another to bundle three kids into a car and take off on a school trip.


KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

176 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
DJC said:
rofl

I have ultimate health and safety responsibility for many, many children.

I am not a parent.

Am I allowed to have a view?
I don't think any one is saying your not allowed a view, but looking after children, is not the same as having your own.

As for the OP, I am with him, if it was my son, I would be asking the school, how they came to arrange a school trip without having a coach big enough for all the children.

And for all those saying "nothing happened so what you worrying about", do we have to wait till something goes wrong before complaining to the school about the mistake they have made?

Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
The Wookie said:
Frankly the answer is mute anyway,
You mean "Moot".
tongue out

DanDC5

18,807 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
It’s one thing to have a kid given a lift by a known teacher in their Volvo.It’s quite another to be told after the fact that your kid got a lift by some random teacher in a chaved up corsa.
So putting some alloy wheels on a car now makes it chavved up in your mind does it? You are aware of wht website you're posting on aren't you?

Jamie VTS

1,238 posts

148 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
Of course people who aren’t parents can post an opinion.
But it’s about as relevant as me posting an opinion on the handling of a Cayman even though I’ve never actually driven one.

I think most of those with kids have some sympathy for the OP insofar as they would be wary of letting an unknown driver in an unknown car drive their children around.

It’s one thing to have a kid given a lift by a known teacher in their Volvo.
It’s quite another to be told after the fact that your kid got a lift by some random teacher in a chaved up corsa.

There are too many people jumping on this thread because they want to be part of a pack of wolves and not enough of them are equipped to consider what it means to be a parent.
Again it was a teacher from the childs school who was trying to do a good thing to ensure the child could go on the school trip, in all probabilities driving a modest renault clio not a chaved corsa. Im not a parent - I do however work with children (outdoor activity instructor) so I am responsible for 100's of childrens lives every single day. I have as much "right" to post on topics involving children as anyone else, as someone above has posted prehaps it is the case that by being a parent you are infact not in a position to give a fair and reasonable assesment of the situation?

Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Jamie VTS said:
as someone above has posted prehaps it is the case that by being a parent you are infact not in a position to give a fair and reasonable assesment of the situation?
Which is as absurd as saying that only those that don’t drive should be allowed to decide on the laws of the road.

I understand you are in charge of a load of kids and have their wellbeing as your responsibility.
Assuming that 3 kids around the age of 5 needed to be transported from one place to another would you let one of your staff drive them in their own car without booster seats.
Do you have any staff who you wouldn’t let drive them because you couldn’t vouch for their driving skills?