Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1
3
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

srob

6,667 posts

108 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Major Fallout said:
The problem is some parts of the EU do have restrictions on old cars. I also voted no for the free road tax.

If we don't pay road tax and we don't have an MOT, we don't really get a vote. It would be ever so easy to say that group of car is banned from city centres and only to be used at weekends.

Its not difficult to get a pre 1960 through an MOT.

By the way I own 4 pre 1920 cars and work on a lot of others, so I should have my chance to speak my mind.
We've got around 20 old motorbikes, about 12 of which will be exempt (mainly 1920s) now and bar one or two that are work in progress (like this one http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0... the majority are on the road, or can be on the road at any time. Living in a fairly rural location though, means that trying to get to the MOT testing place that can actually do vintage bikes means a ~45 mile round trip, most of which is on the main roads and is horrible.

I agree to a point that this may be seen as a kick in the teeth as far as having a voice is concerned, but it's not something I actually think will happen. There's some pretty 'big' names (Lord Montague for example) that are classic/vintage enthusiasts. The UK is also eccentric enough to allow things like the London to Brighton run to carry on, when I'm sure that many nanny countries wouldn't. I spent quite a bit of time in Australia, living at my cousin's house - he has about 25 vintage bikes and whilst they're not supposed to ride anytie except on organise events, every club in every town organises an 'event' every weekend, so it doesn't really make any difference to him!

What has really got up my nose about all of the threads on here is that I suspect many of the nay-sayers, don't actually know anyone that is involved with old vehicles. I am, in fact I'm hugely involved in various ways and have been for 30 years. I've never met anyone that would risk riding a dangerous bike, yet many on these threads seems to think this will be the overnight effect (even though the penalties for being caught with a dangerous vehicle will be the same the day after as the day before). It's also the case that if you didn't take good, regular care of a vintage vehicle, it would be in a dangerous state 11 months after the MOT at the moment!

Sorry, ranting now!

kambites

Original Poster:

33,209 posts

91 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
That's all very well, but I still don't see what age has to do with it. Maybe have an exemption (or at least an extension) for cars that cover less than 1000 miles a year, but why age?

srob

6,667 posts

108 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
kambites said:
That's all very well, but I still don't see what age has to do with it. Maybe have an exemption (or at least an extension) for cars that cover less than 1000 miles a year, but why age?
Because by definition, you have to look after an old vehicle! You can't leave it standing for 11 months, jump in/on it and away you go!

You need a very sound mechanical knowledge (or to pay someone who has) to keep an old vehicle on the road and reliable, the kind of knowledge that you don't need for a new car. And you don't tend to find people with a sound mechanical knowledge not bothering to check the tyres/brakes or whatever else on their pride and joy!

kambites

Original Poster:

33,209 posts

91 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
I disagree. It's perfectly possible to run, for example, an MGA as a daily driver with no more mechanical knowledge than any other car. I know several people who have, and I've run an MGB myself which isn't technologically that different.

If they'd say pre-war, I might see the point, but late 50s cars really aren't that primitive or unusable. We're not talking about side-valves and manual timing advances here!

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 23 May 18:04

srob

6,667 posts

108 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
kambites said:
I disagree. It's perfectly possible to run, for example, an MGA as a daily driver with no more mechanical knowledge than any other car. I know several people who have, and I've run an MGB myself which isn't technologically that different.

If they'd say pre-war, I might see the point, but late 50s cars really aren't that primitive or unusable. We're not talking about side-valves and manual timing advances here!

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 23 May 18:04
Well, we'll have to agree to disagree then, as my experience (and my mates) of doing it is clearly very different to yours.


Advertisement

jagracer

6,788 posts

106 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Major Fallout said:
Let me have my MOT and be on my merry way please.
You can still have your MOT, no one is stopping you, just giving you an option.

Major Fallout

4,111 posts

101 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
jagracer said:
ou can still have your MOT, no one is stopping you, just giving you an option.
Its not the safety check I want, the actual MOT is a total waste of time. But the little bit of paper saying I can use my car with no restrictions is what I want.


Maybe I'm being paranoid, but everywhere I look the government is trying to take my money or put me out of business.
So im a little nervous.

jagracer

6,788 posts

106 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Major Fallout said:
Its not the safety check I want, the actual MOT is a total waste of time. But the little bit of paper saying I can use my car with no restrictions is what I want.


Maybe I'm being paranoid, but everywhere I look the government is trying to take my money or put me out of business.
So im a little nervous.
If you're that paranoid you probably need to look at what Europe has in terms of legislation on older cars as we'll probably fall into line as we are doing this this one. Nice MGB GT BTW.

Aviz

1,326 posts

39 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Lots of lovely number plates on old cars rotting away. We can now get them off smile

benjfrst

379 posts

60 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
jagracer said:
Major Fallout said:
Its not the safety check I want, the actual MOT is a total waste of time. But the little bit of paper saying I can use my car with no restrictions is what I want.


Maybe I'm being paranoid, but everywhere I look the government is trying to take my money or put me out of business.
So im a little nervous.
If you're that paranoid you probably need to look at what Europe has in terms of legislation on older cars as we'll probably fall into line as we are doing this this one. Nice MGB GT BTW.
What does Europe have? Show me what you know and I don't?

http://www.autocar.co.uk/blogs/our-cars/mixed-feel...

pistonchris

771 posts

51 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
The only problem i can see is some dodgy car dealers making rough repairs with no fear of failing a mot.

jagracer

6,788 posts

106 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
benjfrst said:
What does Europe have? Show me what you know and I don't?
I have no idea but this latest one seems to be one of a long line of European harmonisation, what's next?

benjfrst

379 posts

60 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
jagracer said:
I have no idea but this latest one seems to be one of a long line of European harmonisation, what's next?
Restrictions.

Marquis Rex

7,377 posts

109 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
It's confirmed: England is full of pathetic pansys who NEED the nanny state and stupid rules and regulations to be hand held rather than encouraged to think and proactively act themselves.
What next? The embracing of speed cameras?

jamiebae

3,801 posts

81 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
The issue with this is not the enthusiasts who maintain their cars well, but with people who think they are maintaining their cars well. There are people who spend ages making the car look pristine, but ignore the fact that half the floorpan is rotten and there's 1/4 turn of play in each direction in the steering.

I don't need legislation and regulation to help me, but I do need it to protect me from the vast population of cretinous spcaktards who I have to share a country with. There are thousands of 'enthusiasts' who will happily drive around in something with barely functioning brakes, ruined suspension and baggy steering as long as it starts and runs.

As for people saying you can't use a pre 1960 car every day, how do you think people managed 50 years ago? With a few tweaks there are loads of late 50s cars which could be reliably used every day, and with free tax, no MoT to worry about and classic insurance I bet a lot more people will start looking at early Landies, Beetles, Anglias and other stuff.

TheEnd

12,286 posts

58 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Marquis Rex said:
It's confirmed: England is full of pathetic pansys who NEED the nanny state and stupid rules and regulations to be hand held rather than encouraged to think and proactively act themselves.
What next? The embracing of speed cameras?
Now now...


HustleRussell

4,214 posts

30 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Jamiebae- I agree. I know of old cars which never get their tyres off the ground between MOTs. I don't see the hardship in an annual check particularly with brake and fuel lines going unchecked under the car. Just like every hobby in life, some folks are better at it than others- and I don't like the thought of sharing our increasingly confined road space with cars which are in poor condition.
A lot of people are talking in miles- but miles are largely irrelevant. Parts will corrode, seize, perish etc even with zero use.

mollytherocker

7,215 posts

79 months

[news] 
Wednesday 23rd May 2012 quote quote all
Marquis Rex said:
It's confirmed: England is full of pathetic pansys who NEED the nanny state and stupid rules and regulations to be hand held rather than encouraged to think and proactively act themselves.
What next? The embracing of speed cameras?
Are you saying that you didnt already know this? Look around fella!

MTR

benjfrst

379 posts

60 months

[news] 
Thursday 24th May 2012 quote quote all
TheEnd said:
Marquis Rex said:
It's confirmed: England is full of pathetic pansys who NEED the nanny state and stupid rules and regulations to be hand held rather than encouraged to think and proactively act themselves.
What next? The embracing of speed cameras?
Now now...
Is it confirmed the 10 million UK cititizens who dont live in England NEED the nanny state and stupid rules and regulations to be hand held rather than encouraged to think and proactively act themselves?

kambites

Original Poster:

33,209 posts

91 months

[news] 
Thursday 24th May 2012 quote quote all
Marquis Rex said:
It's confirmed: England is full of pathetic pansys who NEED the nanny state and stupid rules and regulations to be hand held rather than encouraged to think and proactively act themselves.
What next? The embracing of speed cameras?
Exactly. England is full of such people which is why this change is such a damned stupid idea.

If it wasn't full of such people, we wouldn't need MoTs at all; or 90% of our other laws come-to-that.
1
3
Reply to Topic