RE: PH Carpool: Caterham 21

RE: PH Carpool: Caterham 21

Author
Discussion

northernmonkeybo

13 posts

160 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Crikey - Another Caterham from the Oxford meet...! - Nice write up Jack - Hope to see you and Emily soon!

I should add my favourite part of the car is the sills - EPIC!

Itsallicanafford

2,772 posts

160 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
...i remeber when these were launched, i though that it was a good step for Caterham but cannot work out why it did not work? I seam to remember they were priced about the same as a Elise?

car95

413 posts

193 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Lovely. Wanted one badly back at the time. Still have the brochure!

Frimley111R

15,685 posts

235 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
WillBrumBrum said:
Brilliant car. Love the looks, I know there was that thing about the Elise killing all the orders, but it's a shame because I think if Caterham had had a bit more faith in themselves at the time when this came out rather than listening to everyone who said it wasn't as good as an Elise - then it could have continued and sold a few, kind of like the Morgan +4 has done all these years.
Yep, just bad timing. IIRC the entire budget for the car was less than Lotus spent on the doors for the Elise.

Did the 21 have a roof?

blitzracing

6,392 posts

221 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
"I'm thinking of a V8-powered car, however I don't know of any which are as small, light and nimble as a 21. Would a V8 fit in, I wonder?!"

Yes its called a Ginetta g33

British Beef

2,220 posts

166 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
blitzracing said:
"I'm thinking of a V8-powered car, however I don't know of any which are as small, light and nimble as a 21. Would a V8 fit in, I wonder?!"

Yes its called a Ginetta g33
Fisher Fury's take a Rover V8 too.

Only issue with V8s in these small cars is the heat given off the exhaust, on my fury the side exit exhaust runs along the passenger side sill, with the manifold just ahead of the passenger footwell, it gets warm!

I would love a Fury type car with an M3 3.2 straight 6, only problem is the exahust would run down the drivers side on a RHD car.

Sorry slightly off subject.........

Cheib

23,287 posts

176 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Completely forgot these existed/not sure I ever knew it had made it into production.

I remember the aluminium bodied car....looked stunning and made a big impact at the time.

alexpa

644 posts

173 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
WillBrumBrum said:
Brilliant car. Love the looks, I know there was that thing about the Elise killing all the orders, but it's a shame because I think if Caterham had had a bit more faith in themselves at the time when this came out rather than listening to everyone who said it wasn't as good as an Elise - then it could have continued and sold a few, kind of like the Morgan +4 has done all these years.
Yep, just bad timing. IIRC the entire budget for the car was less than Lotus spent on the doors for the Elise.

Did the 21 have a roof?
The Elise at launch was about £16k, I cant remember the 21's price, but do remember comparing the two at the time. The Elise hands down.

Mark B

1,621 posts

266 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
St John Smythe said:
Annoyingly there isn't a pic of the rear of the car in the article. What was up with the exhausts?
Nothing serious, but the pipe split just by the rear diff to give twin exit, one either side, just inside the rear difuser styling. The 'long' pipe that went to the nearside had very little exhaust gases running through it, so looked very different to the other side. On an almost perfect design, it just looked odd after a good run. Minor issue though, they do look lovely and I am sure Caterham could relaunch and sell them now.

Watchman

6,391 posts

246 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
28th March 1999, a pub in Oxfordshire.



What happened to the headlight covers?

Another from about 5 mins later:


EliseKSK

18 posts

154 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
I fail to see why you'd want to weigh this down with a V8 - although I used to wonder whether my old ZT-T's V6 would slot into my Elise.

Watchman

6,391 posts

246 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
There are V8s and there are V8s... A Rover V8 would be terrible for this but a bike-engine-derived V8 could be fun.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Watchman said:
There are V8s and there are V8s... A Rover V8 would be terrible for this but a bike-engine-derived V8 could be fun.
Yep a V8 never did anything any good for TVR either wink

NGK210

2,966 posts

146 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Also very comfortable on a long journey - engine and road noise aside - lovely, classic reclined driving position, the door's arm-rest and transmission tunnel are at the same height, so elbows are supported perfectly and the wheel and gear stick are also ideally placed, and there's plenty of head- and leg-room.

But... the sill is very high and very wide, so getting in and out with the hood in-place is like limbo-dancing through a letter box. And the fixed windows are a major, major PITA rage

If Caterham had given the windows and the entry/exit five minutes thought, it might've actually sold a tidy few 21s idea

jamespink

1,218 posts

205 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
WillBrumBrum said:
Brilliant car. Love the looks, I know there was that thing about the Elise killing all the orders, but it's a shame because I think if Caterham had had a bit more faith in themselves at the time when this came out rather than listening to everyone who said it wasn't as good as an Elise - then it could have continued and sold a few, kind of like the Morgan +4 has done all these years.
I can confirm these are great little cars as a friend has a superb example Really well finished, tight and very lively, in fact much more Lotus than the Elise as its far lighter with a similar power output. Great fun!

WillBrumBrum

607 posts

199 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
alexpa said:
Frimley111R said:
WillBrumBrum said:
Brilliant car. Love the looks, I know there was that thing about the Elise killing all the orders, but it's a shame because I think if Caterham had had a bit more faith in themselves at the time when this came out rather than listening to everyone who said it wasn't as good as an Elise - then it could have continued and sold a few, kind of like the Morgan +4 has done all these years.
Yep, just bad timing. IIRC the entire budget for the car was less than Lotus spent on the doors for the Elise.

Did the 21 have a roof?
The Elise at launch was about £16k, I cant remember the 21's price, but do remember comparing the two at the time. The Elise hands down.
Found a Caterham 21 in the classifieds for £16k! Drool... http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3927001.htm

Watchman

6,391 posts

246 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Watchman said:
There are V8s and there are V8s... A Rover V8 would be terrible for this but a bike-engine-derived V8 could be fun.
Yep a V8 never did anything any good for TVR either wink
TVRs and Caterhams have different design requirements though. Caterhams are all about light-weight. As such the Rover V8 is a terrible idea.

The Westfield V8 was quite fun as an inbetweener design though but I still think the RV8 suits a heavier type of car.

I always wondered whether the AJP8 would have been fun in a lighter car. It's quite small.

ChimpanLucky

9,637 posts

180 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
I remember rushing to the Caterham stand at the British Motor Show in the mid nineties when they released the 21.

Eager to sample this beauty first hand I managed to blag myself a sit in the car.

Oh dear frown

As soon as I slid in I knew it wasn't for me, at over 6ft & 13.5 stone it was ridiculously cramped.

My dreams dashed I made my way over to the TVR stand and the rest is history.

The Chimaera gave me old school Cobra thrills with modern comforts sufficient to gallop across Europe in 500 mile chunks.

Don't dismiss that old Rover V8 until you've tried a well fettled TVR one.

At 1060kgs it's not exactly a heavy car and with it's Tuscan Challenge derived chassis with the addition of some decent dampers and a few other subtle mods they can handle much better that their reputation suggests.

Shame really, I loved that Caterham 21, right up to the point I sat in one rolleyes

Danny Milner

128 posts

204 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Do like these 21s; they're so diddy in the flesh. A 7 with clothes on...

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 28th May 2012
quotequote all
Watchman said:
TVRs and Caterhams have different design requirements though. Caterhams are all about light-weight. As such the Rover V8 is a terrible idea.

The Westfield V8 was quite fun as an inbetweener design though but I still think the RV8 suits a heavier type of car.

I always wondered whether the AJP8 would have been fun in a lighter car. It's quite small.
I was only jesting really... although many a lightweight car has done rather well from fitting a V8 engine. How light is the 21? I know a V8 will make it nose heavier, but I suspect such a setup would make for a very different kind of car rather than just better or worse.