|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
Bladedancer said: I don't see the point, but the gearing does depend on the engine. I my 330 6 gears are too many. There's so little difference between 5th and 6th than you could remove 5th altogether and it wouldn't make much difference. In my experience, that's the case with almost all six-speed boxes in relatively mundane cars. Even some five-speeds are the same (or the converse) - I have no wish for a sixth gear, but it'd be nice if 5th was 20% higher.
|
|
|
Bladedancer
394 posts
65 months
|
E38Ross said: 3-400rpm at what speed though? The difference between 5th and 6th is 15% which is a pre big difference. At 70mph in 5th your car must be around the 2750 rpm mark, and 6th is actually 2350 which is a fair chunk. Especially if you cruise at say 85mph, 5th would be 3350 so 2850 is a 500rpm drop.
I wouldn't call that pointless. At 70 5th has 2750RPM, 6th 2400RPM so good call. You're still missing the point. I would remove 5th gear as it is and make 6th gear become 5th while maintaining current gearing. So I'm getting the same cruising ability. What I mean is I don't need that 5th there in the current setup. I just hardly ever use it. 4 and 6 are geared perfectly for me and I don't need anything in between. And with 5th gone, my box becomes a 5 speeder 
|
|
|
Bladedancer
394 posts
65 months
|
kambites said: In my experience, that's the case with almost all six-speed boxes in relatively mundane cars. Even some five-speeds are the same - I have no wish for a sixth gear, but it'd be nice if 5th was 20% higher. Well, 330i isn't exactly mundane as you've put it, but I can see you do understand what I mean by saying 6 gears can be pointless.
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
Bladedancer said: E38Ross said: 3-400rpm at what speed though? The difference between 5th and 6th is 15% which is a pre big difference. At 70mph in 5th your car must be around the 2750 rpm mark, and 6th is actually 2350 which is a fair chunk. Especially if you cruise at say 85mph, 5th would be 3350 so 2850 is a 500rpm drop.
I wouldn't call that pointless. At 70 5th has 2750RPM, 6th 2400RPM so good call. You're still missing the point. I would remove 5th gear as it is and make 6th gear become 5th while maintaining current gearing. So I'm getting the same cruising ability. What I mean is I don't need that 5th there in the current setup. I just hardly ever use it. 4 and 6 are geared perfectly for me and I don't need anything in between. And with 5th gone, my box becomes a 5 speeder  well how about you add a 7th so instead of 2400rpm it's doing around 2100rpm.....that'd be nice wouldn't it. oh wait, PH wouldn't like that because it's too complicated  i get what you mean though. not you, but others on here really struggle with the fact that more gears can lead to better economy, which manufacturers are striving for, for obvious reasons. i see no problems with it at all.
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
kambites said: Bladedancer said: I don't see the point, but the gearing does depend on the engine. I my 330 6 gears are too many. There's so little difference between 5th and 6th than you could remove 5th altogether and it wouldn't make much difference. In my experience, that's the case with almost all six-speed boxes in relatively mundane cars. Even some five-speeds are the same (or the converse) - I have no wish for a sixth gear, but it'd be nice if 5th was 20% higher. that's a really, really odd comment. you're saying the ratios between the gears on "mundane" cars are different to more exotic cars? they really aren't, it's just the diff that's different in reality (ok the ratios are different but the margins aren't that much. what happens say if the engine is cold and you don't want to go above 3000rpm but don't want the engine to labour. you join the motorway, hit say 2800rpm rpm in 4th then go to change into 5th and then suddenly you're at less than 2000rpm where the engine may be labouring....you think that's better than going from say 2800rpm, then down to 2400rpm, back up gently to 2800rpm again and then into a 6th. that's just 1 scenario but you get the point. having more ratios, well spaced is better than less ratios with the same spacing for the 1st few gears and then a huge jump to the last gear. it just is.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
Bladedancer said: kambites said: In my experience, that's the case with almost all six-speed boxes in relatively mundane cars. Even some five-speeds are the same - I have no wish for a sixth gear, but it'd be nice if 5th was 20% higher. Well, 330i isn't exactly mundane as you've put it, but I can see you do understand what I mean by saying 6 gears can be pointless. Depends on your point of view, I suppose - it's a mass produced family car, but I suppose it's a moderately powerful one. ETA: But yes I know exactly what you mean; I don't know if I've ever actually used 5th on the wife's Octavia.
|
|
|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
E38Ross said: that's a really, really odd comment. you're saying the ratios between the gears on "mundane" cars are different to more exotic cars? they really aren't, it's just the diff that's different in reality (ok the ratios are different but the margins aren't that much. Who cares what the actual ratios in the box are? It's the final drive ratio of each gear that matters, unless you sit there counting how many times your prop shaft has gone 'round. If you're going to cruise at 200mph, I can certainly see the point in having 7 gears to get there; if your car has a top speed of 120, I can't really see the point in having more than five, to be honest. When the engine is cold and I don't want to go above 3000rpm, I also don't want to use more than about 1/3 throttle either, so generally I just drive slowly. My engine is warm before I can get to the nearest dual carriageway. 
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
kambites said: Who cares what the actual ratios in the box are? you, clearly, because you said your 5th was taller. if you don't want to use more than 1/3 throttle then having smaller differences between the gears is better for the engine, thus more ratios is better.....no?
|
|
|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
E38Ross said: kambites said: Who cares what the actual ratios in the box are? you, clearly, because you said your 5th was taller. if you don't want to use more than 1/3 throttle then having smaller differences between the gears is better for the engine, thus more ratios is better.....no? No I don't, I care what the final drive ratios in each gear are. I want fifth gear to be taller - I couldn't care less whether that's by making fifth gear longer or by making every other gear shorter and changing the diff; I wouldn't even be able to tell the difference between the two approaches. I'm by no means saying there aren't some advantages to having more gears; just that I believe they are outweighed by the disadvantages. Obviously from a purely theoretical standpoint, a CVT is the perfect solution, although I don't know how you'd set up the control mechanism. From a purely theoretical standpoint though, any kind of manual control is rather pointless.
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
kambites said: E38Ross said: kambites said: Who cares what the actual ratios in the box are? you, clearly, because you said your 5th was taller. if you don't want to use more than 1/3 throttle then having smaller differences between the gears is better for the engine, thus more ratios is better.....no? No I don't, I care what the final drive ratios in each gear are. I want fifth gear to be taller - I couldn't care less whether that's by making fifth gear longer or by making every other gear shorter and changing the diff; I wouldn't even be able to tell the difference between the two approaches. you would be able to tell the difference, trust me.
|
|
|
Max_Torque
4,836 posts
86 months
|
[dibnah]
Bl**dy kids of t'day, with you're poncy multispeed transmissions, don't know when you're born you lot do yoooou. In mi day we only had 2 speeds, and non of that unecessary new fangled synchromesh gubbins neither. Twooooo gears, soo difficult to drive you'd often be competely killed to death just attempting to pick up missis from t'Bingo of an evenin. but, bi eck, when you got it just right like, son, let me tell you, t were like that colliery bass band hitting the high notes in perfect time, music to a workin mans ears, grand it were, grand! 'course, it were all just solid brass in my day, none of that silicon carbide nonsense neither...........
[/dibnah]
;-)
|
|
|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
E38Ross said: you would be able to tell the difference, trust me. How? Exactly the same revs at every speed in every gear... the only (tiny) difference would be in drive-line losses and NVH.
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
kambites said: E38Ross said: you would be able to tell the difference, trust me. How? Exactly the same revs at every speed in every gear... the only (tiny) difference would be in drive-line losses and NVH. if you made every other gear shorter and changed the diff so 1st 4 gears were shorter but 5th was taller then you're still changing 5th gear ratio. if you want a taller 5th and do so by NOT altering any of the ratios other than the diff, all gears would be taller. so the ways you've mentioned you'd still be changing a single gear ratio......which you said you don't care for.
|
|
|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
E38Ross said: if you made every other gear shorter and changed the diff so 1st 4 gears were shorter but 5th was taller then you're still changing 5th gear ratio. if you want a taller 5th and do so by NOT altering any of the ratios other than the diff, all gears would be taller. so the ways you've mentioned you'd still be changing a single gear ratio......  Yes, that's obvious? What's that got to do with anything? I said I want the final drive ratio in 1-4 the same as it is now, and the final drive ratio in fifth to be about 20% longer and that I couldn't give a damn how it's achieved. I'd be reasonably happy with a six speed box which had the same first five gears as mine and sixth 20% higher than fifth; I'd just never use fifth so it would be a bit of a waste of cogs, and slightly more awkward to change gear.
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
Kambites, do you ever use 4th or do you go from 3rd to 5th? Your car would pull it and be ok but it's not ideal in all scenarios. If on a dual carriageway and you have 6th then you hit a hill dropping to 5th would be more preferable to straight to 4th, for instance.
You can't make just 5th taller without changing that specific ratio as you know, so why you mentioned the diff ratio is don't know?
|
|
|
Bladedancer
394 posts
65 months
|
E38Ross said: Bladedancer said: E38Ross said: 3-400rpm at what speed though? The difference between 5th and 6th is 15% which is a pre big difference. At 70mph in 5th your car must be around the 2750 rpm mark, and 6th is actually 2350 which is a fair chunk. Especially if you cruise at say 85mph, 5th would be 3350 so 2850 is a 500rpm drop.
I wouldn't call that pointless. At 70 5th has 2750RPM, 6th 2400RPM so good call. You're still missing the point. I would remove 5th gear as it is and make 6th gear become 5th while maintaining current gearing. So I'm getting the same cruising ability. What I mean is I don't need that 5th there in the current setup. I just hardly ever use it. 4 and 6 are geared perfectly for me and I don't need anything in between. And with 5th gone, my box becomes a 5 speeder  well how about you add a 7th so instead of 2400rpm it's doing around 2100rpm.....that'd be nice wouldn't it. oh wait, PH wouldn't like that because it's too complicated  i get what you mean though. not you, but others on here really struggle with the fact that more gears can lead to better economy, which manufacturers are striving for, for obvious reasons. i see no problems with it at all. It would only make sense if 5th was geared like current 6th and 6th was direct, final gear. But whether that gives any benefit depends on what the last gear in particular gearbox is like.
|
|
|
VvrooomM
98 posts
50 months
|
Most cars don't need the top speed many posses so why not just reduce maximum speed to maybe 100-110 mph and then have six appropriate ratios, surely we would then be fine with six.
Super cars maybe an exception but does my 2.0 tdi golf really need to be capable of 140 mph??
|
|
|
E38Ross
Original Poster
10,515 posts
81 months
|
VvrooomM said: Most cars don't need the top speed many posses so why not just reduce maximum speed to maybe 100-110 mph and then have six appropriate ratios, surely we would then be fine with six.
Super cars maybe an exception but does my 2.0 tdi golf really need to be capable of 140 mph?? erm.....what?!
|
|
|
rohrl
3,763 posts
14 months
|
VvrooomM said: Most cars don't need the top speed many posses so why not just reduce maximum speed to maybe 100-110 mph and then have six appropriate ratios, surely we would then be fine with six.
Super cars maybe an exception but does my 2.0 tdi golf really need to be capable of 140 mph?? Do you really want to be cruising on the motorway at 5000rpm? VW used to do a 5-speed box they called the 4+E which had 4 driving gears then a very long top gear to drop the revs on the motorway which sounds like what kambites needs.
|
|
|
kambites
32,864 posts
90 months
|
E38Ross said: Kambites, do you ever use 4th or do you go from 3rd to 5th? Your car would pull it and be ok but it's not ideal in all scenarios. If on a dual carriageway and you have 6th then you hit a hill dropping to 5th would be more preferable to straight to 4th, for instance.
You can't make just 5th taller without changing that specific ratio as you know, so why you mentioned the diff ratio is don't know? I think we got onto the difference between final drive ratios and actual gearbox ratios because you asked why there would be difference between "mundane" cars and supercars. And yes, I do use fourth (albeit not very often, because it wont do 30 in 4th). I wasn't proposing moving that though.
|
|