RE: PH Blog: heart versus head

RE: PH Blog: heart versus head

Author
Discussion

TankRS

2,850 posts

154 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
good god the new 1 series is an ugly car. . . . i certainly dont think its going to get better with age either!

the front lights look too big for the front end as does everything above the lower grill, it just looks bloated in the head on pic, and the rear looks close to a DS3, and relatively slim compared to the head on view of the front scratchchin

masermartin

1,629 posts

177 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Fetchez la vache said:
Errr... i thought these new 1's were front wheel drive though...scratchchin
Nope, but I believe the platform it's built on supports both.

Schnellmann

1,893 posts

204 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Seems I am in the minority that think the revised 1 looks better, although still no looker.

135i for me rather than the Golf, if I lived in the UK. Here in Switzerland I've had a few RWD BMWs and they were a pain in the backside in the snow, even with winter tyres. So would probably take the VW.

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

218 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Its such a pretty car,



No i'm sorry i'm laughing already, please also remember those that are throwing figures around, i have yet to drive a BMW that gets near its 'quoted' figures thats performance or economy.

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
How can you look at that, like it and not be a fanboy?

Jobbo

12,972 posts

264 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
i have yet to drive a BMW that gets near its 'quoted' figures thats performance or economy.
No car gets near its official economy figures but that's not specific to BMW. And I've never heard anyone say that BMW quote faster performance figures than they can really achieve.

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

151 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Totally agree on the heart vs. head bit: IMVHO, cars today are objectively speaking so good that all of the "getting from A to B", running costs, practicality and other issues etc. are pretty much irrelevant and the "seemingly inconsequential matters of personal taste" become the really important, deciding factors.

With the two boxes discussed it would have to be the Golf, simply because I find the styling less offensive and there's otherwise not much in it.

The real winner would be an E87 130i though. How much are these in the UK at the moment? Probably less than a week of depreciation on either a new Golf or 1-Series...

Garlick

40,601 posts

240 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
How can you look at that, like it and not be a fanboy?
I love it, no idea why but I do!

TankRS

2,850 posts

154 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Garlick said:
I love it, no idea why but I do!
you sir should get your brain or eyes checked!! wink

Garlick

40,601 posts

240 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
I am (genuinely) short sighted

Leggy

1,019 posts

222 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
So right about subjectivity though. Despite how good a car might be if you don't like it's looks would you really buy it? And then be seen in it?
It's like clothing only more expensive!
The BMW is ugly it could be the best car in the world but I wouldn't be seen in one.
It's an emotive subject.

Edited by Leggy on Wednesday 27th June 22:15

Kong

1,503 posts

171 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Does anyone know why the Golf and BMW are the same price for the same performance/spec? If this was an Audi then it would make sense as they are rivals in the 'premium' sector but VW are supposed to sit below Audi.

I'm not being a badge-snob just looking at it logically.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
As with most modern BMW's they do look a lot better "in the flesh" so to speak. The 1'er is growing on me now a bit. With the right spec (wheels, Msport etc) i suspect, that like a larvae turning into a butterfly, it will pupate into a more handsome car in the next year or so! (Ok, maybe that illustration is a simile too far, but you knwo what i mean ;-) BMW are masters at making sure their new platforms with plenty of early, mid and late life cycle impluse revisions designed into them!

The other thing i notice about a lot of modern FWD hot hatches etc is that the chassis is tuned to appeal on a short test drive with pretty fast "sporting" reactions and feedback, in order to attempt to mask the physical deficiencies in the layout. The BMW's seem to be a bit of an opposite pole, perhaps feeling too refined and smooth on a short test drive, but the longer you drive one, the better it becomes. You find yourself uncovering layers of ability (rwd, better mass distribution etc) as time goes on. Effectively the rwd layout gives a more linear response, but that can feel slightly unexciting at first, especially if you have just stepped out of something like a turbo Renault or Vauxhall hot hatch.........


Chris1973

73 posts

170 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
"The simple fact that I would call myself a 'BMW man', though not a fanboy."

Riggers, I would go the other way, and the very fact that is was a BMW would stop me from chossing one in the first place. As you say, I can't explain why this this is, it just doesn't fit with me, and I guess the way I see myself! Golf in drag for me(scirocco)

I'm would call myself a VW man, though not a fanboy!

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
As with most modern BMW's they do look a lot better "in the flesh" so to speak. .
Can't agree. Saw a blue one just like this rounding a roundabout in Cardiff the other day. It looked a bit like a bathtub.

PaulieMafia

3,321 posts

223 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Wardy5 said:
PaulieMafia said:
Seconded. This four-potted future we live in makes me sad. Straight six would swing it for me too.
Absolutely. A creamy Munich straight 6 would be lovely. But it just wouldn't sell in significant enough numbers in today's climate, especially as a large amount of these will appear on fleets. It's hard enough to find fleet lists these days that will let you have anything petrol-powered.....

As the £6 unleaded gallon approachs, the fact this will do 43mpg is a pretty strong selling point; annoying as that might be!
Very true. Just offloaded my mint low mileage A3 3.2 Quattro for a criminally low price - the £6 gallon bit me on the arse! smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Max_Torque said:
As with most modern BMW's they do look a lot better "in the flesh" so to speak. .
Can't agree. Saw a blue one just like this rounding a roundabout in Cardiff the other day. It looked a bit like a bathtub.
Well as long as you don't get lumped with sitting at the end with the taps by she who must be obeyed, then i see this as a positive benefit.......... ;-)


LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Well as long as you don't get lumped with sitting at the end with the taps by she who must be obeyed, then i see this as a positive benefit.......... ;-)
That won't wash with me. wink

Leggy

1,019 posts

222 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
BMW are masters at making sure their new platforms with plenty of early, mid and late life cycle impluse revisions designed into them!
Disagree. They make an ugly car then spend the next few years trying to play catch up and improve it.

pSyCoSiS

3,598 posts

205 months

Wednesday 27th June 2012
quotequote all
I'd pick this just on the basis of being RWD, hence probably a more fun car to drive than the Golf.

I wouldn't have either, though!