One owner 1.2L Nova for a bag

One owner 1.2L Nova for a bag

Author
Discussion

forzaminardi

2,290 posts

187 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Strange, but this is the last Vauxhall I can remember vaguely liking, I think to my then 8-year old eyes, the wheel arches implied some sort of connection with an Audi Quattro, my then Best Car In The World Ever.

SeanyD

3,375 posts

200 months

Timberwolf

5,343 posts

218 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
A mate of mine once bought an original one-owner one in better condition than this (albeit higher miles) from an old lady on the Isle of Wight for £275. It was a saloon and metallic hearing aid beige with Werther's Original interior.

What he didn't trash driving like an idiot managed to self-immolate over the 3 or so years he owned it, including most of the ignition wiring melting. The car was last seen heading towards a scrapyard after increasingly desperate and bodgetastic fixes failed to stave off the onset of unroadworthiness.

Crow555

1,037 posts

194 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I saw a grey Nova just like that in Antrim at a car show, in pretty much the same condition. It seemed it was some concourse class winner, perhaps this is the same. If you were buying it for those reasons, then go ahead.

As an everyday run around, probably better looking elsewhere.

SWoll

18,373 posts

258 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Really can't see the appeal of this at all. Never a god car, even when new, and like most Vauxhall product quite incredibly dull.

Love the "daydreamers" comment from the seller as well. Who would possibly daydream about a 1.2L Nova. (Other than Garlick of course) wink

Garlick

Original Poster:

40,601 posts

240 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Who would possibly daydream about a 1.2L Nova. (Other than Garlick of course) wink
I'd rather a 1.0 4-speed Merit to be honest.

paulrussell

2,106 posts

161 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I like it apart from the mudflaps.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Also, why do people put "no timewasters" in car ads? Do they think that people will say to themselves "hell, I was going to send the guy lots of emails, and maybe even go and suck my teeth a bit and kick the tyres, and afterwards go completely silent, but as it says that, I won't"? Do ads lacking this mantra imply "timewasters especially welcome"?

wormburner

31,608 posts

253 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
£400 absolute tops. An uncharming car new, and an uncharming car used.

wackojacko

8,581 posts

190 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Garlick in a Nova .......




rofl

Kentish

15,169 posts

234 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Garlick said:
I really, really like this. Not sure if I have rose-tinted glasses on, but for £1000 this could be the ultimate city runaround...no mods, no add-ons just as Vauxhall intended.

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3999747.htm

Who needs an ADAM when you can zoom around in this? You've (probably not) been Novataken.
Pah, no!

It needs to be a nice shade of brown wink


anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I suggest that you seek a further opinion from the experts:-

http://www.autoste.co.uk/phpbb3/viewforum.php?f=...


Crow555

1,037 posts

194 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Also, why do people put "no timewasters" in car ads?
I was thinking the exact same thing the other day.

"No dreamers/tirekickers/test pilots/timewasters"
"relisted due to timewaster"
"No money, no test drive"

Honestly, those sorts of things put me off looking at a car. Do these people believe that unless they put these down on the ad that they'll forever be pestered by buyers who simply want to rake their car about? Truth is, they just sounds like knobs. Time to crossreference threads methinks.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I agree. Such words put me off viewing, as they make the vendor sound difficult.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

146 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Crow555 said:
I was thinking the exact same thing the other day.

"No dreamers/tirekickers/test pilots/timewasters"
"relisted due to timewaster"
"No money, no test drive"

Honestly, those sorts of things put me off looking at a car. Do these people believe that unless they put these down on the ad that they'll forever be pestered by buyers who simply want to rake their car about? Truth is, they just sounds like knobs. Time to crossreference threads methinks.
In a similar vein, why do people put "car is advertised elsewhere and I reserve the right to remove the auction at any time" ? I mean, who the fk cares? If it sells it sells, if it doesn't it doesn't. What is all this "rights reserving" BS?

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
The language is needlessly formal, but there is no harm in telling people that an auction might end early, as that might encourage people to bid early rather than wait for the last minutes.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

146 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
The language is needlessly formal, but there is no harm in telling people that an auction might end early, as that might encourage people to bid early rather than wait for the last minutes.
My considered opinion is that it will make fk all difference. laugh

Edited by All that jazz on Wednesday 11th July 18:32

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
You are probably right, but apparently some people get a buzz out of late bidding in online auctions.

C2james

4,685 posts

165 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Seeing as we are going to Vauxhall later this month Garlick I think you need to buy it. smile

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Get it bought! biggrin