RE: Chris Harris video: GT2 RS vs Ducati Panigale
Discussion
Afraid to say that video did nothing for me- I'm usually a huge fan of Mr Harris and his productions, but this one seemed overly artsy and a bit contrived-there didn't seem to be much in the way of substance- a 20 minute video of a few runs up Santa Pod. Dare I say it, I was a bit bored by the end. Not helped by the 'discussion' in the last few minutes which to me seemed pretty dull!
Sorry! Just being honest.
Sorry! Just being honest.
andyroo said:
great vid, superb production. keep em coming!
+1 That was proper entertainment. Amazing vehicles we'd all love to own and a couple of blokes trying to max them. I think its perfectly pitched being nerdy enough to be interesting but at the same time not taking themselves too seriously.
Harris's videos are a great addition to pistonheads.
bigandclever said:
nickfrog said:
bigandclever said:
TomTVR500 said:
For this particular test I think a Turbo S would have been a much better bet
Apart from the "pitching-up without a box of launch computers and dual-clutch gearboxes" bit?I'd be interested to know just how sticky the tyres are on the bike, I reckon the 911 with a similar compound fitted would have performed better.
There's still no way the Porsche would win over that distance with that kind of P/W disparity between them.
A 917/30 with just under 2000bhp/tonne in 'qualy' trim might have a chance though.
There's still no way the Porsche would win over that distance with that kind of P/W disparity between them.
A 917/30 with just under 2000bhp/tonne in 'qualy' trim might have a chance though.
I would have thought this can of worms was easily obvious enough for a man of Harris' experience to give a wide berth to.
ETA: Did anyone think to play to play with tyre pressures? Particularly on the Porsche? Are they RFTs? And if they are, does the nature of RFTs negate any benefits of reduced pressures for a drag?
A few things I noted:
Nice work chaps.
ETA: Did anyone think to play to play with tyre pressures? Particularly on the Porsche? Are they RFTs? And if they are, does the nature of RFTs negate any benefits of reduced pressures for a drag?
A few things I noted:
- The Panigale wheelies like a turbo'ed Jap bike and looks like Angelina Jolie with two wheels bolted to her, I love it.
- The Porker has enough horse power to pull down old barns and only a lap-sash enertia reel belt
- I'm amazed that with the claim that the Ducati will only manage a real 175 or so at Brunters. That is a figure regularly claimed for stock bikes like my own (2004 R1 - Ive seen an indicated 186 plus some revs which Im taking to be 169-174ish) and they are around 50hp down on the Ducati. The R1 is also known for being dirty through the air. Surely the Ducati isnt a quarter again dirtier?
- Harris is a closet bike-lover and secretly wants his license but is a scardey-cat.
- That bike rider is nice level headed chap and not all like some people in biking media you hear so much about who think they are god's gift "but just never got the breaks".
- The bike possibly needed more carcass temperature in the rear, not really achievable with a short pre-run burnout, which will just heat the surface for the short term and potentially not allow as much deformation for a good launch.
Nice work chaps.
Edited by Reardy Mister on Wednesday 25th July 23:46
Gilhooligan said:
Indeed I believe yours may be an exception to the norm . I was referring mainly to modern cars with too many catalytic converters and silencers. Damn euro 5 emission regs...
I'm still running cats in my car and a full interior, in fact it's far heavier than stock. Last time out it pulled a 10.2. Amazing what decent rubber and a bit more boost can do. Put the Porsche on drag radials and see what happens (well until something breaks).Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff