RE: SOTW Lexus IS200

Author
Discussion

dibblecorse

6,875 posts

192 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Had one of these new in 2002, same spec 3 series was nearly £5k more money, was a no brainer, 3 years and 70k later was still like new, Toyota running costs and Lexus service levels, nothing not to loke, was a lovely refined place to be, drove nicely, looked good and was roomy enough .... would have one as a shed any day if the right one came up and I had a need ....

dibblecorse

6,875 posts

192 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Had one of these new in 2002, same spec 3 series was nearly £5k more money, was a no brainer, 3 years and 70k later was still like new, Toyota running costs and Lexus service levels, nothing not to loke, was a lovely refined place to be, drove nicely, looked good and was roomy enough .... would have one as a shed any day if the right one came up and I had a need ....

toon10

6,166 posts

157 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
I went to to look at one of these a few years ago as a replacement for my 2.5 Modeo. The 200 wasn't powerful enough for me and the 300 only came in auto guise. I think I'd have bought a 300 if it had amanual box. Ended up with a 2.4 Exec Accord instead.

TinyCappo

2,106 posts

153 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Im puzzled at the negative remark in relation to the altezza 2l, 200hp, 3SGE Beams engine on ITBs with dual VVTI as standard one of the best cars i have ever had the pleasure of beeing driven around in.

TNH

559 posts

147 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Good shed!

Didnt realise these were a 6 cylinder engine.

surveyor

17,811 posts

184 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
TNH said:
Good shed!

Didnt realise these were a 6 cylinder engine.
You would do if you bought one. They drink fuel.

We had one. It was very reliable, but I am not a fan.

Bit noisy, and an engine that you have to rev to get any go.

garypotter

1,499 posts

150 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
A japanese Maarsedes for under a bag of sand!

bootiful

Skellen

1,099 posts

258 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
FlashBastd said:
I ran an IS300 for about 8 months, it was without doubt my worst ever motoring decision. Bought at 3yrs old, 29k for £12k, sold 8 months later (took that long to find a buyer) for £8.5k. I hated it that much.

211 BHP - check
RWD - check
LSD - check
Dull as dishwater - check
Incredibly naff hard plastic interior - check
ESP that you can't turn off, and that beeps at you when activated - check
Incredibly thirsty even when driven gently - check

Quick, yes, but no character whatsoever. Also incredibly juicy. A cheaper more reliable 3 series it is not.
I don't agree - I ran two of these from new (a 200 and then a 300) one for several years and loved them both. The 300 was reasonbaly quick, comfy and well built. Dynamically it wasn't as good as a 330i, but it had a few nice things like a proper LSD.

One area Lexus dominate is the dealer service - top drawrer doesn't even come close, which is why I will be looking at them again when when the BMW goes back - the dealers are total crap.

thewheelman

2,194 posts

173 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
On the downside.............Alan Partridge...........

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YllyBr_4Kxk

Edited by thewheelman on Friday 27th July 11:12

Gridl0k

1,058 posts

183 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
They're only 150hp? Really?

Good perceived-price to actual-price ratio though, I wouldn't have pegged these in shed land.

ESP that beeps when off = no ta. I find cars are more predictable with it off. I kerbed the missus' 3 series when it decided to give me understeer instead of oversteer on the apex of a roundybout boxedin

Matt_N

8,900 posts

202 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Being a Sport it should also have an LSD.

I looked at a few before I bought my ATR, like the front end styling, not keen on the rear lights or the interior really though.

I did a bit of research and coil packs were a reasonably common fault, new ones were very expensive from what I can remember too.

They drive nicely though, nice mechanical gear change, engine sounds good, but does need to be worked to get the 150bhp working though.

pSyCoSiS

Original Poster:

3,594 posts

205 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
thewheelman said:
An SLK for £1500! That would have been a bag of ste, even rough ones still go for over £3k. As for the prices of the other cars you mention, they've all been around those prices for quite sometime.
It was actually a decent example mate, 97 'P' Reg, Silver, Read Leather, 230 Kompressor model.

It did have 160k on the clock, but lady owner and FSH. She had been given a company car, with no room on the drive, so was desperate to sell. Was up at £2k originally, but she came down to £1500....

My point is that you can get so much car for so little cash these days, and some people are not aware of that fact....

bumrar

178 posts

199 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
I had a sport for three years and really enjoyed driving it. Could of done with a bit more power tho, and it was thirsty and ate tyres.

Three happy years of motoring - including a trip to Lemans four up crammed with luggage. And it needed nothing other than tyres and servicing!

Then I got sick of the Alan Partridge and old man jokes, so replaced it with a Civic Type R. Now I miss the smooth ride, reliability and comfort. Does this mean I am actually old?!

Edited by bumrar on Friday 27th July 12:06

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

178 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Had a one as a company car in '99. Great motor then but 24'ish mpg was the order of the day iirc. Yeah, alround a very good car and with plenty of room for a twin turbo set up to retro fitted) but time has been a bit harsh on the IS.

gforceg

3,524 posts

179 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
bumrar said:
Could of done with a bit more power tho, and it was thirsty and ate tyres.
Any connection?

wink

thewheelman

2,194 posts

173 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
pSyCoSiS said:
thewheelman said:
An SLK for £1500! That would have been a bag of ste, even rough ones still go for over £3k. As for the prices of the other cars you mention, they've all been around those prices for quite sometime.
It was actually a decent example mate, 97 'P' Reg, Silver, Read Leather, 230 Kompressor model.

It did have 160k on the clock, but lady owner and FSH. She had been given a company car, with no room on the drive, so was desperate to sell. Was up at £2k originally, but she came down to £1500....

My point is that you can get so much car for so little cash these days, and some people are not aware of that fact....
Sounds like a bargain, I like that not everyone is aware of the bargains out there wink

pSyCoSiS

Original Poster:

3,594 posts

205 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Didn't Lexus revolutionise the chav tuning scene with these rear lights?

Even BMW did something stupid by fitting those style lights to the rear of the E46 compacts?!

This is the only car that suits these lights IMHO.

e36er

293 posts

181 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
Gridl0k said:
ESP that beeps when off = no ta.
It does show a light on the dash with the TC off, but certainly no beep.

pSyCoSiS

Original Poster:

3,594 posts

205 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
thewheelman said:
Sounds like a bargain, I like that not everyone is aware of the bargains out there wink
Totally agree - let's keep hush now!

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

178 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
pSyCoSiS said:
This is the only car that suits these lights IMHO.
Spot on.