Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1 2
4
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

26,483 posts

59 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
rb5er said:
deltashad said:
So then, did we ever find out the definition of a hot hatch?
Absolutely anything with a hatch apparently. Cars that have never before been classed as hot hatches will be given the moniker here in this one off "special" poll.
Yet even when someone produced an Autocar mag cover with it claiming it was a hot hatch you are still as stubborn as pig st and live in total refusal of the facts. True amazing biglaugh

rallycross

4,660 posts

106 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
300bhp/ton said:
Yet even when someone produced an Autocar mag cover with it claiming it was a hot hatch you are still as stubborn as pig st and live in total refusal of the facts. True amazing biglaugh
Just show us the results! The fact that every sane person knows that neither an Integrale or an Escort Cosworth is classed as a hot hatch is not going to stop you from being as stubborn as 300 tons of pig iron - so let's have the results anyway.

My vote still goes for the Clio Wiliams (having owned or driven most hot hatches made from 81 to 2000 the Williams was really very special). Otherwise it would be the Integra but it was never a hot hatch it was a coupe with a hatch.


300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

26,483 posts

59 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
rallycross said:
The fact that every sane person knows that neither an Integrale or an Escort Cosworth is classed as a hot hatch
Must be a mag of insane people then wink



biggrinbiggrinbiggrin


And as I said before (when you didn't reply)

Delta 1.6 GT -> Delta 1.6 GTI -> Delta HF Turbo -> Delta HF Turbo AWD -> Delta Integrale

The Integrale is no more a different car from a HF Turbo AWD than the HF Turbo is from the 1.6 GT. In fact probably even less so.

And they sold 44,000 Integrales. That's a heck of a lot of rally cars if they weren't road cars. Did they do a one make rally series with them?

smile

I do accept the Evo III and S4 were pretty much only homologation vehicles. But the rest were all road cars and no more different from a regular Delta than a Clio 182 Cup is from a 1.2 Clio.

rallycross

4,660 posts

106 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
Let's see the results so far!

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

47 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
rallycross said:
every sane person knows that neither an Integrale or an Escort Cosworth is classed as a hot hatch
^^^Spot on, it goes without saying. Well, to most of us anyway.

As for Autocar classing it as a hot hatch, well put it this way it suited their purpose at the time - just another magazine publisher trying to sell copy, nothing more.
Advertisement

roystinho

869 posts

44 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
Any chance of the results instead of the echo of bickering?

300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

26,483 posts

59 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
Johnboy Mac said:
^^^Spot on, it goes without saying. Well, to most of us anyway.

As for Autocar classing it as a hot hatch, well put it this way it suited their purpose at the time - just another magazine publisher trying to sell copy, nothing more.
So how is it not a hot hatch?

I mean if we drew up a check sheet for, for and against, something like this maybe:

For Against
Part of and evolution of the Delta hatch lineup
HF Turbo and HT Turbo AWD are not hugely dissimilar
The Delta is a hatchback
The Integrale being based on Delta is also a hatchback
It was a proper production model and part of the model line up
They sold 44,000 Integrales, the VAST majority were not homologation specials
5 points 0 points


SWoll

4,426 posts

127 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
The first time I've ever seen a poster hold a poll result hostage until everyone else on the thtread agrees with him.

Interesting tactic, and sure to win you many new friends I would have thought 3. hehe


BarbaricAvatar

436 posts

17 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
300bhp/ton said:
I mean if we drew up a check sheet for, for and against, something like this maybe:

For Against
Part of and evolution of the Delta hatch lineup It's 4WD
HF Turbo and HT Turbo AWD are not hugely dissimilar Usually group-tested with Escort Cosworth's, Quattro's, Impreza's and Lancer/Evo's
The Delta is a hatchback
The Integrale being based on Delta is also a hatchback
It was a proper production model and part of the model line up
They sold 44,000 Integrales, the VAST majority were not homologation specials
5 points 2 points
Ummm help? biggrin

300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

26,483 posts

59 months

[news] 
Saturday 18th August 2012 quote quote all
BarbaricAvatar said:
300bhp/ton said:
I mean if we drew up a check sheet for, for and against, something like this maybe:

For Against
Part of and evolution of the Delta hatch lineup It's 4WD so is an S3 or golf 4Motion or even a Justy
HF Turbo and HT Turbo AWD are not hugely dissimilar Usually group-tested with Escort Cosworth's, Quattro's, Impreza's and Lancer/Evo's Which while interesting has no bearing on it being a hatch or not
The Delta is a hatchback
The Integrale being based on Delta is also a hatchback
It was a proper production model and part of the model line up
They sold 44,000 Integrales, the VAST majority were not homologation specials
5 points 2 0 points
Ummm help? biggrin
EFA biggrin

Jayfish

2,202 posts

72 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
Hot hatches should be FWD everything else with a hatch shoe-horned in here is just tttery.

except the R32

/can 'o worms

Papa Hotel

9,460 posts

51 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
Forgive me, but he's right. Of course an Integrale is a hot hatch. But an R32 isn't. Nor a 147 GTA.

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

47 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
300bhp/ton said:
So how is it not a hot hatch?
If I tell you I'd only have kill you!

Raize

1,047 posts

48 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
300bhp/ton said:
BarbaricAvatar said:
300bhp/ton said:
I mean if we drew up a check sheet for, for and against, something like this maybe:

For Against
Part of and evolution of the Delta hatch lineup NO IT IS NOT A HATCHBACK BECAUSE I SAY SO!!!!
HF Turbo and HT Turbo AWD are not hugely dissimilar NO SHUT UP YOU IDIOTS!!!
The Delta is a hatchback NO
The Integrale being based on Delta is also a hatchback NO
It was a proper production model and part of the model line up NO
They sold 44,000 Integrales, the VAST majority were not homologation specials NO YOU'RE ALL WRONG
-2452423478 points 42452743723 points
Ummm help? biggrin
EFA biggrin
EFA

deltashad

2,740 posts

66 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
Johnboy Mac said:
rallycross said:
every sane person knows that neither an Integrale or an Escort Cosworth is classed as a hot hatch
^^^Spot on, it goes without saying. Well, to most of us anyway.

As for Autocar classing it as a hot hatch, well put it this way it suited their purpose at the time - just another magazine publisher trying to sell copy, nothing more.
I must be mad then. Why is it not a hot hatch? It started as a Delta 1500 LX, then they made it hot with the 1600GT, then a turbo, then fuel injection, then 4wd. The differences between the models and evolution is quite small. I had an early modified 8v and my friends modified 1600 turbo was quicker.

So please tell us your definition of a hot hatch. What are your rules. FWD? no turbo? no big wheels or wide arches? same brakes and suspension as the non hot versions?

There are huge differences between a Grp A integrale and a road 'grale. The differences between a 1600 Hf turbo ie and a grale are very few. As with any true rally car / road car.

A road integrale is not a rally car. You are obviously getting confused with the Group B cars. They were not too far removed from rally cars and were made specifically for qualification into the type series.

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

47 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
deltashad said:
I must be mad then. Why is it not a hot hatch? It started as a Delta 1500 LX, then they made it hot with the 1600GT, then a turbo, then fuel injection, then 4wd. The differences between the models and evolution is quite small. I had an early modified 8v and my friends modified 1600 turbo was quicker.

So please tell us your definition of a hot hatch. What are your rules. FWD? no turbo? no big wheels or wide arches? same brakes and suspension as the non hot versions?

There are huge differences between a Grp A integrale and a road 'grale. The differences between a 1600 Hf turbo ie and a grale are very few. As with any true rally car / road car.

A road integrale is not a rally car. You are obviously getting confused with the Group B cars. They were not too far removed from rally cars and were made specifically for qualification into the type series.
What a disservice to both Lancia and owners calling it a hot hatch, so what you are basically saying is the 8V Integale from '87 with 185bhp t/charged engine & 4x4 was in essence a Pug 205 Gti or a VW Golf Gti (both considered in that era as the definitive hot hatches - far lower power, n/a, fwd & importantly cheaper than the Integale)? Not to mention the 16V, EvoI & EvoII versions, the limited production numbers & Lancia's focus on rallying with the car. It also brings into question why those Gti owners myself included aspired to own an Integale when we already had a Pug, Golf etc? Glad, now I stuck with the Golf as clearly by your comments the expensive Lancia was a Golf!
Then again of course I could be totally wrong, after all I bought one car thinking it was basically DTM spec, yes as you said, ''obviously getting confused''! rolleyes



Edited by Johnboy Mac on Sunday 19th August 16:51

SSBB

506 posts

25 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
This thread still going? We are having polls about whether or not to have any further polls?!

What are the results?

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

47 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
SSBB said:
This thread still going? We are having polls about whether or not to have any further polls?!

What are the results?
laugh

rb5er

4,559 posts

41 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
Johnboy Mac said:
300bhp/ton said:
So how is it not a hot hatch?
If I tell you I'd only have kill you!
In that case please tell him wink

deltashad

2,740 posts

66 months

[news] 
Sunday 19th August 2012 quote quote all
Johnboy Mac said:
What a disservice to both Lancia and owners calling it a hot hatch, so what you are basically saying is the 8V Integale from '87 with 185bhp t/charged engine & 4x4 was in essence a Pug 205 Gti or a VW Golf Gti (both considered in that era as the definitive hot hatches - far lower power, n/a, fwd & importantly cheaper than the Integale)? Not to mention the 16V, EvoI & EvoII versions, the limited production numbers & Lancia's focus on rallying with the car. It also brings into question why those Gti owners myself included aspired to own an Integale when we already had a Pug, Golf etc? Glad, now I stuck with the Golf as clearly by your comments the expensive Lancia was a Golf!
Then again of course I could be totally wrong, after all I bought one car thinking it was basically DTM spec, yes as you said, ''obviously getting confused''! rolleyes
What should Lancia call it?
What I'm saying is the Lancia Delta built from 1979 to 1994 was a Hatch back. All Hf models are hot hatch variants of the luxury hatch. From the first carburetted Hf turbo of 1984 to its final evolution in 1993 (last lot sold in 94). Here is a chart to help you see the progress over the years, there was a huge jump in power and grip with the Hf 4WD, this was still a production car and still a hatch back:


Before Group B was banned (delta S4), and group S binned, Lancia already had the Delta with 4wd production ready. Regardless of whether group B remained the Delta was going to be offered with 4wd. This was its next evolution. This was the next step from the Hf Turbo i.e.

The first hot hatch was the Renault 5 Gordini.

The Golf GTi was considered the definitive hot hatch between 1976 and 1983 in many peoples eyes. Personally I always preferred the Gordini/ Gordini turbo. Much more power and fun.
The Golf's evolution stopped with the 1800. Mk2 was a bit watered down and took many years for the 16v to be launched and it always lagged behind its competitors, too little too late.

The 205 was also a great car, this took the crown from the Golf, again, not because it was the quickest, but because of how it drove.
The 205 was a different size class to the Golf. The 205 was in the Fiesta/Polo class. Its most direct competitor was the Fiesta Xr2 range. The 1.6 was a direct target for the Xr2i and the 1.9 for the RS Turbo.

The Golf was in the same size class as the Lancia Delta and the Ford Escort.
The Golf was a good car but was it the definitive hot hatch? Not in my eyes, and it didn't even start the hot hatch thing as everyone seems to gloss up.
As for the 205, yes, love it, great car, and much better than the Xr2.

If we're keeping things in the 80's, the Golf stopped evolving with the G60, the 205 with the 1.9 Roland Gaross or whatever.
They are all hot hatches just like Lancia's integrale 16v which saw out the end of the decade.

The Lancia was £16k I remember that cause it wasn't far off the price of my dads Granada ghia. (I tried to persuade him to buy one but he was in the Lancias rust engines fall out camp).
There's always going to be one car more expensive than another. Especially when the development within them is so far removed. the VW and Pug were stone age in comparison to what Lancia were throwing out of the factory.
I can't be bothered raking out my old magazines from my garage loft but there will be big differences in price between the GT turbo, Gordini, Xr2i, 205 ,Golf, 106 rallye etc etc.

Golfs were also produced in limited numbers, the Pirelli special edition and the campaign.
My dad had a Granada special edition, that didn't make it a super car. The Lancia specials are nothing more than different colour leather seats and different paint work. The engines and drivetrain/chassis remained the same.

Lancia has always rallied. They have always been involved in rallying. The only reason a Delta was put on the track was because group B was banned and they had to use a car which had sold 5000 units to the public. Hyper cars were out. If they had a coupe kicking around with a 4wd chassis they would have put that on the track. They didn't they had a HATCH BACK. Lancia were always very innovative and ahead of their competitors in many aspects of motoring.

They were not the only company delving in all wheel drive hot hatches, Mazda were at it too with the 323.

So if AWD is an unfair advantage where does it stop? I couldn't afford a 205 GTi or a Golf Gti in the 80's, I had a Renault 5 Mk1 and a Lancia Delta 1300LX, I aspired to own a Gordini turbo or a Delta Hf integrale.
I wasn't interested in the Golf GTi or the the Pug.








1 2
4
Reply to Topic