RE: 1.0-litre Formula Ford laps Norschleife in 7:22

RE: 1.0-litre Formula Ford laps Norschleife in 7:22

Author
Discussion

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Looking at the actual FF car Ford built for this demo makes me wonder how it would perform in race trim compared to the existing FF series. As an entry level open wheel series vehicle it could be a winner especially for juniors.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
J-P said:
Yes I saw that - but isn't that for a customer buying into Formula Ford championship? The chassis builders are not going to be making 1,000 per year of these and presumably couldn't benefit from the economies of scale that Ford could? So yes, if I was buying a new race car with margin for all parties, then £46k+VAT is right but if I'm buying a road car which is built by Ford, in reasonable volume, then I'd expect it to cost a lot less - or is that way off the mark?
The EcoBoost chassis has some carbon fibre control parts which manufacturers have to include (front and rear crash boxes are mentioned), which is claimed to reduce overall costs. The rest is tubular steel, so how much cost saving would there be? I guess* that a production run of a few thousand vehicles wouldn't justify an investment in tooling. As another pure guess, I imagine it would be similar to Caterham processes and volumes.

If Ford could suddenly mass-produce these chassis for, e.g. £7K-8K it would put all the race chassis manufacturers out of business.

I don't know about the cost of the gearbox, but if it's a sequential transaxle you're looking at, what? £6000? (I would guess the racers use Hewland or someone similar).

 *Based on nothing but gut feel and the desire to back up my point

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Russ Bost said:
Apparently from the no. of hits I'm picking up on my website there is a link to me on here somewhere smile Tho' I've not found it yet??? I've been building these
There is smile

I had a quick scan, and the only problem I find is seemingly to build any kit car like this takes a lot of mechanical knowledge and part sourcing.

Its very intimidating, if a package could be bought with all parts included and step by step instructions I'd be a lot more inclined.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

237 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
chuntington101 said:
Intresting. makes you wonder how fast the 1.6 turbo veriosn of the Formula Ford cars would be! smile
It's 40BHP down on this example.
Thats intresting! i guess what would give the 1.6trubo engines about 160bhp, similar to the 1.6NA motors. But the turbo motors just pull away form them thanks to the extra torque (from the races i have seen).

Dont suppose you have any idea how much a 1.6turbo FF costs new do you? Be intrtesting to see how much they cost new.

Regards,

Chris.

scarble

5,277 posts

158 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
r-r-r-road l-legal?

I've been arguing for a while that downsizing was a far better option (for now at least) than hybrids or full EVs, glad someone is finally getting it right and doing the halo car thing to prove it. Would really like to know what they've done to get that power output.. I would love to spend some time going over one of these engines.

Russ Bost

456 posts

210 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
"I had a quick scan, and the only problem I find is seemingly to build any kit car like this takes a lot of mechanical knowledge and part sourcing"

In the case of the Furore F1 all parts come from one source, the MR2 MK1 (& there are still sufficient around to source the sort of volume I sell - if demand increased we'd simply switch to more bespoke parts, which increased volume would justify) with the exception of the steering rack which is Cinquecento/Seicento & readily available. I can provide all parts to build if required, all a question of budget.

Projects like this are not hard if approached correctly, what really costs the time & therefore money are all the little fiddly bits of finishing off, improving panel fit etc. Requires virtually no mechanical knowledge for that sort of thing, just time & patience. The other place people often seek assistance is with wiring, but we can supply a loom & instructions that anyone with a little electrical knowledge & a reasonable amount of common sense should be able to follow.

Anyone that kids themselves that putting a Formula Ford or any other race car on the road is easy is a fool (believe me, I've done it) by the time you've changed the suspension to get a sensible ride height, changed steering wheel/column/brakes & seat belt mountings to comply with IVA regs & then added stuff like handbrake/lights/indicators/& control equipment for same it's far easier & cheaper to start with something that was designed as a road car (albeit looking at a glance like a race car) in the first place.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:
xRIEx said:
chuntington101 said:
Intresting. makes you wonder how fast the 1.6 turbo veriosn of the Formula Ford cars would be! smile
It's 40BHP down on this example.
Thats intresting! i guess what would give the 1.6trubo engines about 160bhp, similar to the 1.6NA motors. But the turbo motors just pull away form them thanks to the extra torque (from the races i have seen).

Dont suppose you have any idea how much a 1.6turbo FF costs new do you? Be intrtesting to see how much they cost new.

Regards,

Chris.
£50,200 inc VAT according to http://www.britishformulaford.co.uk/costs.htm

J-P

4,351 posts

207 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
J-P said:
Yes I saw that - but isn't that for a customer buying into Formula Ford championship? The chassis builders are not going to be making 1,000 per year of these and presumably couldn't benefit from the economies of scale that Ford could? So yes, if I was buying a new race car with margin for all parties, then £46k+VAT is right but if I'm buying a road car which is built by Ford, in reasonable volume, then I'd expect it to cost a lot less - or is that way off the mark?
The EcoBoost chassis has some carbon fibre control parts which manufacturers have to include (front and rear crash boxes are mentioned), which is claimed to reduce overall costs. The rest is tubular steel, so how much cost saving would there be? I guess* that a production run of a few thousand vehicles wouldn't justify an investment in tooling. As another pure guess, I imagine it would be similar to Caterham processes and volumes.

If Ford could suddenly mass-produce these chassis for, e.g. £7K-8K it would put all the race chassis manufacturers out of business.

I don't know about the cost of the gearbox, but if it's a sequential transaxle you're looking at, what? £6000? (I would guess the racers use Hewland or someone similar).

 *Based on nothing but gut feel and the desire to back up my point
Yes I see what you mean - but using the Caterham example, they sell the Supersport for just over £20k, probably £23k fully built. I don't see why Ford couldn't do that too. Admittedly, tooling costs to set-up would be quite high but there must be 1,000 + buyers a year at £20k, globally, surely - Caterham manage that and more without the massive infrastructure that Ford would have to support the car!

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
hwajones said:
Brilliant, surely this is the future of economy motoring at least in the short term before hydrogen etc are developed to break the laws of physics .
EFA

Captain Muppet

8,540 posts

266 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
hwajones said:
Brilliant, surely this is the future of economy motoring at least in the short term before sythetic methanol lets us carry on just as we do now but with even more windfarms.
EFA
EFmoreA

mrhaitchbee

13 posts

150 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Ok, I seriously love the 1.0 ecoboost engine and want one (the 120hp one please) to put in an old ford KA I think it would be a hoot and better than the 1.8 zetec lump I was planning on putting in. (please ford, if you read this take pity, I can pay in fruit pastilles!)

However, power to capacity wise, I'm sure the Diahatsu Chirade Gtti was pretty impressive from a 1L turbo lump? 100 hp or something? (Please step in if you know the full figure) also, the old B16 honda lumps chucking out 150 from a 1.6 etc. Ford have done well but pre cat. we had some good stuff too!

J-P

4,351 posts

207 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Russ Bost said:
Apparently from the no. of hits I'm picking up on my website there is a link to me on here somewhere smile Tho' I've not found it yet???
Halfway down page 6, you'll see the linky - Cars look lovely. I'd be extremely impressed if you were doing more than 1,000 of these though and I reckon a decent and independently verified 'ring time would help your cause!

ukmike2000

476 posts

169 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Can we PLEEEEASE have a production version!

cptsideways

13,553 posts

253 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
Thats fast!!! very fast, its an amazing engine in a road car must be bonkers in something that weighs a few hundred kilos.


Want one!!!!

chuntington101

5,733 posts

237 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
£50,200 inc VAT according to http://www.britishformulaford.co.uk/costs.htm
Thanks for the info. Bit exspneive at the moment buut hopefully chassis costs would come down over the next few years? Anyone know how tuneable the 1.6 engines are?

The Wookie

13,970 posts

229 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
An eagle eyed coworker has just spotted that the tyres being used aren't actually road legal... scratchchin

Tarmac rally tyres apparently!

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
The Wookie said:
An eagle eyed coworker has just spotted that the tyres being used aren't actually road legal... scratchchin

Tarmac rally tyres apparently!
Pretty sure they're still legal, no?

Stuff like Colway Formula 2 and Maxsport RB5 are road legal, aren't they?
Could be totally wrong here, but I thought rally cars had to be road legal paperbag

The Wookie

13,970 posts

229 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
Could be totally wrong here, but I thought rally cars had to be road legal paperbag
We thought the same initially, but they're listed on Demon Tweeks (admittedly not conclusive) as for Competition Use only.

Another coworker has suggested that this might allow them to be road legal for competition use, but they don't appear to be 'road legal' as such...

Happy to be corrected of course!

ETA - Dunlop CR311's

Edited by The Wookie on Wednesday 5th September 16:51

Arun_D

2,302 posts

196 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
I'm sure the outcome would still be very similar if it were on road legal semi-slicks (R888s and the like).

Captain Muppet

8,540 posts

266 months

Wednesday 5th September 2012
quotequote all
The Wookie said:
StottyZr said:
Could be totally wrong here, but I thought rally cars had to be road legal paperbag
We thought the same initially, but they're listed on Demon Tweeks (admittedly not conclusive) as for Competition Use only.

Another coworker has suggested that this might allow them to be road legal for competition use, but they don't appear to be 'road legal' as such...

Happy to be corrected of course!

ETA - Dunlop CR311's

Edited by The Wookie on Wednesday 5th September 16:51
Some CR311 are e-marked apparently:

http://www.mrtyremotorsport.co.uk/dunlop-cr311-his...