RE: Aston Martin revives DB9
Discussion
What's the deal with who owns aston these days? Are they totally independant?
It would appear there's no money to reinvest in building any successors to the current line up which is a shame.
I hate to say it but it would appear they need a 4x4 platform for a premium SUV to bring some coin in, but if they have no other manufacturer they can borrow the platform from I guess they can't afford to develope one themselves?
It would appear there's no money to reinvest in building any successors to the current line up which is a shame.
I hate to say it but it would appear they need a 4x4 platform for a premium SUV to bring some coin in, but if they have no other manufacturer they can borrow the platform from I guess they can't afford to develope one themselves?
its not dated looking its just that there are plenty of them around and i think that people paying £130k for a car probably dont want theirs looking like a 40k 2005 model. in other words Im saying those buyers can be snobby and choosy ... i think they needed to change the shape a bit more...
DanDC5 said:
Why change beauty when you can subtly enhance it? Nothing wrong with how Aston's look now, they're just getting better.
Isn't this the same pattern they followed with the DB7? Take a beautiful car and then over time make it look fussier and less resolved with half assed modifications to the styling? I suppose they must decide that they have to do something to make the new ones look different to the old, even if it doesn't actually improve the look of the car. The car in it's original incarnation, as pictured above, looks so fresh even today.
your bang on here, thats exactly what happened. I bet examination of the chassis numbers would show this to be true!
munch997 said:
So basicly they have lots of Virage to shift as they didn't sell many due to being too similar to the DB9, so they rebadged them, but to make people belive its a new car, fitted a DSB bootlid.
Bravo.
Bravo.
That's much more like it! OK it's only taking exactly what Aston had before (Virage looks, DBS engine) and tweaking it a bit, but now it's one good car, rather than the bits of one good car split up between three.
Incidentally, what's become of the Rapide? I always thought that was an especially huge missed opportunity (I'd rather have seen a genuinely spacious estate), but Wikipedia says production of that's stopped too?
Incidentally, what's become of the Rapide? I always thought that was an especially huge missed opportunity (I'd rather have seen a genuinely spacious estate), but Wikipedia says production of that's stopped too?
I cannot believe some of the snipes and whinging from all the Walter Mitty's on PH who obviously don't drive am AM only because of their reluctance for revolutionary model changes.
AM have taken the DB7/DB9 massively further in ~18 years than Porsche have the 911 in 50. And yet at no stage has there really been a prettier contemporary rival. That's some achievement, how about some credit?
I can buy a much more powerful, hi-tech car for much less. Subjectively, my brief time in a DB9 was a little disappointing. But I'll always want one, even just to look back at it whenever possible.
MrTappets said:
Incidentally, what's become of the Rapide? I always thought that was an especially huge missed opportunity (I'd rather have seen a genuinely spacious estate), but Wikipedia says production of that's stopped too?
Because the Rapide S will be out soon, probably with the DBS engine. Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff