RE: DVLA in 'cutting red tape' shocker

RE: DVLA in 'cutting red tape' shocker

Author
Discussion

Dave Hedgehog

14,569 posts

205 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
people too daft not to spend 5 mins doing it online deserve to queue for an hour smile

londonbabe

2,045 posts

193 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Use only fuel duty for cars and motorcycles.
Continue to impose extra fees for trucks and buses (because of the greater physical damage to the road surface that heavier vehicles cause, rather than the amount of fuel they use)

That could lower the hypothetical amount they would need to add to the fuel price.
As would stopping printing and mailing discs, repealing the legislation that surrounds them (e.g. SORN), and making all the jobs of the people who administer and enforce this system redundant.

marcosgt

11,021 posts

177 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
Alex said:
IanJ9375 said:
Why not go the whole hog and remove the need to display a disc at all?
Even less red tape and just have a db such as the askmid site to confirm a licence is in place?
Even better: scrap the licence altogether and replace with a small levy on fuel.
yes

been saying this for years!
Ha ha, dream on... SMALL levy on fuel???? No government understands the concept of a SMALL levy... It'll just be a bigger and bigger stick to beat the driver with each year.

Of course, it's also a tax that hits the poorest hardest (every litre costs more to cover the RFL lost, but the rich with 20 cars in their garage pay nothing when not driving them), so I can understand why it's popular here...

Dave Hedgehog said:
people too daft not to spend 5 mins doing it online deserve to queue for an hour smile
I was going to say not everyone has a PC, but as you can wander into your local library and use a PC for nothing, I think I'd agree... I can't recall the last time any of our cars were taxed at a PO.

M.

radio man

202 posts

175 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
This will be a blessing to me, last year when I dutyfuly attended my local post office to tax my wifes car the snotty, arrogant and very wrong old c~w behind the counter told me i couldn't tax the car because I was not the reg keeper, when i explained (politely) that she was mistaken and the govt didn't care who taxed the car so long as it was taxed she ordered me to leave the premisses. I went to the next town and insured the car at their Post office without any problems whatsoever.
So I hope this will be the end of Jobsworths like her.

98elise

26,644 posts

162 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Alex said:
98elise said:
This has caused me a real problem: I bought a car mid month which needed tax. new tax runs from the beginning of the month, but my insurance ran from the day of purchase, puting them about a week apart. When I went to renew the tax the following year, they wouldn't let me tax it because "I didn't have enough insurance left" (ie about a week from renewal)!!

I had to wait until I had my new policy in place, before I could tax the car, even though the car had perfectly valid insurance frown
They should let you tax the car even if you only have 1 hour of insurance left.
In this case they wouldn't let me. It might be something they have sorted now, as it made no sense at all. It may also have been a mistake by the person at the counter, but either was I was willing to pay the tax, but couldn't. I had to go back the next weekend with my fresh insurance, and buy the tax.


will261058

1,115 posts

193 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Alex said:
IanJ9375 said:
Why not go the whole hog and remove the need to display a disc at all?
Even less red tape and just have a db such as the askmid site to confirm a licence is in place?
Even better: scrap the licence altogether and replace with a small levy on fuel.
I have often thought that this would be a good idea but the fly in the ointment for me is that "small" levy becomes "big" levy before long!

Terry Barr

106 posts

199 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Zumbruk said:
Not "in some cases"; in all cases. The VAT on petrol is levied on taxes already paid.

Besides, AFAIK, the Irish already tried this, then decided they wanted an annual check on paperwork, imposed a fee to pay for it, so they ended up with a levy on fuel and an annual fee. Which then went up regularly until it was the same as the previous tax disk.


Edited by Zumbruk on Monday 15th October 12:12
According to the famous LJK Setright, fuel tax was first dreamed up by a frenchman as a fairer alternative to road tax in that the more thst you used the roads, the faster you drove or the bigger the car the more fuel you used and hence the more tax you paid. Setright's comment was something like, 'Well you can always depend on a government to steal with the right hand whilst thieving with the left hand, so we have both'

Greg_D

6,542 posts

247 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
The reason the government don't implement a system of extra fuel taxation is not one of falling revenue (everyone would seems happy to pay an amount in line with their historic tax receipts) but more about the fact that large swathes of the DVLA drones would need to be laid off.

There's no way that they could decimate a workforce that large in such a deprived part of the UK, it would be the poll tax riots/miners strike all over again

Alex

9,975 posts

285 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Greg_D said:
The reason the government don't implement a system of extra fuel taxation is not one of falling revenue (everyone would seems happy to pay an amount in line with their historic tax receipts) but more about the fact that large swathes of the DVLA drones would need to be laid off.

There's no way that they could decimate a workforce that large in such a deprived part of the UK, it would be the poll tax riots/miners strike all over again
Although probably true, that's a ridiculous argument when you think about it. The Government might as well pay gangs of young people to smash windows.

timewatch

881 posts

195 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Alex said:
Even better: scrap the licence altogether and replace with a small levy on fuel.
NO NO NO!!!!

No more on fuel!furious

My car is 4 grams over the limit into Band L £460, ONLY "4 grams" less and it would have been £190.

It's st like this that needs to stop....Putting it on the fuel is no help!


TW>>>

Greg_D

6,542 posts

247 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
timewatch said:
Alex said:
Even better: scrap the licence altogether and replace with a small levy on fuel.
NO NO NO!!!!

No more on fuel!furious

My car is 4 grams over the limit into Band L £460, ONLY "4 grams" less and it would have been £190.

It's st like this that needs to stop....Putting it on the fuel is no help!


TW>>>
Eh, you are arguing against an idea that would counter that exact problem confusedconfusedconfused

Skodaku

1,805 posts

220 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
yes

been saying this for years!
Me too - and my long- deceased Father. But then, half of Swansea would be unemployed.

byebye

dingocooke

670 posts

221 months

Wednesday 24th October 2012
quotequote all
Skodaku said:
Me too - and my long- deceased Father. But then, the other half of Swansea would be unemployed.

byebye
...fixed it for you ;-)