Re: Where Jag went wrong

Re: Where Jag went wrong

Author
Discussion

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
crofty1984 said:
Per vehicle.
Who's to say if it was a tenner more expensive they wouldn't lose half their customers?
Do you think that's likely?

Captain Muppet

8,540 posts

266 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
And as for the E-type being handmade, what's this then:

Is that a picture of loads of robots? Or is it a picture of cars being hand-built on a production line?

Fittster

20,120 posts

214 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Captain Muppet said:
Twincam16 said:
And as for the E-type being handmade, what's this then:

Is that a picture of loads of robots? Or is it a picture of cars being hand-built on a production line?
Did Henry Ford have robots building the Model T back in 1908?

PHMatt

608 posts

149 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Yes yes, E-Type wonderfull blah blah,XJS evil naughty bad car....generic nonsense blah blah.

Jag havent made a great car since the e-type..... blah blah
Jag havent made a pretty car since the e-type..... blah blah


Cough cough.....XK.....cough...!



Twincam16

27,646 posts

259 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Captain Muppet said:
Twincam16 said:
And as for the E-type being handmade, what's this then:

Is that a picture of loads of robots? Or is it a picture of cars being hand-built on a production line?
Well in that case, by your definition back then all cars were handbuilt. I think what you're referring to is 'coachbuilt', which E-types were not. They were built on production lines in the most efficient mass methods available at the time.

Bear in mind that in 1961, the only robot working in the automotive industry was a robot crane-arm that General Motors had for lifting bodyshells off the back of trucks.

The use of robots on the production line only really began in the late '70s.

PhilJames

234 posts

194 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
While Peugeot and Citroën make some good looking cars now by making them look more "German", they actually turn boring. Jaguar really does stand out in the crowd, the only think you could accuse them of is that they've taken too much design cues from Aston Martin. And that's hardly an insult, is it?

Edited by ZesPak on Thursday 15th November 12:07
Jaguar don't take their design cues from Aston Martin, they were all apart of the same Ford group when Ian Callum designed for Aston and Jaguar.

Strawman

6,463 posts

208 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
Well in that case, by your definition back then all cars were handbuilt. I think what you're referring to is 'coachbuilt', which E-types were not. They were built on production lines in the most efficient mass methods available at the time.
No they weren't, the bonnet famously takes many hours of skilled labour to fit to each car individually and can't be swapped from one car to another without lots of modification. Rather than investing in lots of expensive tooling for the body panels the cars were built using lots of hand built techniques.

jpf

1,312 posts

277 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Proper manual transmission and I'd consider the F Type. Right now the Alfa 4C is captivating me though.

ZesPak

24,435 posts

197 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
jpf said:
Proper manual transmission and I'd consider the F Type. Right now the Alfa 4C is captivating me though.
Almost forgot about that! Is that still happening?

Nick644

241 posts

268 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all

jpf said:
Proper manual transmission and I'd consider the F Type. Right now the Alfa 4C is captivating me though.
My thoughts exactly. Though of course the 4c will be auto flappy paddle, no manual option. No doubt Alfa will cock it up with a clunky duff gearbox as a cost cutting measure to keep the price down.


Mark-C

5,138 posts

206 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
As stated somewhere in the first page of comments the Series 3 E-Type was the start of the bloat so it's wrong to blame it on the XJ-S. I prefer the XJ-S (even more so when it got facelifted and lost the hyphen) but that may be just because I was the right age to be excited when it was released because the E-Type seemed old fashioned by then.

And that's why I now have one smile

vinceh

154 posts

229 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Remember the days when the V12 E-Type was completely unloved? This one I filmed was utterly gorgeous http://goo.gl/bErWM and up for sale at £110,000!

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
JREwing said:
Hellbound said:
I won't be surprised if this car gets 5 stars all round by British motoring journalists.
Are you trying to imply it won't be very good but will be the subject of favour?
Not at all. But I do think if it's a genuine '4 out of 5 stars' car it will get the full 5 stars because of it's marque, heritage and vested interest by certain people.

Then a few years down the road you'll hear people being more critical of it.

Unless it turns out to be a complete lemon of course!

Anyway I'm just opining about nothing in particular, I'm sure it will be a fab steer.

renrut

1,478 posts

206 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Hmm,

Maybe the front a bit, but imho they carry the same nose but with totally different proportions:
Thats what I mean. IMO the proportions suit the XF perfectly and I reckon its the most handsome car in its sector by a long mile. But I feel the XJ being a bigger car and thus needing the different proportions looks a little odd. It reminded me of a TV program I saw years ago about 2 twins but one who had suffered from excessive growth caused by a brain tumour - one looked normal the other looked like a weird caricature of the normal one but they were still clearly brothers. I'm not saying the XJ is ugly but I hope they don't try to force that corporate look onto the sports cars.


But I do still much prefer the X350 even if it looked 'dated', a much more charming car.

carinaman

21,325 posts

173 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
'Lost it'?

Errrr...it's like the debate on wheeltrims on the Corgi Cavalier SRi Mk2, in that we have had magazines and books since then that give us more information on what happened so accusations of sensationalism on the PH would seem valid.


Oddball RS

1,757 posts

219 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
Oddball RS said:
I'm concerned, the E-type was a maybe not quite a revolution when it came out but it was ground breaking, and in every way, style, cost, performance.

Now to all those that laud the new car - its considerably better than anything else on sale because............. what? go on?

I will wish it all the success in the world, but the same it is not.
It could never be.

When the E-type was released, 150mph was supercar territory. The world's fastest road cars in 1961 did, what, 160? 170?

Given that the likes of Bugatti, Koenigsegg and SSC are slugging it out to see who can comprehensively blast past 250, the equivalent today would be a mid-engined supercar that did 220mph for £45k.
Exactly so lets keep it in focus 'it will be a good auto roadster'

Muzzer79

10,044 posts

188 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
I'm concerned, the E-type was a maybe not quite a revolution when it came out but it was ground breaking, and in every way, style, cost, performance.

Now to all those that laud the new car - its considerably better than anything else on sale because............. what? go on?

I will wish it all the success in the world, but the same it is not.
Herein lies the problem Jaguar faces.

Everyone expects another E-Type. Another ground-breaking, beautiful, cheap, fast and good to drive car. A car that makes supercars look expensive.

But it's impossible to do that in this day and age.

Nick644

241 posts

268 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
The F type will have had a lot of investment by Tata, looking at what they have done to Land Rover, I suspect, unlike the past, there will be continued huge investment in both Land Rover and Jaguar, with big increases in reliability. The F type, unlike the E type will undoubtedly get better and better. In my opinion, it tends to appeal to the older buyer, (unlike the 911 which appeals across the age spectrum). Keep the convertible as an auto, make the coupe more of a drivers car with manual option and bring out a more stripped out coupe version al la Porsche GT3 and they'll be on to a real winner, especially if the coupe could have some token back seats to throw the dog in/small kids etc..

ogriboy

5 posts

177 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
I have got to say I love the XJS still got one had it 16 years brilliant ride and comfort still hard to beat. Been in a E Type reminds me of my TR4 and apart from the value aspect wouldn't swop.

cookie1600

2,126 posts

162 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Where Jag went wrong?

1968 when they merged with the British Motor Corporation, later to become British Leyland - need I say anymore?

Where Jag started to get it right?

Somewhere around 2008 when Tata took over.....

Edited by cookie1600 on Thursday 15th November 17:08