RE: GT86: banned!

Author
Discussion

LordGrover

33,549 posts

213 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Aw. frown
I was looking forward to a new thread about how perfect/too slow the GT86 is.
Disappointed.

jonasaurus

71 posts

173 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
What is this world coming to..

Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Good, it was a fking horrible advert.

carsnapper

334 posts

242 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
aholes - TWO people TWO! Complain and that's it - it's gone, never to be seen on TV again and Toyota arwe out of pocket, what? a few Mil?

Can you complain about the complainers?
Agreed - I am so fed up with the minorities 'taking offence' in this country. They are in the minority for a reason, the majority couldn't care less for their pretend offence. This sh!tty decision needs to be reversed and this country needs to have a serious chat with itself.

carsnapper

334 posts

242 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Stu R said:
Good, it was a fking horrible advert.
Sh!t stirrer! wink

Ved

3,825 posts

176 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Canada likes oversteer with the BRZ.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jmVHaEjT8A&lis...

Burnham

3,668 posts

260 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
This makes me want to punch a seagull.

don logan

3,523 posts

223 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Stu R said:
Good, it was a fking horrible advert.
I actually thought the ad was wk but the complainers are wkERS!

Charge99

129 posts

175 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Can't hear the sound at work, but I like!

Toyota probably knew it would be banned... It serves them right, they should have just shown the car doing a steady 70mph on the motorway!

It's often other companies that complain about these ads, so perhaps Subaru?!

It seems you can either advertise your new sports car by showing how safely it can overtake a tractor and have to pay for the advert, or give it to Jeremy Clarkson who can do what the hell he wants with it!

Pierscoe1

2,458 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
how utterly depressing.


apparently quie a lot of people die each year whilst trying to put on their socks.
Can but hope it's the same people who come up with "Any references to such characteristics must not imply excitement" and other such pathetic BS.




em177

3,131 posts

165 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Why doesn't every one on this page complain that Eastenders is killing our children.

Think it'll work) wink

Steve_F

860 posts

195 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Is it just me that doesn't completely buy this?

There are loads of adverts worse than this and two people complaining would hardly result in banning it.

Wonder if this has been a marketing masterstroke to say this has been pulled as it's been all over twitter/internet forums already today. Lot more penetration than the original ad I 'd guess. I fast forward all adverts when watching TV but I've watched this one today.

Might be wrong but either way they will be delighted at how much buzz it has achieved by being banned.

stuckmojo

2,984 posts

189 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
In the quiet words of Mike Muir of Suicidal Tendencies:

[quote]
Just cause you don't understand what's going on don't mean it don't make no sense
And just cause you don't like it, don't mean it ain't no good
And let me tell you something;

Before you go taking a walk in my world
You better take a look at the real world
Cause this ain't no Mister Roger's Neighborhood

Can you say "feel like st"?
Yea maybe sometimes I do feel like st
I ain't happy 'bout it, but I'd rather feel like st than be full of st!

And if I offended you, oh I'm sorry...
But maybe you need to be offended
But here's my apology and one more thing...fk you!


[/quote]

RacerMDR

5,516 posts

211 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
it isn't fair is it - why isn't there a way of saying how much you like the advert?

2 people complain
2 million give it a thumbs up

Advert stays and the 2 losers can go forth and multiply

Twincam16

27,646 posts

259 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
How many people have seen this advert? Two complain, and their opinion is considered to carry more weight than anyone elses.

Democracy in action.

What I just do not get at all is this: Where is the evidence to say that seeing cars being driven quickly, or the implication that they are derived from competition cars, makes people drive irresponsibly on the road?

Because if there is cast-iron evidence, the ASA is pissing in the wind. How on earth will people be able to contain themselves after watching Top Gear? Or the BTCC? Or reading a car magazine? Or going on here? Or playing Need For Speed Most Wanted? Or going to the cinema for the next instalment of The Fast & The Furious?

Given that all this stuff exists and is extremely popular, then surely the government (because the ASA is a government body, and therefore upholds government policy backed by government 'evidence') will have to ban motorsport, driving-based computer games, car magazines, or in fact any film or TV programme in which a car is driven in any manner other than that which you'd adopt to pass your test.

And as for the Goodwood Festival of Speed - bloody hell! Even the name is surely enough to make me want to drive down pavements mowing down children! If I were to go there and see someone driving a car quickly up a hill, something strange would happen in my brain and I'd have no choice but to drive home sideways at 150mph.

This is utter nonsense. How on earth has car advertising become so regulated?

If I were in charge of Toyota's marketing department, in the name of loss of revenue, I'd be taking the ASA to court over this, where I'd make them lay out conclusive proof that adverts with fast cars in them make people drive recklessly. Because I bet they can't provide ANY.

s m

23,245 posts

204 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
aholes - TWO people TWO! Complain and that's it - it's gone, never to be seen on TV again
Although Toyota are saying still that the normal 60 second ad shown on TV is still OK.
Only the 90 second ad was banned

andyr300

45 posts

201 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Presumably those jag adverts they use on sky sports when the cricket is on should be banned too then??

otolith

56,219 posts

205 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
PH said:
Which raises an interesting question. Just how do you advertise a performance vehicle, given the guidelines that dictate how you portray and promote cars?
My thoughts exactly - it amounts to saying that you can't advertise a performance car as such. Who makes these decisions on what is and is not allowed to be shown, and how do we get the guidelines changed?

David1976

76 posts

150 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
It's a good job that the advert is banned.

If it wasn't for that ad I would have driven more responsibly...

ZesPak

24,435 posts

197 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Ha!

Called it back in august:

ZesPak said:
Caulkhead said:
I was amazed to see a car being driven enthusiastically on a TV advert - bit of oversteer even! Thought you weren't allowed.
Hence the "video game" style.

You can if you show a video game advert.

However, this is a real car advert in video game style. I'm guessing the EU are already setting up a meeting to address this "loophole" irked