RE: Jaguar C-X75 cancelled

RE: Jaguar C-X75 cancelled

Author
Discussion

crofty1984

15,873 posts

205 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
snaelro said:
it is not a surprise. from the beginning it was making no sense. especially when in parallel they announce to go down market with a 3 series
jaguar was simply too arrogant and selfconfident when they announced the production of this car.

they don't have the image of ferrari or porsche and they have never produced a true sportscar, only some sort of muscle car with big v8 and auto box only able to drift and smoke their tyres.
Apart from the C,D, and E-Type.
And the XJ220.

VeeDub Geezer

461 posts

155 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
snaelro said:
they have never produced a true sportscar, only some sort of muscle car with big v8 and auto box only able to drift and smoke their tyres.
Really??

myhandle

1,194 posts

175 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
I suspect that Jaguar has had a look into the crystal ball to a time 3 years from now when Evo manages to get together :

918 Spyder
Enzo 2
Veyron 2
McLaren P1

and they have realised that lovely though it is, the CX-75 would be likely to finish 5th in this comparison as enough is now known about the others for Jaguar to know the competition will be very, very strong.

pti

1,704 posts

145 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
wemorgan said:
craigjm said:
Really? where did you get that information from? one of my friends is a senior engineer at JLR and that is the opposite of what he told me.
Hardly any JLR employees worked on the car vs other consultants

Edited by wemorgan on Tuesday 11th December 12:33
Very true. Some prototypes have been doing laps of the test track for a number of weeks now though.

RTH

1,057 posts

213 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
That is a beautiful shape for a new Jaguar....Don't waste it, create a conventional sensible car around it with William Lyons original philosophy of cars that looked as if they were very expensive but were surprisingly within the reach of the many.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
crofty1984 said:
snaelro said:
it is not a surprise. from the beginning it was making no sense. especially when in parallel they announce to go down market with a 3 series
jaguar was simply too arrogant and selfconfident when they announced the production of this car.

they don't have the image of ferrari or porsche and they have never produced a true sportscar, only some sort of muscle car with big v8 and auto box only able to drift and smoke their tyres.
Apart from the C,D, and E-Type.
And the XJ220.
Give him a break, he's ony 12.

C

Chim

7,259 posts

178 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
snaelro said:
they have never produced a true sportscar,
rofl

Apart from one of the most iconic sports cars ever built




rofl and a few others to boot, some posters really do come out with serious pish

killingjoker

950 posts

194 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
RTH said:
That is a beautiful shape for a new Jaguar....Don't waste it, create a conventional sensible car around it with William Lyons original philosophy of cars that looked as if they were very expensive but were surprisingly within the reach of the many.
Exactly.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
I've still no idea how this car ever got the green light in the first place. The claimed performance and economy was unfeasible, the technology unproven and flawed. Jag don't need a "halo" model supercar, they need a class leading 3 series competitor or similar.

Sure, build a motorshow concept for a couple of million £, write it off against that years marketing budget, get some column inches, but then quietly drop it sharpish!

jl34

524 posts

238 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
One of the most beautiful shapes i have ever seen. My jaw dropped when i saw it at Goodwood. Pity they couldnt re engineer it to use the new 3 litre v6 supercharged

Greeny

1,421 posts

260 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Really? where did you get that information from? one of my friends is a senior engineer at JLR and that is the opposite of what he told me.
I got my information direct from the factory at Williams. As an update however, the latter stages of development have apparently to quote "been a nightmare"
It was however definatley due for production, albeit scaled back to a run of 75.

Otispunkmeyer

12,606 posts

156 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
JW911 said:
Two problems with the turbine CX-75 prototypes as I understand it. You couldn't run the turbines for very long without melting the back end - which would probably have bankrupted the warranty department.

Also, even a multi gazillionniare may wince a bit with a major service on twin turbines. Turbine blades crack microscopically during use (even titanium ones) and would need to be replaced prior to any likelihood of failure. An uncontained blade separation at 20000 rpm is bad enough on an aircraft but doesn't bear thinking about on a road car.

"We need to replace six titanium blades in the hot section due to cracking, sir," each service will go down well I'm sure. Great concept though and hopefully it'll work properly in future.
Plus I would love to know how they planned on sound proofing the thing. We have a micro-turbine here in the lab and no joke you can hear it on the other side of the building when its on. Ear defenders are needed if you want to be in the same room as it.

morgs_

1,663 posts

188 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
crofty1984 said:
snaelro said:
it is not a surprise. from the beginning it was making no sense. especially when in parallel they announce to go down market with a 3 series
jaguar was simply too arrogant and selfconfident when they announced the production of this car.

they don't have the image of ferrari or porsche and they have never produced a true sportscar, only some sort of muscle car with big v8 and auto box only able to drift and smoke their tyres.
Apart from the C,D, and E-Type.
And the XJ220.
Give him a break, he's ony 12.

C
I have a parrot for Mr Snaelro! hehe

Craig, age is no excuse. I've had a model (exactly the same as in Chim's picture biggrin) since I was in single digits. I then stood and watched the real thing, drive into the car park of the site we were camping at for my first Le Mans Classic. I stood and drooled cloud9

I'm gutted that they have binned the C-X75, as others have said, the design is just gorgeous. One of the best for a while. It was one of those "stop and stare" moments for me.

DJRC

23,563 posts

237 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
So can we get the shape with the Supercharged V8 in but ramped upto say 600BHP? Twin screws...700?


RX7

258 posts

245 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
"try and combine existing technology with electric tech to answer the cry for new-age hybrid supercars "

There is a cry for hybrid supercars, would be very interested to know from who!

Amizade

284 posts

226 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
So can we get the shape with the Supercharged V8 in but ramped upto say 600BHP? Twin screws...700?
or for real power stick the powerplant from a 535d innit

andrewrob

2,913 posts

191 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
crofty1984 said:
snaelro said:
it is not a surprise. from the beginning it was making no sense. especially when in parallel they announce to go down market with a 3 series
jaguar was simply too arrogant and selfconfident when they announced the production of this car.

they don't have the image of ferrari or porsche and they have never produced a true sportscar, only some sort of muscle car with big v8 and auto box only able to drift and smoke their tyres.
Apart from the C,D, and E-Type.
And the XJ220.
Give him a break, he's ony 12.

C
My son is 6 and even he knows thata D type, E type and XJ220 is.

Rammy76

1,050 posts

184 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
There must still be ongoing trials and testing with the technology, they certainly have an interest since Mr Tata owns a slice of the company involved in the development of the micro turbines...

http://www.bladonjets.com/about/history/

snaelro

88 posts

156 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
crofty1984 said:
Apart from the C,D, and E-Type.
And the XJ220.
that was more than 20 years ago...
brakes, engine, gear boxes, chassis, electronic, ett have evolved quite a bit since then...the CX75 had carbon chassis, dual clutch gearbox, hybrid system, active aero, high capacity engine, things that jaguar has never done before

JLR is simply making a lot of noise to create interest.
only LR is doing quite well commercially. and even them are living on ford investment (evoque, alumnium chassis from XJ for the range, XK chassis for the f-type, engines...)

new engine factory in UK, new factory in saudi arabia, new factory in china, new assembly line in india, new design studio in USA and china, new factory for the CX75, tenths of new cars for the next 4 years, thousands of new employees...it just sounds to good to be true.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Tuesday 11th December 2012
quotequote all
morgs_ said:
CraigyMc said:
crofty1984 said:
snaelro said:
it is not a surprise. from the beginning it was making no sense. especially when in parallel they announce to go down market with a 3 series
jaguar was simply too arrogant and selfconfident when they announced the production of this car.

they don't have the image of ferrari or porsche and they have never produced a true sportscar, only some sort of muscle car with big v8 and auto box only able to drift and smoke their tyres.
Apart from the C,D, and E-Type.
And the XJ220.
Give him a break, he's ony 12.

C
I have a parrot for Mr Snaelro! hehe

Craig, age is no excuse. I've had a model (exactly the same as in Chim's picture biggrin) since I was in single digits. I then stood and watched the real thing, drive into the car park of the site we were camping at for my first Le Mans Classic. I stood and drooled cloud9

I'm gutted that they have binned the C-X75, as others have said, the design is just gorgeous. One of the best for a while. It was one of those "stop and stare" moments for me.
My favourite Jaguar is missing from your list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_XK120

Snaelro, you might not know this but the car I'm linking to was the worlds fastest road car when it was released. As for the quote "They have never produced a real sportscar", by my reconing they had a large part in popularising the concept of the sportscar.

C