RE: Pic Of The Week: Aventador in London
Discussion
k if they get clamped and booked. What's it to them? pocket change.wst said:
It just looks weird, that picture, imo. Like the car is superimposed. It's too light underneath the car (rear left tyre) and... it just looks a bit uncanny valley.
I have to agree with you there Sir 
I doubt very much that Lambo was actually there at all.As eye catching as this image is
it looks heavily Photoshoped to my eye, as the lighting on the car appear very alien to the ambient lighting surrounding it + as you've mentioned the shadows under the car look odd. It's possible studio lighting was used outdoor to created that look.Good effort none the less and a nice touch with the Photographers name PHOTOSHOPED on the wall behind the car
Edited by MattCSLnut on Friday 14th December 14:31
MattCSLnut said:
I have to agree with you there Sir 
I doubt very much that Lambo was actually there at all.
As eye catching as this image is it looks heavily Photoshoped to my eye, as the lighting on the car appear very alien to the ambient lighting surrounding it + as you've mentioned the shadows under the car look odd. It's possible studio lighting was used outdoor to created that look.
Good effort none the less and a nice touch with the Photographers name PHOTOSHOPED on the wall behind the car
The car was actually there... The shadows are a bit weird due to the lights of other cars lighting up that area. I doubt very much that Lambo was actually there at all.As eye catching as this image is
it looks heavily Photoshoped to my eye, as the lighting on the car appear very alien to the ambient lighting surrounding it + as you've mentioned the shadows under the car look odd. It's possible studio lighting was used outdoor to created that look.Good effort none the less and a nice touch with the Photographers name PHOTOSHOPED on the wall behind the car
Edited by MattCSLnut on Friday 14th December 14:11
MattCSLnut said:
Penfolds said:
The car was actually there... The shadows are a bit weird due to the lights of other cars lighting up that area.
Fair enough mate that explains the cross lighting beneath the Lambo. Did you use any additional lighting and how much post productions work after ?Krikkit said:
If you look at the traffic lights they've changed while the shot is taken - so you've got cars on either side lighting everything up. How long was the exposure Alex?
5 seconds
Ah - some things never change. 45 Park Lane was the home of the original London Playboy Club. Mayfair seems to be the natural habitat of the Lamborghini. I remember walking the streets around this area in the early 80's as a 12 - 13 year old (my mum and dad had friends who lived in Curzon Street and I was allowed out with their son) and the streets were awash with Urracos and Espadas and other supercars of the time - Lagondas, Meraks and Khamsins. I vividly remember seeing a BMW M1 parked up near there as well. Never saw a Countach though. These memories never left me and I still love walking around that area and you always see some exotic metal (carbon-fibre?) as this photograph testifies.
Strupes, think you are on the wrong forum, maybe you ought to try tree huggers or the terrorist organisation brake.
Carl_Docklands said:
Fixed that for you.
An awesome piece of photography marred by the owners disregard for the rest of us.
Don't know the circumstance of the park, I will happily retract if proven otherwise. We see too many Lambos parked up like this with middle eastern plates.
I hope he gets clamped, not a good advert for lambo owners.
An awesome piece of photography marred by the owners disregard for the rest of us.
Don't know the circumstance of the park, I will happily retract if proven otherwise. We see too many Lambos parked up like this with middle eastern plates.
I hope he gets clamped, not a good advert for lambo owners.
Edited by Carl_Docklands on Friday 14th December 11:25
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff