RE: SOTW: Citroen Saxo VTR

RE: SOTW: Citroen Saxo VTR

Author
Discussion

J4CKO

41,628 posts

201 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
I always liked these, but they did get ruined a lot of the time and driven by tits.

Shame you cant get a C1 VTR, well you can, we have one but it is VTR in name only as it gets exactly the same underpinnings and engine as the rest of the range, a 100 bhp ish version.

I remember being in a 850 T5 and had a VTS all over me, I was in the way on the twisty stuff and even on the straight bits it did a lot better than I would have imagined, took a dual carriageway to pull any distance on it.

kayzee

2,819 posts

182 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
dbdb said:
Yet another hot hatch? - Not much variety on SOTW at the moment. frown
I'm sure its a great car, if you like this kind of thing.
Of the last 10, only 5 have been hatchbacks... plus they're the most fun you can have for this kinda money imo!

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Krikkit said:
Great little comedy shed - great handling, although the power and gearbox are odd bedfellows, because it's a revvy unit that's coupled to a hugely long gearbox. Either way, worth a punt. biggrin
The 8v isn't that revvy, although the FD is a bit long.
Mastodon2 said:
I didn't realise these had a redline at only 6100rpm.
Hits peak power at 5800rpm and I'm not sure where the fuel cut is but I'd be suprised if its below 6500rpm. Its revs out ok, no screamer though.

ADP68

528 posts

172 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
utterly chavtastic rubbish I'm afraid. Every teenage idiot in my area owns one of these, or a Corsa, with huge exhausts (the diameter of dustbins) and a cheap stereo that distorts the quality tunes they're playing. No thanks, despite the boot being useful for carrying the Staffie in.

Krikkit

26,538 posts

182 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Krikkit said:
Neither did I! 6100RPM is far too low for comedy, I love winding mine up past 7k. biggrin
You got an S2 Rallye?
Yes indeed. biggrin Yours looks nice, are you on the RR?

anything fast

983 posts

165 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
I am not saying this a bad car at all but where did the author get the performance stats from? These cars (when new) would get to 60 in a whisker under 10 seconds and would struggle to get past 115mph. Hardly 8 seconds ish and 120 mph (please do not post replies saying you did a 140mph in a 1.1 saxo as such stories always ignore the fact speedos are not accurate). Another note, these do not come in under 900kg, thats only the basic models, VTR is about 930kg and the VTS slighty heavier.

In presenting a SOTW there is no need to beef up the stats to make it look like more of a bargain. Its just a cheap run about and there are plenty of others out there to choose from.

the fact it a decent VTS can be had for under a £1000 so why bother with the 8V, by all accounts its not even economical.

note to shed, MUST TRY HARDER NEXT TIME!

only1ian

689 posts

195 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
The fact that the majority of positive responses about this SOTW are full of slang, text speak abbreviations and spelling mistakes says it all. Give me a shed barge any day of the week! Quality lasts.

Krikkit

26,538 posts

182 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Krikkit said:
Yes indeed. biggrin Yours looks nice, are you on the RR?
Not any more, do they still charge you something like £20 a year to use the forum?
Yep, drop in the ocean though tbh, it is a good club and full of great guys. What hillclimbs do you compete in? Have you seen Dave Patterson's car? (Although that's a different class to yours)

Chicane-UK

3,861 posts

186 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Had a VTR for about a year. Great little car.. but I wouldn't want to have an accident in it!

Mikeyplum

1,646 posts

170 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Mikeyplum said:
I miss my VTR frown was so much fun. A lot more fun than my Fiesta Zetec S actually, and a little bit quicker, considering it was 8v short of the Zetec S.

The rear disc brakes made it a little tail happy under heavy braking though. But I suppose that just added to the fun! biggrin

Nice to see a good, standard example for so little money. Got me thinking now scratchchin
Was it lowered at all?
Nope, apart from a pipercross cone filter, it was boggo stando biggrin. I would have liked to lower it, but I would have wanted to do it properly, which can be quite expensive for a Saxo, beleive it or not hehe

Bill Carr

2,234 posts

235 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Hateful little things. Yes, I've owned one. Awful driving position, terrible gearbox, things kept breaking all the time. Worst car I've owned by quite some margin.

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Chicane-UK said:
Had a VTR for about a year. Great little car.. but I wouldn't want to have an accident in it!
Crash test video

hehe

Top comments pretty funny too.

BREMBOV6

499 posts

149 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Used to always fancy a Mk1 VTS in racing green.

On another note why Bougicord over Sagem coils?

SuperHangOn

3,486 posts

154 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
I have low standards but I don't think I could bring myself to do it.

Can't imagine it being as good as a Puma anyway.


Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
There's no denying whatsoever that the majority of these are owned by ...well...the hoody types you see pottering around. You know, the yobbos...the type of happy go lucky smug faced git I was when I hit 17 and passed my test. biggrin

Either way, I'd never have one of these. No ABS in winter in a car that will happily take your legs off in a front end smash. Not that you factor in such events when buying a shed as they're probably all death traps! But the Pug 106 does have ABS and the 306 is safer still by virtue of it being larger.

I'm not saying all VTR/VTS drivers are chavs....but most of the ones I've seen seem to lean in that direction going from appearance alone.

Harsh judgement as they're probably decent people. Saying that, there's a hottie blonde local to me who has a blue 'Furio' with lexus lights. Awful car, lovely bum!

/pervemodeoff

stimpy888

13 posts

157 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
I had a VTS from new in 2001 and I've not owned a car since that I could drive at ten tenths like I did with that little thing. Scottish highland roads ended up being a maze of late night rally stages! I kept it totally standard and put 100,000 trouble free miles on it. I properly miss it.

nosittap

381 posts

146 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
anything fast said:
I am not saying this a bad car at all but where did the author get the performance stats from? These cars (when new) would get to 60 in a whisker under 10 seconds and would struggle to get past 115mph. Hardly 8 seconds ish and 120 mph (please do not post replies saying you did a 140mph in a 1.1 saxo as such stories always ignore the fact speedos are not accurate). Another note, these do not come in under 900kg, thats only the basic models, VTR is about 930kg and the VTS slighty heavier.

In presenting a SOTW there is no need to beef up the stats to make it look like more of a bargain. Its just a cheap run about and there are plenty of others out there to choose from.

the fact it a decent VTS can be had for under a £1000 so why bother with the 8V, by all accounts its not even economical.

note to shed, MUST TRY HARDER NEXT TIME!
You're right, the speedos are not accurate, on the autobahn last year mine was reading 130mph, sadly the GPS burst my bubble and revealed I was actually only going 124mph.

Over 10 months of ownership, mine has averaged over 42mpg (tank to tank measurements) mixed driving, the lowest I've seen in a normal month was 34mpg, and that was purely city driving, hardly uneconimical. The lowest I've seen was 21mpg and that was after 3 laps of the Nurburgring (clearly I wasn't trying hard enough)!

Why would anyone buy a VTR over a VTS/106Gti you ask? Insurance, it's half the insurance group, but is certainly not half the fun.

only1ian

689 posts

195 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Really? Got a couple of examples?

Or are you talking nonsense?
Only need one: "Michalins"

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
only1ian said:
Only need one: "Michalins"
Wow, that's a pretty weak argument. One person misspelt one word, by one letter. Therefore all Saxo owners are chavs.

Well done.
Not just one person, me! I've never owned a Saxo which my post explicitly points out. Undermines his point somewhat.

drgoatboy

1,626 posts

208 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Hellbound said:
No ABS in winter in a car that will happily take your legs off in a front end smash. Not that you factor in such events when buying a shed as they're probably all death traps! But the Pug 106 does have ABS and the 306 is safer still by virtue of it being larger.
Not quite true, my VTR had ABS, it came as part of a safety pack which also included side airbags...