RE: SOTW: Citroen Saxo VTR

RE: SOTW: Citroen Saxo VTR

Author
Discussion

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Wife had a VTS for 5 years. Would still have it now were it not for kiddies and Euro NCAP 2 stars...

Edited by r11co on Friday 21st December 12:16

nails1979

597 posts

142 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Our lass had one years ago. Bad driving position and pedal box. But still a canny car. Did over a 120000 trouble free miles. Always good on juice and managed to get almost 60mpg on a run to castle combe, Alton towers then Blackpool.
Sold it to a boy racer who had it weeks who then sold it straight on to another girl racer who wrapped it. Our lass was gutted.

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
... apart from it having the same name as a packet of salt?

Brand identity fail nerd


dbdb

4,326 posts

174 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
kayzee said:
dbdb said:
Yet another hot hatch? - Not much variety on SOTW at the moment. frown
I'm sure its a great car, if you like this kind of thing.
Of the last 10, only 5 have been hatchbacks... plus they're the most fun you can have for this kinda money imo!
It's four out of the last five though - which is quite a lot. smile

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
If it's French and doesn't have Rallye or Renaultsport on the back, I just don't wanna know!

coffee

petrolsniffer

2,461 posts

175 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Had one but the one I bought was an absolute shed had some horrible rot on the rear bumper crossmember it was so bad my mechanic brother warned me not to tow anything!

Very fun handling pedals took some getting used to never really went wrong in my short ownership.

I'd own another although I will be taking my brother to look with me.

I've seen clean looking mk1 vtr's for 500-600!

Edited by petrolsniffer on Friday 21st December 12:25

Drums

266 posts

143 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
I've owned 2 Saxos, a 1.1 and a lightly tweaked VTR, fantastic cars. Whilst I'm sure there's a lot of poor examples out there, i never found the stories about them being unreliable to be true. Did 60k in the little 1.1, and 10k in the VTR that was on 98k when i bought it, both were driven spiritedly and never missed a beat. I'd love another as a track car if i had the money!

vtr_driver

113 posts

199 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
As my user name probably gives away, I'm a fan.

I've had two VTR's one bog standard and the other lightly tweaked. Both were an absolute riot to drive. I learned more about controlling a FWD car driving those Saxo's than any other car could have taught me.

Understeer is easily manage with the throttle meaning momentum is always kept. I would have another tomorrow. In fact anyone want to but my dull Audi Estate?!

Nicholls22

57 posts

163 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Loved my Mk1 (99) VTR and 2002 VTS. VTR was nothing but problems, but always mananged to limp to my desired destination. In fairness I didn't exactly treat her well. Never got a full tank. Fuel light was constantly on, even after putting a fiver in (colledge days). Despite its flaws, I loved it and have no regrets buying it. Then, one hot day in my Rev1 MR2 T-bar, I came across this little one...I just had to have it...



I've Owned it three times now, and its still a great little car. Although, I did take it in part exchange this time. Still love driving it though!

VolvoT5

4,155 posts

175 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
I like it. Nippy, cheap to run and still looks good/fresh. Only downside is the chav following these cars have...... probably a bit expensive to insure as a result? Definitely wouldn't want to have a crash in one either.

Krikkit

26,538 posts

182 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Nicholls22 said:
*snip*
Oh dear, the rear suspension's collapsed? Oh, wait, it's only a pair of Lexus lights away from full chav spec. Having the arse dragging around like that ruins the handling, never mind being dangerously close to bottoming out!

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Nicholls22 said:
*snip*
Oh dear, the rear suspension's collapsed? Oh, wait, it's only a pair of Lexus lights away from full chav spec. Having the arse dragging around like that ruins the handling, never mind being dangerously close to bottoming out!
yes Best way to get these to handle is to sit the arse in the air and drop the front.

We may have a entrant for the badly modified cars thread hehe

Krikkit

26,538 posts

182 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
Krikkit said:
Nicholls22 said:
*snip*
Oh dear, the rear suspension's collapsed? Oh, wait, it's only a pair of Lexus lights away from full chav spec. Having the arse dragging around like that ruins the handling, never mind being dangerously close to bottoming out!
yes Best way to get these to handle is to sit the arse in the air and drop the front.

We may have a entrant for the badly modified cars thread hehe
Agreed - definitely. I've gone -40mm on mine front and back, but first attempt it was equal height front-rear and for the few miles it stayed like that the dullness of the handling was shocking. Back up to the right height now and wagging the tail about on greasy roundabouts. biggrin

ukaskew

10,642 posts

222 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Hellbound said:
the 306 is safer still by virtue of it being larger.
Say what? I thought the size = safety myth had been busted on many occasions?

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

149 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Wouldn't be seen dead in one, minus the fact that my feet are to big, the image that goes with them is shocking. There are 3 Saxo's my way (not noticed if they are VTR's or S's) but there all on the floor and all of the young lads driving them have the back rests wound so far back its like they think their on a lazy boy and you can just see there spotty little heads popping up past the door sill.

I don't doubt there fun but ive seen far too many of them backwards up a tree because they wind the back down so far and fit solid dampers and so completely ruin the handling because it induces extreme lift off.

Just to add, they all drive like c**ts.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

149 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
306 isn't that safe neither, i'm testament to that.

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
StottyZr said:
Krikkit said:
Nicholls22 said:
*snip*
Oh dear, the rear suspension's collapsed? Oh, wait, it's only a pair of Lexus lights away from full chav spec. Having the arse dragging around like that ruins the handling, never mind being dangerously close to bottoming out!
yes Best way to get these to handle is to sit the arse in the air and drop the front.

We may have a entrant for the badly modified cars thread hehe
Agreed - definitely. I've gone -40mm on mine front and back, but first attempt it was equal height front-rear and for the few miles it stayed like that the dullness of the handling was shocking. Back up to the right height now and wagging the tail about on greasy roundabouts. biggrin
Yep. A good friend of mine spent a few years in Saxmax, his words are "Saxos are the fastest when you're dragging the arse through corners" the back needs to be supple

dabofoppo

684 posts

172 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Great little cars I miss mine quite a lot but the 172 makes up for it. My old one was the most reliable car iv ever had Its on 145k now and still goes well.

Nicholls22

57 posts

163 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
Can't say i have had any danerous encouters with it being low in my time of owning it. Quite the oppoiste infact.

I will agree though, it is far too low.

Mikeyplum

1,646 posts

170 months

Friday 21st December 2012
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
... all of the young lads driving them have the back rests wound so far back its like they think their on a lazy boy and you can just see there spotty little heads popping up past the door sill.
I call bks on this statement.

From what I remember with my Saxo, the seat backs worked on a spring type lever, as opposed to a windy up wheel mechanism. So it could only be put back a to a certain angle, which was still very upright. I would say it might have only been mine, but I've been in more than one and they were all the same.