RE: Tell Me I'm Wrong: Aston Martin V8 Zagato

RE: Tell Me I'm Wrong: Aston Martin V8 Zagato

Author
Discussion

HAB

3,632 posts

228 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
Aston Martin generally does absolutely nothing for me at all. Apart from this one.

JREwing

17,540 posts

180 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
I would have one in my dream collection over any modern era Aston.

It has also not only held its value, but appreciated.

In fact, its looking like a pretty good investment. The even rarer volante version has gone up in value some 30-40% in the last couple of years.

This is a top car, to be driven by eccentric Brits who don't give a hoot about convention. You would never see a footballer driving one.
It's appreciated? Have you ever heard of inflation?
I would bet that it has depreciated.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
JREwing said:
toppstuff said:
I would have one in my dream collection over any modern era Aston.

It has also not only held its value, but appreciated.

In fact, its looking like a pretty good investment. The even rarer volante version has gone up in value some 30-40% in the last couple of years.

This is a top car, to be driven by eccentric Brits who don't give a hoot about convention. You would never see a footballer driving one.
It's appreciated? Have you ever heard of inflation?
I would bet that it has depreciated.
Nicholas Mee are asking £150k for a Zagato Volante right now. I attended a Bonhams auction some 3 years ago where a near identical car went for £75k plus costs.

There is quite wide price dispersion - another Aston dealer has one for sale at 99k, and Hexagon have one which is certainly around 130/150K I would say. These are very, very rare cars.

I'm looking at a Classic and Sportscar magazine from 2010 which also has a Zagato Volante at 90k. Curiously, the volante's were cheaper and less loved than the coupe's, even though they are even rarer. This situation no longer exists it seems. The market is'nt very liquid and they don't sell fast, but they do appear to sell given time.




TT Tim

4,162 posts

248 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
Ugly but fabulous, just like the Alfa SV.

Always wished I'd bough one when they were 'affordable'. :-(

|http://thumbsnap.com/APQVHPvq[/url]

[url]



Tim

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

283 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
Dr JonboyG said:
legalknievel said:
Personally my favourite was with the gullwing and rocket launcher conversion.

That's quite obviously a Camaro.
Haha, was going to comment this as well, but then I kept on reading through the thread...

Surprised no one pointed it out earlier that the model car is a Camaro smile

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

283 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
Alfanatic said:
A 348, Testarossa, Mondial and F40 look like four different cars. A 550 looked like a different car to a 456 and a 599 looked different to a 612. The Aston range looks like three or four different variations of the same car and has done so for years, even including the Rapide.
911/964/993/996/997/991. Rings a bell? biggrin

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

283 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
Audi make average cars for average money Porsche make the 911 because it's a classic shape.

There would be nothing wrong with AM making a modern DB5 but making DB7 and DB9 shaped cars year on year is just plain wrong lazy and sad, that' why AM ltd don't sell.

I call it as I see it.
So it's ok for Porsche to do the same over and over again, and that gets called a "classic shape", while designing cars on one of the nicest looking shapes in automotive history is "plain wrong lazy"?

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
I love the Zagato - my favourite Aston after the V8 Coupes and the DB4. A hint of Beta Coupe in there (not the ugliest of cars) and some great eighties detailing.

My favourite issue of CAR was December 1987, 'Setright Decides'. It was such an epic magazine back then. I haven't bought it for many years now.

BorkFactor

7,266 posts

159 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
I have said it before, but I honestly think that all Zagato do is ruin perfectly nice cars when they attempt to "improve" them. This one is no different IMO.

Probably not a very popular opinion! hehe

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
BorkFactor said:
I have said it before, but I honestly think that all Zagato do is ruin perfectly nice cars when they attempt to "improve" them. This one is no different IMO.

Probably not a very popular opinion! hehe
But a valid opinion nonetheless. Like that weird new Bowie single, the Zagato gets folk talking. I love it, many don't - however, whilst I wouldn't cross the road to look at a FoMoCo DB9 Vantage Daniel Craig Volante or one of its identikit replacements*, I would always give this honey a few moments of 'I wish' gawping time.

  • 9000 posts in 29 months internet masturbation freaks who knock one out over an AM keyring may again, take a different view. :-)

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
Even by ugly car standards, that's ugly. I never liked it back then either so at least I have been consistent.

cullenster

60 posts

148 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2013
quotequote all
I may well be shot down for this, but my favourite fantasy car of all time was the Aston Martin Lagonda Vignale shown at the 1993 Geneva Motor Show. It was designed by Scottish designer Moray Callum, whose brother, Ian, was designing the Aston Martin DB7 shown at the same motor show (and which got the lion's share of attention).

I loved the look of this car when it was originally shown. The swooping curves, the lack of distinct bumpers (reminiscent of a de-bumpered 60s race car like a Jag E-type or Aston DB5) and the amazing interior.

It was to be powered by Aston's (i.e. Ford's) modular V12 of the time and the show car was based on a Lincoln Town Car.

It is a long way from the next four-door that Aston produced, the Rapide, but with Bentley and RR enjoying a resurgence and even Mercedes going down the super-luxury route with the disastrous Maybach, there could have been a future for this car... but not in 1993.

Real shame.


iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2013
quotequote all
Blimey, I'd forgotten that. Looks like a more modern Riley Pathfinder tbh.

NotReallyBored

138 posts

145 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2013
quotequote all
I've always lusted after a V8 and an Alfa SZ. Scrub that, most Zagato creations do it for me. I'm no design expert or art lover, I just like 'different'. Though as an asides from the 'ugly' ones, the DB4 GT Zagato has to be one of the most stunning things ever penned.

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2013
quotequote all
iSore said:
Blimey, I'd forgotten that. Looks like a more modern Riley Pathfinder tbh.
More like a Rover 75.

I think I can come clean here and say I've never seen what the big thing is with Zagato. Full stop. Even the Fulvia Zagato was uglier than the car on which it was based. Most of his other work was largely a case of making a nice car look bad.

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2013
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
Yes ok for Porsche

and would also be ok for Aston Martin if they continued making evolving the DB5 but they decided to make a car which looked like a ford focus with a pinched nose and raked back screen and slitty lights. ie not an evolution of any Aston Martin.

The 911 is a evolution Porsche had a go at the Aston Martin route with the 944 but quickly realised that killing off the 911 would be suicide.

I wonder where Aston Martin would be today if they'd used the same formula as Porsche and evolved the DB5 the way Porsche evolved the 911?
It's different because the 911 had been in production for too long before they thought seriously about replacing it. It had literally taken root in the soul of Porsche. Aston replaced the DB5 after three years or so, and the whole DB line was only around for nine or ten years.

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

220 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2013
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
PascalBuyens said:
So it's ok for Porsche to do the same over and over again, and that gets called a "classic shape", while designing cars on one of the nicest looking shapes in automotive history is "plain wrong lazy"?
Yes ok for Porsche

and would also be ok for Aston Martin if they continued making evolving the DB5 but they decided to make a car which looked like a ford focus with a pinched nose and raked back screen and slitty lights. ie not an evolution of any Aston Martin.

The 911 is a evolution Porsche had a go at the Aston Martin route with the 944 but quickly realised that killing off the 911 would be suicide.

I wonder where Aston Martin would be today if they'd used the same formula as Porsche and evolved the DB5 the way Porsche evolved the 911?
But that's exactly what's happening with the DB9 shape. You say it's OK for the 911 but not the Aston. While I agree that the design of all modern Astons is awfully samey, they can't kill it while it has so much support. If they replace it with a less successful design that would be suicide, and your viewpoint about the design in itself is in the minority to be fair. Most observers think it's gorgeous. So they can't kill it. It would make no more sense than Caterham killing the Seven, or Morgan killing the Plus 4. They're design classics and are going to have an awfully long shelf life.

Porsche have the same problem with the 911, though at least they've been able to limit the damage to one model, not their whole range. The 928 (not 944) that was supposed to replace it still saw the light of day, just as a new model, and the 924 / 944, Boxster, Cayenne and Panamera have all managed to comfortably exist alongside the old icon. And just as Aston has detractors such as yourself (and I agree they all look too similar), Porsche has too. The joke that Porsche designers are the most overpaid - or underworked professionals in the world resurfaces with every new 911 model release, as do the old / new model Spot The Difference photos and so on.

Your opinion might be that the 911 is fine and the Aston range is not, but if you step back from that you'll notice that the 911 suffers the same criticism.

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2013
quotequote all
I don't see a problem with them all looking the same. they are clearly different and each offers the same iconic design in a slightly different flavour to cover the market. I look on it as one model with numerous variants which is really what the 911 is - and arguably the Panamera is just visually a longer 911, wherever it's engine may be.

I'd rather stick with a good looker than a new Ferrari minger.

Donkey62

227 posts

166 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Zagato Alfa best sounding cars in the world imho and this V8 Zagato is only other i could live with looks wise reminds me of 80's suits with complete with shoulder pads
and on very rare occasion it look good on a solitary sole for everyone else it didn't fit here Zagato fitted in very well.