RE: Chris Harris video: fast Volvos

RE: Chris Harris video: fast Volvos

Author
Discussion

bp1000

873 posts

180 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
The ISF, XFR and now this, all very very capable outsiders to the super saloon small and large crown. It keeps BMW and Mercedes on their toes pushing for more innovation and development, it can only be a good thing.

We need to keep the super saloon alive, I'm worrying that ISF and xfr sales figures are going to constrict budgets on these cars in the future, especially in the case of the xfr which is phenomenal. Time will tell how long we see developments from these other manufacturers in a comparatively small uk market.

I'm not just talking about shelving them, I'm talking about real innovation and technology instead of being stuck with the same baseline configuration for years to come. Budgets are spent on hybrid alternative fuel innovation which is already hitting production lines for most manufacturers. Makes me sad for the future or real big engined evolution.


MX7

7,902 posts

175 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
TinyCappo said:
wont happen for £60k there has to be nearly £15k in OHLINS alone.
Didn't the V70R have Ohlins?

Anjin1222

6 posts

167 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Must be a psychological weakness but I have a thing about mad Scandinavians -on one hand I want one of these! Had an S60R for a few years but had to give it up, but also a Subaru Forester 2.5 as well after that, and to be honest I'd probably go for the Forester again - after all, I don't think the Volvo would be much good in 6" of mud. The s60 certainly wasn't.

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
The Obeast said:
Holy Crap!!

What was that ovlov packing?
I assume it's this one

http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2012/03/sweden-cooles...

In which case it's a Volvo-racecar sourced 2.5 V6 which they've upped to just under 800hp (presumably using a turbo the size of a medium sized dog)!?!?

It cool as fk as was, reputedly, up-for-sale for around one-and-a-half Mark Hales engine rebuilds smile

jdleeso

71 posts

285 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Owning a V50 Polestar I can say the extra performance is a big improvement over the std. More importantly most people just think its a std v50 in a slightly bright red colour.

Not much good in snow with 18 inch, 45 profile tires however.

If they are the right price they will sell as ergonomics are very good and sometimes you just get bored with BMWs and Mercs.


Trevor M

57 posts

146 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
What this car would do is draw more late 30ish men to the brand. Volvo would be very smart to put this into production. Volvo S60 buyers have a higher income and education than BMW 3 buyers, and skew more towards women than men like the 3 does. Source: Forbes. If Volvo made this more "masculine" version of the 60, there is probably no doubt they'd scoop quite a number of the wealthier and smarter men who were thinking of buying an M3, but really like the idea of not following the herd with their choice of performance sedan and want something a little special, and don't want to be associated with quite a number of M3 drivers. Convincing AMG C63 buyers to switch will probably prove more difficult, but not impossible.

On another note, how is it that one car manufacturer can build a great sounding engine with a turbo, while the turbo on another manufacturer's car makes it sound like a vacuum cleaner?

Finlandia

7,803 posts

232 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
The Obeast said:
rottie102 said:
That's not a fast VOLVO!

THIS is a fast VOLVO smile

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...
Holy Crap!!

What was that ovlov packing?

On topic love the S60. I may be in the minority but I think that colour is stunning, especially when you see the sunlight hit it in the video
800 Hp biggrin

packman10_4

245 posts

195 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all

Love the colour and the brand , i think they would be silly not taking the Germans on big style. Volvo did sell a lot of 850R's and the like back in the
day so come on Volvo let see what you can do if you get the price right @50k you could well be on to a winner .......

smilo996

2,804 posts

171 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Good for Volvo. Proper Manual box, V6 turbo, no sea of black in zee cabin, great looking car.
When was Merc actaully made a really good looking car? It will also be cheaper that zee Germans if they made them in volume and in that guise much faster. Volvo's are usually pretty reliable and understated. What is not to like?
XC90 Polestar?

Monty Python

4,812 posts

198 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
(Cue Dutch accent)

So it's not only the Dutch who can do crazy things...

Afraid the idea of a massive turbo doesn't do it for me - seems a bit of a poor man's way of extracting more power from an engine. Perhaps they should have used a supercharger or sequential turbo setup or simply the V8 from the XC90 as Noble has done.

Either way, thumbs up for actually doing it.

Alfa159Ti

828 posts

158 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
My old man had an old T5 Estate years ago with a CB ariel on the roof.

Traffic would just melt out of the way on the motorway thinking he was CID.

I still remember as a kid being in the back and asking him to boot it. Even at motorway speeds and with a car-full, the acceleration could pin you in the seat.

Epic car. Since that time I haven't seen a single Volvo that is even vaguely interesting to me.

Hopefully if they get this Polestar thing right they might get back to making cars that are actually desirable to people other than accountants and those of a certain religious persuasion!

gumsie

680 posts

210 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
f328nvl said:
I have a 2012 c63 Amg performance pack that cost 72k and i drove it in the snow today, from St. Albans to Cambridge and back. It was relaxing and swift. However, I certainly wouldn't specify it at as it is. I'd save nearly 6k and have a cheaper better AMG: as for 200k volvos, whatever next? £1m Lexus? A kidney for a skoda? Two testicles for an Vauxhall? This is utter, utter nonsense. (And I'm no unalloyed fan of my own car). You might as well compare Thrust2 to a Ferrari California. If they build it, I'll vote for MIlliband.

Www.rjmghome.blogspot.com

Edited by f328nvl on Wednesday 23 January 22:03


Edited by f328nvl on Wednesday 23 January 22:12
That's odd. I have a 2012 C350. Not terribly impressive in the snow. I'm surprised that yours was as you describe given its no doubt stiffer set up and wider probably more 'dry tarmac' orientated tyres.

gumsie

680 posts

210 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Trevor M said:
What this car would do is draw more late 30ish men to the brand. Volvo would be very smart to put this into production. Volvo S60 buyers have a higher income and education than BMW 3 buyers, and skew more towards women than men like the 3 does. Source: Forbes. If Volvo made this more "masculine" version of the 60, there is probably no doubt they'd scoop quite a number of the wealthier and smarter men who were thinking of buying an M3, but really like the idea of not following the herd with their choice of performance sedan and want something a little special, and don't want to be associated with quite a number of M3 drivers. Convincing AMG C63 buyers to switch will probably prove more difficult, but not impossible.

On another note, how is it that one car manufacturer can build a great sounding engine with a turbo, while the turbo on another manufacturer's car makes it sound like a vacuum cleaner?
Does sound very much better than I though it would even though the 63 sounds miles better, (admittedly no turbo). I don't get the comparison though. Ice and snow on the road and it's 4WD vs 2WD ???
Why not use an Audi?

I'm more surprised that Harris described the 63 as the best small saloon on the market. Has the M3 officially lost its crown?

Edited by gumsie on Thursday 24th January 08:29

Contigo

3,113 posts

210 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
The way it pulled away from the C63 was might impressive as it's one quick car. Let's hope this is put into mass production.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
I never thought that 20 years ago I'd be saying that the mid-class Volvo was the best looking in its class but it really is.

ST150HB

446 posts

150 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
What an awesome machine. Volvo are definitely onto something with this!

Ferosferio

285 posts

151 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
The price is irrelevant, really: It's a concept.

I, for one, think it looks great and it sounds even better - Perhaps this is controversial but I'd be inclined to choose 6 cylinder noise over V8 anyway.

MX7

7,902 posts

175 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Ferosferio said:
The price is irrelevant, really: It's a concept.
Not really.

"Normally these things are concept cars, but Polestar is selling a tiny batch"

pSyCoSiS

3,604 posts

206 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
That is a seriously rapid car.

I like it.

Those C63 Mercs are not slow, but this made it look slow!

StonetheCrows

769 posts

209 months

Thursday 24th January 2013
quotequote all
Are the DRL's linked to the traction control or is my hangover worse than I thought