RE: Spotted: BMW 320Si

Author
Discussion

S3_Graham

12,830 posts

200 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Usget said:
The trouble with this car is that they could have made it so much better. "If we're going to do a homologation special, then let's do it properly, Fritz," they could have said.

Instead, to all intents and purposes, it's a normal 320i with some nice wheels.

So no, it's not the spiritual successor to the E30 M3.
Its not though is it really. Its got a different cylinder bore etc to make it more revvy in the high end, its got a carbon engine cover and other bits to make the C of G lower.

Whether all those tiny mods make a difference is where the point lies, I suspect the difference is marginal but I do like the idea! As has been said, its more like the E30 and E36 318is than a full blown M3!

I bet it doesnt have an LSD and they couldnt up the power to 200bhp or something.

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

215 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
s m said:
Don't quite a few of these develop 'engine problems' - often resulting in a new engine?
They do indeed.

Personally I wouldn't give the steam off my piss for one of these, the certainly aren't anything like an E30 M3.

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

169 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
I guess I didn't win you all over then! biglaugh

Gave it a good shot mind. I'd run one in an instant (yes, I have driven one too) but each to his own and all that.

Dan

braddo

10,505 posts

189 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Sounds an interesting car.

Autocar article here: http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/bmw/3-series/f...

... states it was sold for LESS than the standard 320i. It also had larger brakes to go with the engine mods.

There is no point comparing it to older M3s etc. It is a 2006 E90 for £10k but is a much more interesting buy than the equivalent 320i/320d at around the same price.

Not all homologation specials were like an Integrale Evo. Some were much closer to this 320si in terms of how much they differed from the base production car.

If you're not after (or, for example, can't insure) a high performance car this looks like an interesting alternative to the warm hatches and equivalent diesels that those buyers might be looking at.

dibblecorse

6,882 posts

193 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Dan Trent said:
I guess I didn't win you all over then! biglaugh

Gave it a good shot mind. I'd run one in an instant (yes, I have driven one too) but each to his own and all that.

Dan
Dan, playing devils advocate, why ?

BBS-LM

3,972 posts

225 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
simonigrale said:
Shouldn't a homologation car look like this ?

hehe

Devil2575

13,400 posts

189 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evocarreviews/2005...

I like it and so did EVO when they reviewed it.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

189 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
dibblecorse said:
Dan Trent said:
I guess I didn't win you all over then! biglaugh

Gave it a good shot mind. I'd run one in an instant (yes, I have driven one too) but each to his own and all that.

Dan
Dan, playing devils advocate, why ?
He wasn't was he?

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

204 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
I looked at these before I bought my 325i, wheels apart I'm glad I bought the 6 cylinder car, the si doesn't really make much sense to me.

s m

23,241 posts

204 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
boy said:
s m said:
Don't quite a few of these develop 'engine problems' - often resulting in a new engine?
They do indeed.

Personally I wouldn't give the steam off my piss for one of these, the certainly aren't anything like an E30 M3.
I looked into them but considering the small number of cars there appear to be a lot that had engine replacements due to alloy liner cracking. Some are on their third engine at 90k and they have full BMW SH.
There were quite a lot of software updates done and the valve clearances need to be checked frequently.
Not saying don't buy one but certainly check the engine carefully.

myhandle

1,194 posts

175 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
MiseryStreak said:
Yeah, a spiritual successor to the E30 M3, except for the fact that the 20 year older car had much more power, a lot less weight and a whole heap more desirability.
It's a spiritual successor to the E36 M 318is , which was another homologation special. That one had an M3-esque body kit, a slightly raised rear spoiler, but did not have M3 mirrors or M3 alloys. On the rubbing strip (M3 thickness rather than 318i narrow) in the position that the E36 M3 had a small M3 logo the M 318is had a little Motorsport flag logo which I thought looked OK. CAR magazine gave it a warm-ish review at the time (1994), but like the 320si it was not extremely fast, and was reasonably pricy.

http://www.google.com/search?q=M318is+E36&rlz=...

http://www.google.com/search?q=M318is+E36&rlz=...

kambites

67,584 posts

222 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
s m said:
Some are on their third engine at 90k and they have full BMW SH.
yikes That's worse than a TVR! hehe

FlavaDave

213 posts

160 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Im not sure what this article is about... Was a struggle to read, too.

Antj

1,049 posts

201 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Froomee said:
The wheels are lovely, i regularly see s 1 series locally with them on.....
they were also standard on the 130i LE a runout special 3dr

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Interesting. I didn't even know the Si existed.

s m

23,241 posts

204 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
s m said:
Some are on their third engine at 90k and they have full BMW SH.
yikes That's worse than a TVR! hehe
I do quite like the premise behind them and even had a test drive when new as I was offered one after showing an interest.
However, I would suggest, as the engines are rare on secondhand market, checking the engine over thoroughly. There seems to be a high percentage of engine failures without being alarmist. Unlike a Nicasil 328i block where you can get a replacement cheapish, I don't think you would have such an option with a 320Si

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=525...

Edited by s m on Wednesday 30th January 12:31

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

169 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
dibblecorse said:
Dan, playing devils advocate, why ?
Maybe I'm the sap I described in my own intro to the piece but I just love the bloody mindedness of going ahead and building a car that made no marketing sense, is an impossible sell on the performance numbers compared with others in the same range and is basically a bog-standard saloon with a really trick engine whose attributes bear no relevance to road driving whatsoever. And I love the wheels. nerd I'm stubborn enough to like a car purely on the basis that most people don't get it too!

Maybe I'm just being a bit rose-tinted and/or deliberately eccentric. But there's just a huge amount that appeals to the inner geek in *me* and I thought I'd try and sell the case with a bit of a yarn.

Didn't really succeed in that, as it goes! biggrin

Dan

SpudLink

5,844 posts

193 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evocarreviews/2005...

I like it and so did EVO when they reviewed it.
They make it sound pretty interesting. Maybe it has to be driven to be appreciated.

Paul M

367 posts

205 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
"It could, at a push, even be considered the nearest BMW has ever actually come to building a spiritual successor to the E30 M3"

No, it was never (to my recollection)marketed as such so not sure how the author has come to that opinion.

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

204 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Didn't VBH drive one to test a G force meter or something?