RE: Ferrari F150 vs McLaren P1: PH Blog

RE: Ferrari F150 vs McLaren P1: PH Blog

Author
Discussion

C36 Nico

753 posts

138 months

Monday 4th March 2013
quotequote all
Good points and you made me want a koeningsegg slightly more hehe

But personally I dont want a turboed supercar. Others do though, and thats fine too..

007 VXR

64,187 posts

188 months

Monday 4th March 2013
quotequote all
C36 Nico said:
Koeningsegg need to make an NA engine and develop another shell rather than that UGLY CCX model which has been rehashed for 10 years now. Until then no ta
Porsche 911 then wink

hehe

C36 Nico

753 posts

138 months

Monday 4th March 2013
quotequote all
Ferrari are as much fiat as a lamborghini is an audi.... actually make that less since afaik audi shares far more bin parts with their italian brothers..

C36 Nico

753 posts

138 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
GAME.SET.MATCH Ferrari smile

stew-S160

8,006 posts

239 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
C36 Nico said:
GAME.SET.MATCH Ferrari smile
Clearly on drugs, or blind.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
C36 Nico said:
GAME.SET.MATCH Ferrari smile
What? A bloated rehash of current designs with a name so stupid it defies belief?

I am totally, utterly underwhelmed.

The most "meh" since the word "meh" was invented.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
stew-S160 said:
C36 Nico said:
GAME.SET.MATCH Ferrari smile
Clearly on drugs, or blind.
I think he's doing a word association game.

Game, set, match, ferrari, petrol, fireball, run, handcuffs, prison...

kayzee

2,819 posts

182 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Soap-on-a-rope...

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
kayzee said:
Soap-on-a-rope...
Skinheads...

Guvernator

13,166 posts

166 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
C36 Nico said:
GAME.SET.MATCH Ferrari smile
Have to agree with this tbh, Mclaren just got shown how to make a hypercar.

RobGT81

5,229 posts

187 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Have to agree with this tbh, Mclaren just got shown how to make a hypercar.
No replacement for displacement! Especially when its a V12 that does 9250rpm!

Caractacus

2,604 posts

226 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
RobGT81 said:
No replacement for displacement!
Stuck in 1963?

Guvernator

13,166 posts

166 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
RobGT81 said:
Guvernator said:
Have to agree with this tbh, Mclaren just got shown how to make a hypercar.
No replacement for displacement! Especially when its a V12 that does 9250rpm!
Exactly, I can't believe people think a V8 which cheats by using turbo's and has 300 kilos of batteries to lug around can in any way compare to a screaming V12 NA which produces 800bhp on it's own and that's just one area where they've been well and truly spanked.

I seriously assumed the Ferrari would be prettier but that Mclaren given their engineering expertise would be better technically but on first impressions, they've been well and truely spanked on both fronts.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Have to agree with this tbh, Mclaren just got shown how to make a hypercar.
If it was 1995 maybe. This is 2013. The P1 looks like it comes from NOW, rather than yesterday. And no-one with any taste in their bones is going to buy a car called a Laugh-errari.



StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
C36 Nico said:
Koeningsegg need to make an NA engine and develop another shell rather than that UGLY CCX model which has been rehashed for 10 years now. Until then no ta
Do you know much about Koenigsegg?

http://www.koenigsegg.com/models/agera-r/

Thats the Agera R, the engine produces 1140hp and weighs less than 200kg IIRC. Do you have any concept of how impressive that is?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp_qxKWMsVw

Watch that 30minute video before mentioning again Koenigsegg please.

Guvernator

13,166 posts

166 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
C36 Nico said:
Koeningsegg need to make an NA engine and develop another shell rather than that UGLY CCX model which has been rehashed for 10 years now. Until then no ta
Do you know much about Koenigsegg?

http://www.koenigsegg.com/models/agera-r/

Thats the Agera R, the engine produces 1140hp and weighs less than 200kg IIRC. Do you have any concept of how impressive that is?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp_qxKWMsVw

Watch that 30minute video before mentioning again Koenigsegg please.
Don't mean to rain on your parade slightly but the Koenigsegg engine is a twin turbo setup where it's quite a bit easier to get those sorts of power levels, the Skyline and Supra tuners have been doing it for over 10 years. It is certainly still a very impressive package but certainly not as difficult to do as a high power NA engine.

StottyZr

6,860 posts

164 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
StottyZr said:
C36 Nico said:
Koeningsegg need to make an NA engine and develop another shell rather than that UGLY CCX model which has been rehashed for 10 years now. Until then no ta
Do you know much about Koenigsegg?

http://www.koenigsegg.com/models/agera-r/

Thats the Agera R, the engine produces 1140hp and weighs less than 200kg IIRC. Do you have any concept of how impressive that is?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp_qxKWMsVw

Watch that 30minute video before mentioning again Koenigsegg please.
Don't mean to rain on your parade slightly but the Koenigsegg engine is a twin turbo setup where it's quite a bit easier to get those sorts of power levels, the Skyline and Supra tuners have been doing it for over 10 years. It is certainly still a very impressive package but certainly not as difficult to do as a high power NA engine.
Going to throw out an obvious question here and ask why other manufacturers haven't done it?

DonkeyApple

55,429 posts

170 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
It's good that the reveal is polarising views with more clarity.

I have to say that I was in neither particular camp and was looking forward to the F150 reveal but just saw the nose from a Lambo and not much else to genuinely excite. There's no doubt at all that it's a good looking car but my first impression is that it really doesn't bring anything new to the table in looks etc.

At this stage I do think the P1 has it. But it's all down to how it evolves in the mind over the coming days.

JustNeil

636 posts

228 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
Rich_W said:
JustNeil said:
I get the feeling that they are two different cars for two different purposes. Depends if you're buying a car, or a badge really.

The P1 will be a drivers car, small, reliable and relatively easy to drive, which means it'll get used regularly (hopefully)

The F150 or whatever it's going to be called will be a big, wide, shouty primadonna that will be seen parked up in Monaco when the Formula 1 is there, and then go back into it's air conditioned box until next year, along with the F40, F50 and Enzo that also never get driven.

If you want to drive, get a P1. If you want to be looked at, get the Ferrari.

Guess where my money's going...
Yes because apparently a F458 is impossible to live with. Your assumption that Ferrari's are hard to live with is wrong. Old Lambos, yes I'd be with you. But modern Fezzas are just as modern as the competition and just as useable. Neither F150 or P1 or F1 are everyday cars in any case. Even Rowan Atkinson has a Golf laugh
No, my point was not that Ferraris are hard to live with, but that Ferrari owners (especially those of their F40, F50, Enzo hyper cars) are rarely seen driving them and are, in the main, paranoid about actually using them for fear of increasing the mileage. I don't see anyone tlaking about wanting to take their Enzo to 100k miles, like RA with his F1, for example.

Although, to be honest, given the way it looks, if I had a 'LaFerrari' I'd probably hide it in the garage too. It's awful!

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Wednesday 6th March 2013
quotequote all
JustNeil said:
No, my point was not that Ferraris are hard to live with, but that Ferrari owners (especially those of their F40, F50, Enzo hyper cars) are rarely seen driving them and are, in the main, paranoid about actually using them for fear of increasing the mileage. I don't see anyone tlaking about wanting to take their Enzo to 100k miles, like RA with his F1, for example.

Although, to be honest, given the way it looks, if I had a 'LaFerrari' I'd probably hide it in the garage too. It's awful!
Totally agree. This is one of the main problems I have with Ferrari. They are ( mostly ) garage queens. And the market thinks the same thing. Low mileage is super, super important. Try selling a 458 with 40,000 miles on it back to your dealer and prepare to have your trousers pulled down. This does not happen to the same extent with Porsche, for example...