RE: Alfa Romeo '5 Series' planned

RE: Alfa Romeo '5 Series' planned

Author
Discussion

pagani1

683 posts

203 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Yes please. Lets have an Alfa 4 seater

SprintSpeciale

432 posts

146 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
veevee said:
Won't sell any. Too many other decent competitors. Stick to small, efficient and faux sporty.
If it looks good and has a half decent ride, I would buy one. There are some of us who still believe that there is more to life than efficient dynamics, vorsprung durch technic and any other old cobblers designed to make boring metal sound exciting. And we'll put our money where our mouth is, notwithstanding crap MPG, high CO2 and st residuals. In the land that time forgot, I believe it was called being a petrolhead..

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
SprintSpeciale said:
If it looks good and has a half decent ride, I would buy one. There are some of us who still believe that there is more to life than efficient dynamics, vorsprung durch technic and any other old cobblers designed to make boring metal sound exciting. And we'll put our money where our mouth is, notwithstanding crap MPG, high CO2 and st residuals. In the land that time forgot, I believe it was called being a petrolhead..
About 20 years ago, maybe. But current safety and emissions regs mean that any new Alfa will have a droning four pot, a raft of diesels, FWD, over servoed brake and soft feel plastics as well as generic 'beaufiful' Alfa styling so that buyers can 'stand out from the crowd*'.
Sadly, the days when Alfas were exciting have long gone so you can forget about the howl of a V6 or the sound of a pair of 40DCOE's, a mechanical feeling gearchange, odd driving postion or comedy instruments - the stuff that made an Alfa really different. Cars like the Sud, Alfetta, 75 etc, cars you didn't exactly buy for their incredible good looks but because of what they were under the skin. Sadly, 2013's car buyer doesn't give a st.




  • Because that is SO important now.

SprintSpeciale

432 posts

146 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
iSore said:
About 20 years ago, maybe. But current safety and emissions regs mean that any new Alfa will have a droning four pot, a raft of diesels, FWD, over servoed brake and soft feel plastics as well as generic 'beaufiful' Alfa styling so that buyers can 'stand out from the crowd*'.
Sadly, the days when Alfas were exciting have long gone so you can forget about the howl of a V6 or the sound of a pair of 40DCOE's, a mechanical feeling gearchange, odd driving postion or comedy instruments - the stuff that made an Alfa really different. Cars like the Sud, Alfetta, 75 etc, cars you didn't exactly buy for their incredible good looks but because of what they were under the skin. Sadly, 2013's car buyer doesn't give a st.




  • Because that is SO important now.
The topic of conversation was whether a large, V6 powered, rear-wheel drive Alfa would sell or not. I wouldn't buy one if it was a front wheel drive diesel, but that was not the premise.

And as a regular driver of a Giulietta Cloverleaf (as well as a 50 year old Alfa), I can confirm that the awful driving position and comedy instruments live on.

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
SprintSpeciale said:
veevee said:
Won't sell any. Too many other decent competitors. Stick to small, efficient and faux sporty.
If it looks good and has a half decent ride, I would buy one. There are some of us who still believe that there is more to life than efficient dynamics, vorsprung durch technic and any other old cobblers designed to make boring metal sound exciting. And we'll put our money where our mouth is, notwithstanding crap MPG, high CO2 and st residuals. In the land that time forgot, I believe it was called being a petrolhead..
I agree. All the German offerings, bar perhaps Audi, are now really ugly slabwagens. I know Alfa still have to comply with the safety regs that make a Morris Minor height bonnet mandatory these days but we can still pray they will do something beautiful. Back in the 70s, the Fiat 130 Coupe was a style benchmark when they didn't equate style with how much they could charge for it or limit it to "premium marques".

One would hope that they would then use the RWD platform to kick the ruined Lancia/Chryser 300 into touch as that is now fairly laughable in it's price bracket though it would probably just rob sales from the Alfa so maybe they could just drop it.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
infradig said:
Just keep your fingers crossed they don't use the Fiat groups other rwd, 5series sized, 'executive' V6 diesel as the basis for the Alfa. I love mine but it would be a travesty of an Arna scale to use 1990's Merc underpinnings on an Alfa.
They will most likely base it on the new Maserati Ghibli

Benjamonk

94 posts

196 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
k-ink said:
It will no doubt be lovely. It will be well built. It won't rust. It won't go wrong, just like all the Alfa's I've previously owned - both new and old. Then people who have never owned an Alfa on here will moan that it will not be well built and it will rust. Then they will go and buy diesel BMWs like everyone else. I'll avoid this thread as it will be 99% BS as per usual form.
Now ain't that the truth. I do get bored of all this b****cks spouted about how unreliable Alfa Romeo's are. Like you, i've had 6 in total and enjoyed all of them for different reasons. Build quality might not quite have been up to Mercedes (when merc still built cars properly) but it was always way better than any ford, vauxhall, volvo or indeed jaguar that i've ever owned.

And for doubters about sales appeal. As a boring exec type who needs a family sized car to eat up the motorway my choices today are 5 series or E class.... Maybe an A6?

here's to my new Alfa Romeo then. A car i will be proud to get out of, a car that i will love because of the way it makes me feel. A car that i will buy not giving a flying **** what the neighbours think about it.

funwithrevs

594 posts

196 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Wow, is 190hp all the V6 3.0 produced?
No, 190 is what my old V plate 166 with a 2.5 V6 produces.

I would expect a 2008 car to have the later injection system as well as the extra half a litre, so ~220 sounds about right. Mind you, I thought the later models were 3.2l 240bhp, so not sure what is happening with that one in the advert.

They also create a lovely noise and a big grin all the way up to 7K rpm, not bad for a cheap barge smile

Pr1964

1,362 posts

162 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Maybe if they could build one with BMW Audi or Mercedes underpinnings ......

Otherwise forget it would just be another fragile unreliable half arsed saloon.


radio man

202 posts

175 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
that car looks absolutely fantastic and if they were to make it like that without too much dumbing down I would put an order in tomorrow

Grandfondo

12,241 posts

207 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
Maybe if they could build one with BMW Audi or Mercedes underpinnings ......

Otherwise forget it would just be another fragile unreliable half arsed saloon.
rolleyes

Twoshoe

856 posts

185 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
Maybe if they could build one with BMW Audi or Mercedes underpinnings ......

Otherwise forget it would just be another fragile unreliable half arsed saloon.
'fragile unreliable and half arsed' eh? I've had 5 164s and 2 166s (oh, and 3 156s and a GT), in which I've covered about 1/3 of a million miles. In all that time, apart from a few punctures, the only problem I had was with a battery failing.

The battery was German, btw.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
Maybe if they could build one with BMW Audi or Mercedes underpinnings ......

Otherwise forget it would just be another fragile unreliable half arsed saloon.
Most ill informed post of the day!

mikEsprit

828 posts

187 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Are the slit headlights viable?

Baron Greenback

6,998 posts

151 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I love the look just hope they make the rear as nice as the front. Don't like the rear of any Alfa for along time. Loving my 159 at the moment just clocked 105k mileage and nothing gone wrong bar 1 parking sensors. Going to drive it longer the my last VW 197k.

ukmike2000

476 posts

169 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I'm guessing that any car that looked like a nicer and more modern Rapide, with Maserati underpinnings, is going to be selling in the £50k+ area. It is a gorgeous thing and would go well, but in this UK premium market, the company car driver is king and how many Purchasing Fleet Managers are going to stick their necks out to buy an Alfa for the Marketing Manager when the prediction of residuals is so poor.

I hope it will still happen, because I like the design of the concept - but Mr Marchionne changes his mind as often as his underwear and currently he is under pressure to get ANY sales going, let alone a niche premium saloon. I could be dead before it comes to fruition.

I owned a 159 from new for 18 months - a diesel, and in spite of its dramatic looks it was a well built, nicely trimmed but dynamically quite average car, and a faint shadow of the 156 I'd owned a few years earlier. It is a sad fact that Alfa saloons have been neutered by the demands of emissions and safety, and are not nearly as sporting as they should and could be.

Edited by ukmike2000 on Tuesday 26th March 18:16

I WISH

874 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
The 159 is a very handsome beast indeed .... made even more desirable by its relative scarcity ...and the 166 was lovely too.

If they build something that retains even 90% of the concept it should sell like hot cakes (hopefully!).

sperm

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I would love to see Alfa re-enter this market, but there's some pretty stiff competition there already.

Jimbo.

3,950 posts

190 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
funwithrevs said:
No, 190 is what my old V plate 166 with a 2.5 V6 produces.

I would expect a 2008 car to have the later injection system as well as the extra half a litre, so ~220 sounds about right. Mind you, I thought the later models were 3.2l 240bhp, so not sure what is happening with that one in the advert.

They also create a lovely noise and a big grin all the way up to 7K rpm, not bad for a cheap barge smile
The Sportronics only ever had the 3.0 V6 IIRC. The 3.2 in the facelift cars was only ever available in manual.

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
mikEsprit said:
Are the slit headlights viable?
Not down there I suspect, no. They look too low down to get type approval.