RE: Chris Harris video: Renaultsport Clio 200 Turbo
Discussion
Technomatt said:
Your mathematical analysis is impeccable Vambo.
Many people are not experienced in translating small time segments into physical distances and real world performance advantages.
all depends on what you base a car length....Many people are not experienced in translating small time segments into physical distances and real world performance advantages.
anyway unlike some troll that only posts in certain threads to have a go and when it suits change their mind one minutes its rubbish the next its brilliant...
you missed the point - it was stated the new had more power and the old less but only a 0.6sec or so difference....go figure out what was said!!!
foxspeed said:
all depends on what you base a car length....
anyway unlike some troll that only posts in certain threads to have a go and when it suits change their mind one minutes its rubbish the next its brilliant...
you missed the point - it was stated the new had more power and the old less but only a 0.6sec or so difference....go figure out what was said!!!
A delayed Troll input.anyway unlike some troll that only posts in certain threads to have a go and when it suits change their mind one minutes its rubbish the next its brilliant...
you missed the point - it was stated the new had more power and the old less but only a 0.6sec or so difference....go figure out what was said!!!
Can any one translate this into the Queens English?
You have already been shown the door regarding acceleration differentials.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff