RE: Mazda RX-8: PH buying guide

RE: Mazda RX-8: PH buying guide

Author
Discussion

tombstone

202 posts

213 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
I have a 231 RX8, and a former Mazda tech..so a glutton for punishment! A lot of people have opinions on what is best for an RX8, buy one with a knackered lump, pay for a motor rebuild with warranty and enjoy a well balanced, four seat sports car. Sure it's not massively fast, but a nice, sorted RWD car.
I mix a little 2-stroke synthetic oil with the fuel, replaced the coils, leads, plugs when I got it, and bought if from a dealer with a years warranty.
Few little gremlins to add, coolant sensor can give erratic readings (most cars should be sorted now), headlight leveling sensor link rods can snap, cars modified with ebay bits can be more trouble than they're worth..
I've seen a few with shagged engines after de-catting, genuine Mazda cats seem to flow the best, avoid cars with budget tyres, will handle like bambi on roller skates.. designed to run Bridgestones, but good sensible tyres a must.
Yes, I rag the nuts off it, shut it down always when hot, but even after 35,000 miles, my engine still has great compression.
Ignition failures are the biggest killer, sometimes hard to feel a misfire, so consider ignition coils an annual replacement etc.
VW do their Synta oil, to same spec as Dexila Mazda oil, for £12.50+vat per 5L on trade special offer, so cheap enough for 2000-3000 mile oil changes.

carinaman

21,298 posts

172 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Thanks cib24 and tombstone. smile

cib24, you answered a lingering question I had. Thank you.

tombstone, you've not considered the sohn adaptor Dale Lomas referred to here:

http://www.pistonheads.com/news/25094.htm

You see no benefit doing in that?

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Zoin said:
Really? I had an A3 2.0TFSI quattro for 6 years and all it needed was a top up (less that a litre) between services in the first two years, after which it settled into zero oil consumption.
My sister's RX-8 was similarly frugal with oil once it was run in. I guess it's pot luck whether or not you get a good one.
I had a Civic Type R that used 1 litre every 1000 miles. The RX8's 1 litre every 2000 miles came asa relief.

ensignia

920 posts

235 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
The RX-8 could have been a great car, but the engine is fundamentally flawed. Its cons completely outweigh the pro's, and only an imbecile would believe otherwise.

justa1972

303 posts

137 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Sorry but I would not touch an RX8 with someone elses barge pole - there is a reason they are so cheap...


Speed addicted

5,575 posts

227 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
I don't have one because the cabin is a little tight and it's too close to my head above the door.

Can you lower the drivers seat any further?

LotusAlfaV6bloke

203 posts

192 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Love Mazda rotary's since my RX7 FDS3. Great cars, terrible mpg for the power, but fun fun fun.

How has no one mentioned the tax issue yet??? For such a cheap car with relatively low power, the road tax (every year) is a real show stopper frown

carinaman

21,298 posts

172 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
The road tax issue is mentioned in the article by Alisdair Suttie.

I'd only consider one registered before 23 March 2006. No way would I pay £400 a year RFL due to a registration date. Nevermind scrapping the tax disc, ditch RFL altogether and put it on fuel duty instead.

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
LotusAlfaV6bloke said:
Love Mazda rotary's since my RX7 FDS3. Great cars, terrible mpg for the power, but fun fun fun.

How has no one mentioned the tax issue yet??? For such a cheap car with relatively low power, the road tax (every year) is a real show stopper frown
To be honest the difference in tax price between a pre March 2006 RX8 of £270 vs a later RX8 of £475 is like three trips to the petrol station. An extra £205 per year for an average ownership life of 3 years is only £615. And when the car only costs £5,000-£6,500 then its not a huge issue, when a car with comparable performance...lets say a renaultsport clio 200 (I know front wheel drive but similar in speed and lap times)used with low mileage will run £11,000-£13,000. You are still saving quite a bit in comparison even if the road tax is higher.

V8 FOU

2,977 posts

147 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
I would really love an auto one of these. But there are so few of them. A lot of tw*tish dealers advertise manuals as autos - very odd.

EdM

182 posts

173 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
I'd have one of these in a bat of an eyelid if it had the MPS engine in it...

hairykrishna

13,169 posts

203 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
For me the two big issues with an RX8 are their enormous thirst for fuel and the fact that the engines go pop with alarming regularity once past ~60k miles. The two main reasons they're cheap I suspect.

No mention of either in this 'buyers guide'?

carlosbutler

150 posts

164 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
cib24 said:
First, I think one comment in particular in the article is definitely inaccurate. You DO NOT want to use the Mazda recommended 5W30 Dexylia mineral oil in this car at all. It's a horrible oil and you are better off using a proper semi-synthetic or full dino oil that is at least 10W30. Also, NEVER USE FULL SYNTHETIC OIL. That is a huge mistake.
Ah of course because what the engineers (actual engineers who designed the car, not fake 'heating/technical/bullst' engineers like this country is full of) wrote in the car manual is meaningless and there to destroy the car - my mistake, I keep forgetting to listen to smartypant-knowitall morons.

cib24 said:
Seventh, in my opinion the RX8 can be a very reliable car when properly taken car of and maintenance costs on a healthy motor will not be much more than your typical vehicle.
At least you know something of use. +1 (not being sarcastic, what you say is certainly true)


V8 FOU said:
I would really love an auto one of these. But there are so few of them. A lot of tw*tish dealers advertise manuals as autos - very odd.
You seriously don't. 9 seconds 0-100kph. They are 4-speed gearboxes I believe. If you have a manual license, avoid these AT RX-8's at all costs (also, the gear shift looks ugly).

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
I would really love an auto one of these. But there are so few of them. A lot of tw*tish dealers advertise manuals as autos - very odd.
The automatic cars are likely to have more problems with their engines than the manuals because the typical automatic RX8 purchaser was a woman who would only drive the car around at low speed and revs and never pay attention to the oil. Therefore, I would be wary of buying a used automatic RX8.

The thing with the RX8 that gets lost in arguing over their reliability is that the rotary engine is actually very reliable when maintained properly like a typical automotive enthusiast would maintain any car (with extra care). For example, it is not uncommon in the US to see rotaries last over 150k miles, but the US is a huge car culture that is very hands on with them, so the average owner puts more TLC into their car than the average UK owner. For example, a typical UK owner will have their cars serviced at the dealer according to the service manual, whereas a typical US owner will service their car much more frequently. A lot of new cars have oil change intervals which are now as much as 10k-15k miles, but a US owner will likely service the car every 3k miles out of habit.

The reason that you see so many RX8s for sale for so cheap is that they weren't properly maintained. This is Mazda's fault for marketing the car to the masses and trying to claim that it could be driven and serviced like every other car in its class. They should have sold it as an enthusiast vehicle and had a more rigorous service schedule built into the manual but they didn't. Hence, the average person buys the car because Jeremy Clarkson gives it great praise on Top Gear, drives it at low revs and on short trips to Tesco thinking it will behave like a normal piston engine, and assumes that they can forget about the oil, spark plugs, etc. For thousands of miles and it will still run just fine. The result, low compression or completely failed engines.

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
The reason you don't want to use Mazda Dexelia 5w30 is because it is an oil designed for piston engines. The rotary is much more like a 2 stroke engine in the type of oil it likes. There have been studies by rotary shops that rebuild engines and when they are taken apart, the ones using Dexelia typically show more wear. Ask a rotary specialist and they will have certain oils they recommend and none are full synthetic or dexelia.

canucklehead

416 posts

146 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
cib24 said:
First, I think one comment in particular in the article is definitely inaccurate. You DO NOT want to use the Mazda recommended 5W30 Dexylia mineral oil in this car at all. It's a horrible oil and you are better off using a proper semi-synthetic or full dino oil that is at least 10W30. Also, NEVER USE FULL SYNTHETIC OIL. That is a huge mistake. The cheap dino stuff is much better for the rotary.

Edited by cib24 on Thursday 28th March 16:29
so you know better than the guys who designed it and have been designing wankels for the better part of 40 years?

gosh you're clever.

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
canucklehead said:
so you know better than the guys who designed it and have been designing wankels for the better part of 40 years?

gosh you're clever.
I never said I knew better than the engineers. I said that based on evidence of these engines being run over time since release and them being torn down for a rebuild, that engines using dexelia exclusivley showed more signs of wear than using a motor oil recommended by someone like Ben at RotaryRevs (as an example).

Learn to comprehend sentences correctly bro.

Mazda messed up by writing a flawed service manual for the end consumer to follow.

J4CKO

41,588 posts

200 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Why didnt Mazda do a turbo version ? seems a massive opportunity as people seem to either put up with the Rx7's issues or it has less issues, I would hate to fund an RX8's engine rebuild if it was only going to be slightly brisk, I remember one having a go when I had a remapped Saab 9-3 Aero, the Saab dropped it like it was stood still, had fancied and Rx8 but it just looked slow next to a mildly fiddled with Saab, I know the RX8 would have the better chassis by some margin but it put me off.

I wish someone would do a sensibly price drive in, drive out conversion for these, how is the VW 1.8 T engined one comign on ?


Harji

2,200 posts

161 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
I've had my R3 for 3 years now, and I do not want to change it for anything else. Its simply one of the best handling cars out there.

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
canucklehead said:
so you know better than the guys who designed it and have been designing wankels for the better part of 40 years?

gosh you're clever.
You will find plenty of examples of specialists recommending different oil than the manufactures.