RE: Ford Focus ST-3 Estate: PH Fleet

RE: Ford Focus ST-3 Estate: PH Fleet

Tuesday 11th June 2013

Ford Focus ST-3 Estate: PH Fleet

Dan nicks the Focus, slings bike racks on it and starts making some very bold claims



Having commandeered the Focus I've wasted no time whatsoever in stamping my identity on it with some very 'lifestyle' modifications.

The Focus before Dan got his hands on it
The Focus before Dan got his hands on it
With a bank holiday looming speedy work by, respectively, Ford and Thule equipped me with roof bars and bike carriers. The latter I've previous experience of and are quick and easy to use, fitting painlessly to the T-track of Ford's roof bars with the supplied adaptors.

So, yes, with these and the baby seat the ST is now fully lifestyled up. My old Impreza Wagon served a very similar purpose and, indeed, was comparable in size, power and mindset to the Focus. Certainly the ST shares my old Impreza's appetite for devouring entertaining back roads that, as luck would have it, usually end in fun places to ride mountain bikes.

ST-owning PHers seem to rate the blend of pace and practicality too, former RS owner oobster saying "the main reason for going for the ST from the RS was that I have a five-year-old daughter. Before the RS I had an Octavia VRS which was fine for getting the young 'un in and out and I assumed she was old enough to get in and out of the Focus RS without too much hassle but it ended up being a ball ache. So I thought the ST would be a better proposition, five-door but with some decent grunt." The relationship with the ST didn't get off to a great start either but he seems to have been won round.

ST fits right in among swankier metal at trailhead
ST fits right in among swankier metal at trailhead
Meanwhile PHer Rythmic slapping (nice handle!) says "I have an ST3 estate in Frozen White and it is epic - cannot fault it. [It] is something that can be used every day and is not back breaking and when you want it to fly put it in third and watch the scenery go blurry."

Now, obviously at this point I have to point out that all my observations about the Focus are being made from the passenger seat. But I can report that everyone who's driven the ST has come back nodding with approval.

And the ST is such a complete car. It does all the stuff you'd ever want of any Focus estate, just at a more PHey rate of knots. I'll have to leave further driving impressions to others but two aspects of the ST's demeanour I can comment on from the passenger seat are the ride quality and noise. The latter might be artificially enhanced but there's just a hint of classic BDA/twin-cam rort. And it rides brilliantly. It's obviously very composed but I've frequently braced myself for an oncoming pothole only to feel it pass with little more than subtle tha-dunk. I have driven the ST in the past and, compared with the recently departed Megane, it's a good deal softer and less manic. More of an all-rounder but, for the above role, bang on target.

Even rubbish local roads are dealt with OK
Even rubbish local roads are dealt with OK
Alex's previous comments about the torque steerseem to be a button push away from sorting too, a couple of PHers commenting that it's a lot less manic with the stability control pegged back one notch. Something I recall from my Clio 197 in fact, whose power delivery was much smoother when not corrupted by ESP interventions.

Are we paying the price for the drag of the racks and bikes on the roof at the pumps though? Well, the last couple of tanks of mixed driving with and without bikes have seen numbers in the high 27s, which seems on a par with what others have experienced. Enjoyable as it is to rag and rev the muscular torque means there is at least the option of moderating intake via driving style that my old Impreza, or indeed a five-cylinder ST, wouldn't have offered.

Niggles? I'm hearing from the driver's seat that the appalling turning circle is a proper PITA at times. And with the baby seat behind me the bulky Recaros have my knees up against the dash, meaning his lordship will be riding behind mum in future. And the infotainment interface is a bit clunky and fussy too.

Beside that the Focus is such an all-round hit there have been 'what if...' discussions about making one a permanent addition. I'm lucky enough to be in a position to try out all sorts of cars I'd never actually considering owning in this job. But this one nails my vehicular needs so perfectly I'd be happy if it were.


FACT SHEET
Car:
 Ford Focus ST-3 Estate
Run by:Alex, and Dan (by proxy)
On fleet since: April 2013
Mileage: 10,133
List price new: £29,055 (Basic list of £26,595 plus £750 for Sony DAB Navigation System with Rear View Camera, £900 for Driver Assistance Pack, £200 for privacy glass, £85 for door edge protectors, £525 for Spirit Blue Metallic paint)
Last month at a glance: Focus proves its versatility, living the lifestyle, er, lifestyle


Previous reports:
Fords estate/hot hatch Focus joins the fleet
The Focus goes up in Alex's estimations





   

[Photos: Dan/Prime Exposures]

Author
Discussion

wab172uk

Original Poster:

2,005 posts

228 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
That interior looks plain awful.

At least the estate looks far better than the hatch back

TrickyTrevM5

297 posts

187 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Not that I would (natch) but on which part of the central exhaust are you supposed to attach a tow-bar....?

r7ehw

127 posts

238 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
TrickyTrevM5 said:
Not that I would (natch) but on which part of the central exhaust are you supposed to attach a tow-bar....?
I came on to post the same thing. I use my estate car for lugging bikes around too but far prefer my rear mounted tow bar 4 bike unit by thule and its fantastic but the sexy exhaust pipes may work on a coupe but surely they could leave it out on a "practical estate".

And for that reason I'm out.

V8 FOU

2,977 posts

148 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Driver assistance pack?? WTF??

dapearson

4,355 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
r7ehw said:
I came on to post the same thing. I use my estate car for lugging bikes around too but far prefer my rear mounted tow bar 4 bike unit by thule and its fantastic but the sexy exhaust pipes may work on a coupe but surely they could leave it out on a "practical estate".

And for that reason I'm out.
I was getting a bit excited until i saw those exhaust pipes. What a PITA!

Why do manufacturers keep making performance estate cars and then not getting them type approved for towing!?

e.g.
Audi S4 4.2 V8 estate - not rated for towing.
Audi S5 4.2 V8 coupe - rated for towing.

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
dapearson said:
Why do manufacturers keep making performance estate cars and then not getting them type approved for towing!?
Because 90% of people will never want to tow with them but like shiny central exhausts, I suppose. If you want a fastish estate which is capable of towing, there are some decent options out there.

dapearson

4,355 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
Because 90% of people will never want to tow with them but like shiny central exhausts, I suppose.
Well, yes, thanks for that.

rolleyes

Konan

1,842 posts

147 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Interesting comment on fuel economy relative to the Impreza. You're recording 3mpg less from that ST than my Chavwagon manages.

What spec was the old Subaru? I'm wondering if it was stock. I did see a 3mpg rise between my standard one and having a Prodrive engine pack. As you say, having more torque does allow less aggressive use of the throttle day-to-day (along with the 3rd cat being lopped out of the exhaust).

Of course, I don't have a Subaru to brag about MPG.... but I wouldn't be able to use it every day if wasn't moderately sensible. Isn't 27 a loooong way off the ST claimed?

dapearson

4,355 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Konan said:
Isn't 27 a loooong way off the ST claimed?
It's a Ford, so that's to be expected.

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
dapearson said:
kambites said:
Because 90% of people will never want to tow with them but like shiny central exhausts, I suppose.
Well, yes, thanks for that.

rolleyes
You asked the question, I gave you the answer. hehe

They're giving their customers what they want.

Konan

1,842 posts

147 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
dapearson said:
It's a Ford, so that's to be expected.
The kind of Fords I like are at least 20 years old now! Who knows what fuel economy I used to get from the Sierras, the fuel gauge was less accurate than a Microsoft progress bar.

bencollins

3,530 posts

206 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all

Gives me a swollen prostrate just looking at that saddle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMYZyUygW6Y

Antj

1,049 posts

201 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
blimey 27mpg. Is it me are all these MPG claims ( ford claim 39.2mph on combined) a load of old tosh. That figure is genuinely worse than my 130i.

Krikkit

26,544 posts

182 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
dapearson said:
It's a Ford modern, turbocharged car subjected to NEDC tests, so that's to be expected.
FTFY. smile

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
dapearson said:
It's a Ford modern, turbocharged car subjected to NEDC tests, so that's to be expected.
FTFY. smile
yes It seems that it's very much easier to tailor turbocharged engines to the test than normally aspirated ones.

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
(Almost) £30K for a Focus ???? Jeez ... eek

dapearson

4,355 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
yes It seems that it's very much easier to tailor turbocharged engines to the test than normally aspirated ones.
Wife's Cooper-S 1.6 turbo is bang-on the claims made by MINI. Hits early 40s mpg no problem.

My 2002 impreza wrx was bang-on the claims made by Subaru. My wife got 34mpg out of it on one tank to my amazement.

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
dapearson said:
kambites said:
yes It seems that it's very much easier to tailor turbocharged engines to the test than normally aspirated ones.
Wife's Cooper-S 1.6 turbo is bang-on the claims made by MINI. Hits early 40s mpg no problem.

My 2002 impreza wrx was bang-on the claims made by Subaru. My wife got 34mpg out of it on one tank to my amazement.
That's nice, but I'm not sure what it has to do with the point. I don't think anyone is claiming that all turbos are tuned to the test to that degree. Just that if manufacturers really want to get a low CO2 figure at the expense of all else, it's easier to achieve with a turbocharged engine.

ETA: It's quite interesting that the MINI is good though, because BMWs tend to be amongst the worst offenders in my experience; or at least were the first manufacturer to really put the effort in.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 11th June 14:35

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

219 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Looks like an upset Carp at the front and a Galaxy from the rear - why?

dapearson

4,355 posts

225 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
ETA: It's quite interesting that the MINI is good though, because BMWs tend to be amongst the worst offenders in my experience; or at least were the first manufacturer to really put the effort in.
Such a shame that it has a thirst for oil like a 2 stroke...