RE: Mercedes A45 AMG: Review

RE: Mercedes A45 AMG: Review

Author
Discussion

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

179 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
bertie said:
pilchardthecat said:
I doubt the engine is better on the 135 by my criteria - it's all midrange and disappointing at the top end. The merc is said to have a nice kick up top.
Well from my comparison which was A250 (gruff, felt like any other 4 banger) compared to M135i (silky smooth, nice and woofly with a great cultured wail at the top end) there was no comparison.

I can't imagine any car that isn't better with more cylinders, but each to their own.
I used to think like that, but the horrible engine in the original 135i changed my opinion. The more "cylinders is always better" applies only to normally aspirated engines. Nowadays BMW can make a 6 pot turbo drive like a big diesel with a slightly better soundtrack.

Schnellmann

1,893 posts

204 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
bertie said:
pilchardthecat said:
I doubt the engine is better on the 135 by my criteria - it's all midrange and disappointing at the top end. The merc is said to have a nice kick up top.
Well from my comparison which was A250 (gruff, felt like any other 4 banger) compared to M135i (silky smooth, nice and woofly with a great cultured wail at the top end) there was no comparison.

I can't imagine any car that isn't better with more cylinders, but each to their own.
+1

I have driven both M135i and the A45 and very different. The A45 is great on a country road if you are on a mission. But it didn't sound nice to my ears and suffered from turbo lag when you are not going for it. 90% of the time the BMW 6-cylinder engine much more cultivated with much more low down urge. Having an extra litre of capacity as well as two extra cylinders makes a huge difference to how it drives on a daily basis.

If you prefer the type of delivery provided by the Merc then that is fine. Just not for me (for the use my M135i will get).

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
pilchardthecat said:
bertie said:
pilchardthecat said:
I doubt the engine is better on the 135 by my criteria - it's all midrange and disappointing at the top end. The merc is said to have a nice kick up top.
Well from my comparison which was A250 (gruff, felt like any other 4 banger) compared to M135i (silky smooth, nice and woofly with a great cultured wail at the top end) there was no comparison.

I can't imagine any car that isn't better with more cylinders, but each to their own.
I used to think like that, but the horrible engine in the original 135i changed my opinion. The more "cylinders is always better" applies only to normally aspirated engines. Nowadays BMW can make a 6 pot turbo drive like a big diesel with a slightly better soundtrack.
Well I came out of an E92 M3 V8, that is an awesome engine IMHO, and the M135i isn't far behind.

I've yet to drive a very charismatic or cultured 4 pot, and I include the one in my Caterham R400, fine for that sort of car, but I wouldn't want to drive it everyday.

Lowtimer

Original Poster:

4,286 posts

168 months

Monday 15th July 2013
quotequote all
bertie said:
I've yet to drive a very charismatic or cultured 4 pot
Never driven a car fitted with a healthy BDA derivative, Alfa or Fiat twin-cam, Alfa flat-four or Lotus 1.6 or 2.2?

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Tuesday 16th July 2013
quotequote all
We sat in an A45 AMG at Goodwood. My 9 year old broke the cupholder without even trying. I then cut my finger on the sharp plastics trying to 'fix it' before anybody noticed.
I've not driven it so it may well be great fun but the interior felt pretty shoddy - especially for £40k. Nice seats though.

astirling

419 posts

172 months

Friday 26th July 2013
quotequote all
Durzel said:
I agree, and I personally wouldn't spend £37k (£40k+ when optioned sensibly) on this car, no disrespect to those that would.
But most people won't spend £40k on it. They'll lease it for £10k over two years, with no other costs but fuel.

Someone will say to me - 'but you'll have nothing that belongs to you at the end of the lease term'. So what? You buy your used car for £40k cash, sell it after the same 2 year period for £30k, and you will also have paid more for a warranty, servicing, anything that goes wrong...so they financial pain is very similar.

I agree that the A45 is pricey, but I don't think it matters as much as many on here think.

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Friday 26th July 2013
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
bertie said:
I've yet to drive a very charismatic or cultured 4 pot
Never driven a car fitted with a healthy BDA derivative, Alfa or Fiat twin-cam, Alfa flat-four or Lotus 1.6 or 2.2?
Yes, an Esprit, but it was not great and that's why Lotus put a V8 in it.

More recently, my Caterham R400 suits an angry 4 banger too.

But in an everyday car, I'd take a 6 cylinder every time.

Kronstein

294 posts

129 months

Friday 26th July 2013
quotequote all
Autocar reviewed (although not much detail) the Quaife diff on the M135i this week - looks like a good option to consider.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
two thoughts...

26pi boost? is that turbo-lag I hear?
Haldex - oh great, another FWD bodge...

Kronstein

294 posts

129 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
two thoughts...

26pi boost? is that turbo-lag I hear?
Haldex - oh great, another FWD bodge...
Reviews (by people who race/do plenty of track time) seem positive though no?

Not trying to be argumentative but turbo lag on a 10.x to 100 machine doesn't seem like a big problem. scratchchin

kambites

67,578 posts

221 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
As far as I can see, turbo lag has no effect on outright performance with an automatic gearbox (and would have to be pretty damned shocking to have much effect on a manual).

From what I've read, I doubt the turbo lag will be any better or worse than its competitors. I certainly haven't read any comments that it's exceptional in that regard either way.

Kronstein

294 posts

129 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Sure: point I was trying to make was that it has enough performance to carry any lag although as you say,that hasn't been pointed out in any of the tests so far.

I'm looking forward to a demo - sounds like it covers quite a few bases/offers lots of performance and is fun/slightly different.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
kid of missing the point though...

off boost is going to be very lethargic, the compression ratio to stand 26psi is going to have to be pretty low (and remember here we are talking 95Ron fuel to get it homologated).

then think just how fast the turbo can build 0 to 26psi, it's going be noticeable.

yes, 0-100 times are going to look good, however, with a dsg gearbox, it's going to be on boost from the off, so not really a good test, driving it about on part throttle etc Will be though.

The Vambo

6,643 posts

141 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
two thoughts...

26pi boost? is that turbo-lag I hear?
Haldex - oh great, another FWD bodge...
Erudite, insightful and wonderfully original.

That post is none of these.

kambites

67,578 posts

221 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
True, but the fact still remains that none of the reviews have commented particularly unfavourably on the throttle response. What type of turbocharger setup is it?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
The Vambo said:
Erudite, insightful and wonderfully original.

That post is none of these.
much like your considered response then!


kambites said:
True, but the fact still remains that none of the reviews have commented particularly unfavourably on the throttle response. What type of turbocharger setup is it?
good question?

there's almost no info out there on this engine install, i guess utterly could be compound turbo'ed or the like? but that's still going to have response issues..

kambites

67,578 posts

221 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Any turbocharged setup on a rod car is going to have response issues to some degree or other. The question is how much.

Dave Hedgehog

14,563 posts

204 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
two thoughts...

26pi boost? is that turbo-lag I hear?
Haldex - oh great, another FWD bodge...
i didn't notice any lag in the one i have driven, i expected it to be pretty bad in heavy traffic but in auto the box just changes down a few cogs to put you in the power, it certainly is more flexible in traffic than a B8 RS4

haldex 4 onwards will split power 50/50 on throttle use (there are dyno traces showing this), its a vastly different animal to the original version and there is always power to both axels, when you have 50/50 power split on the limit of traction steering will apply additional force to the front axel which will cause the car to ultimately understeer. I will say the A45 is vastly better nailed down on the front than any other haldex car i have ever driven. And dont forget haldex is good enough for Bugatti wink

the A45 just felt slow to me, for a car that's supposed to be faster than an 135i i expected it to have a real bang when going for it and be a snarly beast, rather its just a wave of power rather than an explosion, felt like a slightly quicker R golf imo

kambites

67,578 posts

221 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
I wonder why 50/50? If you're going to go to the effort of powering the rear wheels all the time (with the associated drive-line losses that that gives) I'd have thought that you'd want no more than 50% to the front and a "typical" distribution of something like 30/70 F/R.

Out of interest, why would you consider heavy traffic to be bad for turbo lag? In my experience it makes itself most obvious transitioning onto the throttle coming out of fast corners.

Dave Hedgehog

14,563 posts

204 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
Any turbocharged setup on a rod car is going to have response issues to some degree or other. The question is how much.
twin scroll turbos have made a huge difference to pick up response in turbo's the A45 produces peak torque from 2250 revs which is not to high