RE: Chris Harris video: RS6 vs CLS63

RE: Chris Harris video: RS6 vs CLS63

Author
Discussion

tomoleeds

770 posts

187 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
AFC1886 said:
Could you possibly make a video that doesn't include a German car?

That would be nice, thanks!
And one with the volume loud enough for a laptop
every other site volume fine ,PH cant hear it ,I give up, how hard can it be

gavm5

186 posts

207 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
Would the CLS63AMGshootingbrakelabrourdoodlestate been quicker if it was not leaking fluid from the top on the coolant tank been fitted correctly ?
Who on earth preps these cars ?

Wills2

22,878 posts

176 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
CliveM said:
Surely both of these have gone miles past the point where the law of diminishing returns makes them the choice of the genitally challenged or those who just buy "the most expensive" of a range without a second thought?

They're big enough to be unwieldy on UK roads, able to post great performance figures having made compromises on other areas that don't make sense to most.
It's hugely impressive that you can get a 2 tonne estate to do that - I just find it really odd that there are enough people willing to drop £60k in 3 years for the pleasure. Ah well, maybe I'm just jealous of those that can. Honestly don't know, as I have a nigh-on 2 tonne "sports" car that struggles to better 20mpg (it's old though so depreciation is less of an issue).
What's not to like about these cars? Large capable machines that can seat 5 people and carry their luggage that are beautifully finished/equipped and provide a great turn of speed?

What better way to cruise the villa/ski chalet with the family, granted at 80-90k you have to be wealthy but I would if I could.

I think either would be a good partner for a sports car in a nice 2 car garage.

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
Hope BMW make an M5 Estate (F11), doubt it though, the last one didn't exactly fly out the showroom.
Shame though, it looks pretty awesome, IMO. A million times better looking the CLS.



P1H

418 posts

149 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
chelme said:
Good Point. CH whats your response?

Also why are we celebrating these? Like anyone is going to do a 0-60 sprint at the traffic lights in a built up area with 30 mph limits, or do a stop start on a national speed limit road. How moronic is that?

I can see the strange logic in owning a sports/supercar, its about the design of it, the sound of the engine, the lightness/agility of the car, the communication from the controls. These just seem like hugely fast barges. Where is the fun in driving these?

Seriously, these are nothing but statistics and bragging rights. We are no longer at school kids, or perhaps some of you are.
Just no.

Carnnoisseur

531 posts

155 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Not in the market for either, but nevertheless enjoyed the video. In an ideal world it would be a combination of the Audi performance and exterior coupled with the CLS interior.

Walter Sobchak

5,723 posts

225 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Wouldn't a more fair comparison be with a new E63 AMG S, but the 4wd version, on paper it's quicker than the RS6, both epic cars though couldn't go wrong with either, although I'm not keen on the CLS Shooting brake, would prefer the normal one, or an E Class.

chandrew

979 posts

210 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
The one that wasn't in this but probably should have been is the Alpina B5 Biturbo Toruing. Same ZF 8 speed as the Audi (though Alpina reckon that it's super fast with trick cylinder deactivation on shifts), far more exclusive than either of these and my guess a bit cheaper (or spend the same and get every surface trimmed in leather). I think Alpina's more compliant suspension suits fast estate cars well.


Spoof

1,854 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
hdrflow said:
Audi for me. What's with the 'is built by Audi RS' references though? Quattro Gmbh builds them.
They don't build all the RS models now though.

Spoof

1,854 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
P1H said:
chelme said:
Good Point. CH whats your response?

Also why are we celebrating these? Like anyone is going to do a 0-60 sprint at the traffic lights in a built up area with 30 mph limits, or do a stop start on a national speed limit road. How moronic is that?

I can see the strange logic in owning a sports/supercar, its about the design of it, the sound of the engine, the lightness/agility of the car, the communication from the controls. These just seem like hugely fast barges. Where is the fun in driving these?

Seriously, these are nothing but statistics and bragging rights. We are no longer at school kids, or perhaps some of you are.
Just no.
Seriously?

I'll just leave this here for you: http://www.mumsnet.com/

chelme

1,353 posts

171 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
CliveM said:
Surely both of these have gone miles past the point where the law of diminishing returns makes them the choice of the genitally challenged or those who just buy "the most expensive" of a range without a second thought?

They're big enough to be unwieldy on UK roads, able to post great performance figures having made compromises on other areas that don't make sense to most.
It's hugely impressive that you can get a 2 tonne estate to do that - I just find it really odd that there are enough people willing to drop £60k in 3 years for the pleasure.
+1 There is nothing in these cars for me. £90k+?? What a load of willywagging bks. Get an ordinary estate for £30k to do your load lugging if you wish, spend the rest on a proper sports car.

deltashad

6,731 posts

198 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
chelme said:
CliveM said:
Surely both of these have gone miles past the point where the law of diminishing returns makes them the choice of the genitally challenged or those who just buy "the most expensive" of a range without a second thought?

They're big enough to be unwieldy on UK roads, able to post great performance figures having made compromises on other areas that don't make sense to most.
It's hugely impressive that you can get a 2 tonne estate to do that - I just find it really odd that there are enough people willing to drop £60k in 3 years for the pleasure.
+1 There is nothing in these cars for me. £90k+?? What a load of willywagging bks. Get an ordinary estate for £30k to do your load lugging if you wish, spend the rest on a proper sports car.
You guys are totally right, i'd much rather drive a 2.0 td A6 around as an everyday.
Wasting all that petrol, making a racket everywhere with an engine that sounds like an old spitfire jet surrounded in absolute luxury.

Doesn't appeal to me at all .................... ??

deltashad

6,731 posts

198 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
On a more serious note, I wouldn't go for either, if I had no option and had to choose, the Audi would win, I have a Merc and know how crap they are in the snow.
These cars should be driven to the Alps in the winter and I think as much as I prefer the Merc, it would get stuck.

Give me a used G63 in mafia black instead please.


Kronstein

294 posts

130 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Enjoyable video. I'd take the Merc but I'm sure a C63 would suffice.

What would be interesting in these sorts of tests is watching 5 people get into the car/feedback from the rear passengers and loading them up with some luggage. The same target load could be applied to other classes (Golf 7/C63/E63/A45AMG/Cayenne...) which would make for an interesting comparison test - performance stats loaded/unloaded/with load and rear comfort feedback.. I know PH isn't WhatCar but no-one seems to do these tests and surely that's a key driver behind these models.

German

203 posts

148 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
405dogvan said:
AFC1886 said:
Could you possibly make a video that doesn't include a German car?

That would be nice, thanks!
Racism is so rife around here isn't it! smile
Ve are Vatching vith interest...

Veeayt

3,139 posts

206 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Where's the beard? confused

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

283 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Come on Audi, we all know the RS6 has quattro... no need to plaster it all over the front of the car. Just plain hideous.

Nice/fast as they may be to drive, neither floats my boat...


Bencolem

1,019 posts

240 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
chandrew said:
The one that wasn't in this but probably should have been is the Alpina B5 Biturbo Toruing. Same ZF 8 speed as the Audi (though Alpina reckon that it's super fast with trick cylinder deactivation on shifts), far more exclusive than either of these and my guess a bit cheaper (or spend the same and get every surface trimmed in leather). I think Alpina's more compliant suspension suits fast estate cars well.
My thoughts exactly. B5 Touring should be in this video!

Harris's enthusiasm is as infectious as ever - but I'm confused about the RS6 ride; Autocar slated the steel sprung dynamic option for being far too harsh even in comfort mode?

Small Car

877 posts

200 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Nice run up Monmouth High Street in the vid. Close it off and turn it in to a drag strip. Happy days.


simo1863

1,868 posts

129 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Bencolem said:
My thoughts exactly. B5 Touring should be in this video!

Harris's enthusiasm is as infectious as ever - but I'm confused about the RS6 ride; Autocar slated the steel sprung dynamic option for being far too harsh even in comfort mode?
I agree, I've driven every current RS and every single one has had suspension so hard I don't think I could like with it.

If it was me I'd do what is mentioned above and opt for a C63 Coupe PP, if I had kids and stuff then maybe the Estate.

Can understand the snow point but I'm semi-rural, near some major roads and it isn't much of an issue.