RE: Jaguar C-X17 full details

RE: Jaguar C-X17 full details

Author
Discussion

renorti

727 posts

197 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
can't wait, in 3 or 4 years be able to buy one for under 10k.

Bill Carr

2,234 posts

235 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
I like it a lot, but then I'm a - whisper it - liker of SUVs in general.

I hope it manages the Jag comfort / performance equation well.

wildcat45

8,076 posts

190 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
john_r said:
Glad it's not just me then... slightly squarer 'BMW' front with a Jag grill and a bigger roof lip spoiler on a Mazda CX-7.

I could not replace my 2.3 petrol CX-7 when I came to change. They had stopped building it. I now have a very nice but slow Freelander SD4. I wish they'd been selling this Jag back at Christmas. It would suit my needs and wants perfectly.

How much of this is based on Land Rover technology?

(The CX-7 is still in the family, just not mine any more. I miss it.)

The Vambo

6,643 posts

142 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
How much of this is based on Land Rover technology?
None really, this seems the first use of a joint JLR platform.

Jobbo

12,973 posts

265 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Can anyone photoshop what the small Jag SUV, no doubt to be called a C-X15, will be like based on this:


don logan

3,521 posts

223 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
I thought I saw this the other day, couldn't imagine what else it could be now that the RR Sport is out etc


As you can see it was accompanied by a full size RR which was LHD on UK plates

PunterCam

1,073 posts

196 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Ah yes, isn't it funny how most SUV concepts look great? It's because that photo could be of a mini clubman sized car. What are these wheels? 22"? Imagine it with small 18" wheels and smaller wheel arches and you get close to what the actual car might be.

Handsome enough if it looked like this, but it could be so much better - DAKAR RALLY CARS PEOPLE!! Big wheel arches on the XF, then raise it 12" and fit big tyres. Or do a LM002! Please someone!

RacerMike

4,211 posts

212 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
don logan said:
I thought I saw this the other day, couldn't imagine what else it could be now that the RR Sport is out etc


As you can see it was accompanied by a full size RR which was LHD on UK plates
Sorry to disappoint, but that's just one of the remaining camo'd 'Sports

don logan

3,521 posts

223 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
don logan said:
I thought I saw this the other day, couldn't imagine what else it could be now that the RR Sport is out etc


As you can see it was accompanied by a full size RR which was LHD on UK plates
Sorry to disappoint, but that's just one of the remaining camo'd 'Sports
Not disappointed, just couldn't see why a Sport would still be running around in camo, this was August 29th-ish!

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
How come not much negativity about this but when the likes of BMW & Audi introduced the X4, Q5 etc there's people saying stuff like they've 'diluted the brand', 'they've lost it' etc?

NGK210

2,959 posts

146 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Hated SUVs, 'til I drove an X5 paperbag

Its airy cabin was relaxing and comfortable, the raised seat height/eye line was useful for seeing ahead in town traffic and over hedges, etc, on B-roads. And, dare I say it, I also liked its sense of security.

Its handling was a revelation and the AWD useful in snow/rain/floods or for softcore off-roading - eg, crossing a wet Glasto' field - and its inability to match a Rangie or Disco off-road was inconsequential, as I'm not a farmer or a huntin'/shootin'/fishin' type.

But I'm also not an urban coke dealer/pimp-type and I dislike the X5's 'get out of my way little man!' vibe, which Jag seems to have neatly side-stepped.

Canny Jag, very canny clap




Edited by NGK210 on Monday 9th September 23:13

ESOG

1,705 posts

159 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Ugh, enough with the SUV's already!!! STICK TO MAKING CARS AND SPORTS CARS!!!!! LEAVE THE SUVS TO other marques!

leonkehoe

12 posts

163 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
It's not quite there for me, styling wise. I appreciate it's an SUV but it needs a little more aggression in my opinion, a few sharper angles and body lines. Good effort though.

AndrewSV

118 posts

150 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
Now that is an SUV I like, no wait, love! There's nothing about that design I don't like, well done Jaguar smile

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24018350
Looks like a Volvo to me
Is it using Lotus Versatile Vehicle Architecure chassis concept?

At least car manufacturing is moving forward given decent management


jamieduff1981

8,025 posts

141 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
I don't mind it to be honest, but I still can't see the point in it from a buyer's point of view.

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong but I have hobbies that involve fairly big stuff, buy a lot of big stuff and have a wife and 2 children yet have never felt hampered on the practicality front by owning 2 saloons and sports cars. I just don't appreciate the advantage that "practicality" brings. I can see that this is bigger inside than mine is, of course, but the extra space isn't anywhere I could put something in. I suppose if I had a really big hat it would be handy, but I just don't see the point.

I don't find SUV proportions attractive in any way. I could see myself buying a beat-up V8 RR or Disco with chunky tyres for proper winter use and I've been meaning to do so but have always managed just fine up in Scotland with RWD and a crap AWD car. I just don't need a 4x4. When I move to the country next year and my road doesn't get plowed, it's an old RR or Disco I'll need with chunky tyres and not a cross-over SUV which will get just as stuck as my current cars would.

As far as fat-bird proportions go, the CX-17 is about as nice a job as anyone could expect, but as an individual I still can't see me actually handing over money for this because I honestly, genuinely cannot see what benefit this brings that I don't get from my current car shaped cars.

If you like chunky tonka toys then fine, but I still don't get it.

Redlake27

2,255 posts

245 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
don logan said:
I thought I saw this the other day, couldn't imagine what else it could be now that the RR Sport is out etc


As you can see it was accompanied by a full size RR which was LHD on UK plates
Sorry to disappoint, but that's just one of the remaining camo'd 'Sports
I think that is a new model. The Range Rover Sport XL. Filling a niche between RRS and RR. Yes, another niche!

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
I wonder where the aluminium is coming from?

framerateuk

2,733 posts

185 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
I can't say I like it - I'm just not a fan of SUVs. I do however see why Jag need to make it, and so long as they keep making their other cars I have no complaints smile.

zebedee

4,589 posts

279 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
A Scotsman said:
I wonder where the aluminium is coming from?
why do you wonder that?