RE: BMW M135i vs Renaultsport Megane 265

RE: BMW M135i vs Renaultsport Megane 265

Author
Discussion

Phil Dicky

7,162 posts

264 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
gaz1234 said:
no one has mentioned differences regards stealing ability...?
Which would totally discount the BM, and also the Audi competition smile

FamilyDub

3,587 posts

166 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
CraigV6 said:
(M135i)...really awfully designed car. Very difficult to tell it apart from the rest of the range too.
^^ That's kind of the idea. Discreet, if rather ugly, performance. Mr Jones down the road in his 116d won't be able to tell it's not the same spec car as his, especially with that little ///M badge peeled off.

CraigV6 said:
...is disappointing for a "flagship"!
^^ Really the 1M coupe was the previous gen "flagship". The M135i sits in a new 'M-Performance' sub-brand, i.e. it's not a 'full fat M-car'.

Yes, 'M' engineers have been involved, but it's *not* a bona fide 'M'. Perhaps BMW have left room in the model cycle for another 1M to perhaps be nearer the £40k/A45 AMG territory and sit above the M135i?

Wolands Advocate said:
Well, yes, that's kind of half the appeal. Q cars are much classier than shouty-looking be-winged versions of otherwise non-sporty designs. Unless you are a teenager.
^^ Indeed.

daveknott5

731 posts

220 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Well a few months ago PH compared the Megane with the BRZ and the BRZ won. So by that logic, the GT86 must be more fun than both the Megane 265 and the M135i.........

http://www.pistonheads.com/roadtests/doc.asp?c=47&...


Edited by daveknott5 on Wednesday 18th September 13:23

zebra

4,555 posts

215 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
jerrytlr said:
I actually quite like the look of the 1 series ............
Well I thought I was alone ! I got insulted here for daring to like it !
The looks swayed me to buying one. Happy to be different.

Dblue

3,252 posts

201 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
daveknott5 said:
Well a few months ago PH compared the Megane with the BRZ and the BRZ won. So by that logic, the GT86 must be more fun than both the Megane 265 and the M135i.........

http://www.pistonheads.com/roadtests/doc.asp?c=47&...


Edited by daveknott5 on Wednesday 18th September 13:23
Absolutely. Not saying otherwise but its a fair bit further away from the usability of the BMW. Also I've seen a few comparisons between the 2 suggesting quite the opposite.

daveknott5

731 posts

220 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Dblue said:
Absolutely. Not saying otherwise but its a fair bit further away from the usability of the BMW. Also I've seen a few comparisons between the 2 suggesting quite the opposite.
Agreed, EVO seemed to think the Megane absolutely destroys the GT86/BRZ for fun and adrenaline....

VeeFource

1,076 posts

178 months

Thursday 19th September 2013
quotequote all
Roma101 said:
toppstuff said:
Seriously, when was the last time you saw a Renault 11 or even a 19? The 19 isn't that old.

Come to that, even first generation Meganes are disappearing from our roads.

Clios and Lagunas too - all being scrapped at a rapid rate.

In contrast, you still see plenty of old 3 series BMWs knocking around. I don't for a moment believe things have suddenly changed and the French are suddenly making cars with deep down build quality. And there is no evidence in the modern reliability surveys to suggest things are changing either.

In short. This shiny Megane will be a shed not long after the finance payments are finished.
I'm not talking about their older cars. I'm talking about their recent cars - i.e. the last decade or so, of which I have a lot of experience. My point is that even in the last decade or so the quality of the cars has improved a lot and now it is very good. A number of people above have put counter arguments to your other points above, so I will just ask why you don't think Renault would have improved the quality of their cars in the last 15 or so years? I find that baffling. Improvement in technology, knowledge, materials, methods and also the need to. If they had not made that effort, they would have folded ages ago. Don't forget their relationship with Nissan. I am sure there would have been/is a lot of knowledge and process sharing there, which perhaps partly explains the improvement.

Seriously, PH, can we stop this silly anti-French rubbish once and for all.
Renault do seem to have improved according to the What Car reliability index above. But I can't help but think back to the moment when I discovered why my 350Z's boot kept filling up with water; it was the cabin air vents which had big Renault logos on them! Made my own seals and problem sorted.. did make me chortle though