RE: Caterham AeroSeven Concept
Discussion
AA121 said:
ewenm said:
Chapppers said:
That is really, really, really fking awful. I figuratively flushed something better looking not 45mins ago.
Do you think it looks worse than the BAC MonoIt will distract us all from the circus freakshow entrant you've built.
MX7 said:
kambites said:
Also, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't there a maximum height for step-over sides for type approval? If there is, there's no way that meets them.
Even for low volume?Skater12 said:
davo23 said:
That does actually improve it a lot !Though fire would also have the same effect.
ewenm said:
AA121 said:
ewenm said:
Chapppers said:
That is really, really, really fking awful. I figuratively flushed something better looking not 45mins ago.
Do you think it looks worse than the BAC MonoEdited by AA121 on Friday 20th September 16:18
Dear god. There's not a single angle that looks right from. Its an unmitigated mess.
I wonder why a company like Caterham without any in house designers or budget doesn't just run a competition for industrial design students to design something like this, with the top designs given exposure and the best chosen by a poll of their customers and marque enthusiasts. If its good enough for Ferrari...
I wonder why a company like Caterham without any in house designers or budget doesn't just run a competition for industrial design students to design something like this, with the top designs given exposure and the best chosen by a poll of their customers and marque enthusiasts. If its good enough for Ferrari...
Stew2000 said:
The biggest problem is that the images are on a solid white background. It needs to be taken to tracks with other cars so we can judge the proportions properly.
No the biggest problem is it looks fvcking stupid and the fewer people who see it the better. Frankly its embarrasing. I can't believe Caterham thought it was a good idea to release these imagesGassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff