RE: Mitsubishi Evo X FQ 330 SST: Spotted

RE: Mitsubishi Evo X FQ 330 SST: Spotted

Author
Discussion

Guvernator

13,167 posts

166 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
RINGMEISTER said:
The trouble with these later Evos and Imprezas was that they were trying to be all things to all men, instead of sticking to what they knew best. I still think the Evo 6 TME and Impreza P1 are their respective pinnacles.
^^^^ Spot on, still to be bested. Everything released since by either got progressively worse IMO. Instead of trying to compete with the Germans on better interior plastics and failing, they should have stuck to what made them uniquely desirable in the first place. Bang for buck, raw performance and relatively light weight. Not everyone wants 16 way adjustable electric seats and a "performance car" which weighs 2 tonnes.

All they needed to do was improve their mpg\co2 emissions and keep them relatively affordable compared to their German rivals to still be relevant in todays market.

jamespink

1,218 posts

205 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Monaro5.7 said:
B5NXJ said:
26.2 mpg?laugh
What i would give for 26.2mpg hehe
Just what I was thinking!

Harryturbs

46 posts

128 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
bobberz said:
My one major issue I have with Evos is I haven't heard a single one that sounds good. They just sound like overgrown, lower-revving, sport bike engines and are usually equipped with those Folger's Coffee fart cans, which makes them sound even worse.

By comparison, the Subarus have a lovely sound, almost like a V8 at times.

So, I don't think I could have either since it's a choice of good looks and crap sound, or lovely sound and crap looks.
You can't have heard one running decent boost with a decent exhaust giving it some stick then! My 370hp Evo VI with magnex exhaust 3" turbo back sounded awesome. Personal taste though I guess...



don logan

3,523 posts

223 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Harryturbs said:
bobberz said:
My one major issue I have with Evos is I haven't heard a single one that sounds good. They just sound like overgrown, lower-revving, sport bike engines and are usually equipped with those Folger's Coffee fart cans, which makes them sound even worse.

By comparison, the Subarus have a lovely sound, almost like a V8 at times.

So, I don't think I could have either since it's a choice of good looks and crap sound, or lovely sound and crap looks.
You can't have heard one running decent boost with a decent exhaust giving it some stick then! My 370hp Evo VI with magnex exhaust 3" turbo back sounded awesome. Personal taste though I guess...
I have 450 with an HKS Silent Power and no CAT and I still think it sounds st, before that I had a Mongoose exhaust which sounded st, before that I had the Hayward & Scott exhaust which also sounded st!

Last year I had an Impreza GB270 Wagon for a while with some no name exhaust and the sound gave me the HORN!


Ocellia

188 posts

150 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
I taught myself Left Foot braking after reading about it in a Setright article.
Makes perfect sense to me; no micro-second gap whilst moving right foot over, etc!

But I'm not sure I could cope with the lack of suspension on this car!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Harryturbs said:
bobberz said:
My one major issue I have with Evos is I haven't heard a single one that sounds good. They just sound like overgrown, lower-revving, sport bike engines and are usually equipped with those Folger's Coffee fart cans, which makes them sound even worse.

By comparison, the Subarus have a lovely sound, almost like a V8 at times.

So, I don't think I could have either since it's a choice of good looks and crap sound, or lovely sound and crap looks.
You can't have heard one running decent boost with a decent exhaust giving it some stick then! My 370hp Evo VI with magnex exhaust 3" turbo back sounded awesome. Personal taste though I guess...
Afraid I'd have to agree with bobberz on this one. Sure you can make an Evo loud, or even loud and obnoxious, but they all still sound like exactly what they are - which is a 4 pot inline. Not saying they sound horrid or anything like that, just they never sound any better than anything else ordinary like a barried up Civic or Fiesta. And certainly not of the ilk of truly great sounding cars.

In this regard the Impreza always had the Evo licked sounding almost V8 like with it's rumble.

richard300

1,085 posts

210 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
don logan said:
Harryturbs said:
bobberz said:
My one major issue I have with Evos is I haven't heard a single one that sounds good. They just sound like overgrown, lower-revving, sport bike engines and are usually equipped with those Folger's Coffee fart cans, which makes them sound even worse.

By comparison, the Subarus have a lovely sound, almost like a V8 at times.

So, I don't think I could have either since it's a choice of good looks and crap sound, or lovely sound and crap looks.
You can't have heard one running decent boost with a decent exhaust giving it some stick then! My 370hp Evo VI with magnex exhaust 3" turbo back sounded awesome. Personal taste though I guess...
I have 450 with an HKS Silent Power and no CAT and I still think it sounds st, before that I had a Mongoose exhaust which sounded st, before that I had the Hayward & Scott exhaust which also sounded st!

Last year I had an Impreza GB270 Wagon for a while with some no name exhaust and the sound gave me the HORN!
I had a Blitz NUR 'Spec R' full system with Cat removed and i really liked the rock solid, slightly high idling, sound that it would make at idle. On the move, along with the the spooling of the turbo, the wastegate flutter and some mild anti lag - i thought it sounded great (at the time) but i have never liked the 'missfire' sounding gimpreza....

But then i had come from a 944 Turbo that didn't really sound of anything. And i will admit that i went from the Evo to a 400bhp 300zx Twin Turbo and was happy with the (in comparison)silent 'turbine' noise it made.

Edited by richard300 on Thursday 26th September 15:27

melvster

6,841 posts

186 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
WCZ said:
8mr > this

wonder how many X 400's they sold?
Agree. For me a Red 340/360 would be perfection.

I think only 26 X FQ400's were sold and i bet some of those have now been exported. The list price was £50k.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

136 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
I need to stop reading this thread and all the stories in it from owners/previous owners, it makes me want one very, very badly.

Slow

6,973 posts

138 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Subaru and Mitsubishi both need to release a 500 bhp monster.

People mod these cars up to over 500 often already.

inman999

25,514 posts

174 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
fullthrottlehyde said:
Worst car I've ever had, this year alone it whent on the back of a low loader back to the dealer 4 times. Interior was rubbish, hammered fuel and sounded like a dyson. I should never have got rid of my ur quattro was more fun, sounded better and looked better. Mitsubushi are also awful to deal with.
TBF the fact that the interior is low rent, it likes a drink, doesn't make a great sound and the dealers are terrible are all well known and completely misses the point of these cars.

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
One dayy I WILL have an Evo, fking love them.

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Slow said:
Subaru and Mitsubishi both need to release a 500 bhp monster.
Who would buy it though? A couple of people on PH saying they would is not good enough.

SMcP114

2,916 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
I had an Evo 10 for approx two weeks and sold it to a site member. Absolutely hated it. He's since sold it on. If that's your thing, great, but I doubt many of us have went from an earlier Evo to a 10 and rated it.


ron130888

131 posts

170 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Does anyone have experience of the 260hp model?

M@1975

591 posts

228 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Captainawesome said:
From personal experience of driving an Evo 7 and a modded R32 GTR back to back they are completely different cars. I bought the Evo as it felt like a ballet dancer compared to the Skyline. Was gutted to be honest as I had always loved Skylines and wanted to love it but it just felt huge and slow compared to the Evo.

I would have an Evo every time. I own an FQ 360 but it is a weekend car. The rate at which the fuel gauge drops (not helped by the tiny tank) is just bloody terrifying. I am usually at the pumps twice in a day when hooning it. Couldn't live with that day to day, and my daily is 475bhp and much better on fuel.
I'd agree when talking about the R32, much more about straight line speed and there is a vast difference in age and technology between the R32 and the Evo 7. My R32 was a wonderful thing and I loved it to bits but it was not a nimble thing compared to a rally bred car and wasn't designed to be. When I was looking at Evos I was in an R33 which is much closer to the Evo 5/6 experience but still a very different car built to do different things, lets face it touring car background vs rally car are 2 platforms built for different disciplines.

I still cannot get over the fact an BR26DETT was more economical even with hybrid turbos and the boost at 14psi.

Still, fantastic cars and the Evo and Supra will be 2 things on my car list I will probably always regret not buying. Much as I'd love to have one or both on the driveway other priorities have taken over these days adn I'm only just hanging onto the 911!

Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Never got on with the Evo X - far too much Lancer and not enough Evo.

OldBob

290 posts

160 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
I owned exactly this model and colour for about a year.
The SST in sport (or super sport) auto was fantastic as an A-B missile, always keeping you on song. There is very little that would be able to stay with or get away from one around fast A/B roads.
You won't get 26mpg out of it, other than a long motorway journey at 56mph.
The interior was a bit ropey and rattly, but well equipped.
However duelling as a road racer (or is that ricer ;-) when the hooligan comes out in you, and a family hauler four door practical saloon, for a reasonable price I was delighted with it.
The soundtrack was a bit muted and the car felt FQ (you know what that stands for) rather than being a particularly fast car, if that makes sense.
Mine was very reliable.

Traded up into a GTR to get my next fix, but I do miss the practicality of the super saloon aspect of the Evo.

scaffolder

11 posts

174 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
I'm one of the loons that runs an Evo X as my daily driver, doing 30k per year smile Both my X's have been the 5 speed manual, and have returned 22-23mpg average - the SST should return better with a longer 6th speed. Definitely not up to german build quality standards, but a lot better than earlier model Evo's or Impreza's. Some owners have had numerous problems, but both mine have been pretty reliable, with only minor niggles resolved under warranty.

The only problem I've had, as with most owners, is the urge to tinker and upgrade - coilover suspension, bigger brakes, wider tyres, etc. and then add some trackday expenditure as well smile

LancerG

2,870 posts

276 months

Thursday 26th September 2013
quotequote all
Love my Evo 8MR - its a true bullet - nothing can catch it over the A/B roads.

Honestly, if you havnt driven one hard, then you dont qualify to ever talk about evo's

The only thing I could replace it with, costs 50k used.