For the 'natural aspirators' - How tuned is your engine?

For the 'natural aspirators' - How tuned is your engine?

Author
Discussion

carl_w

9,204 posts

259 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
TVR AJP8 4.2 599
TVR AJP8 4.5 654
TVR AJP6 4.0 653

leafspring

7,032 posts

138 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
Wait I can beat the low score record

2286cc DIESEL Land Rover from 1960

90.49mm bore (same engine block as the petrol teacher), 4 cyl, 62hp = 195rofl

KM666

1,757 posts

184 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
Astra G 1.8 sport (x18xe1)

Bore 80.5
Cyl 4
Bhp (claimed) 115

PI 458

But its got a derestricted airbox and K&N element so probably more like 150bhp, 170bhp when the stickers are taken into account. Making it a rather more respectable 677. biggrin

Kozy

Original Poster:

3,169 posts

219 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
leafspring said:
Wait I can beat the low score record

2286cc DIESEL Land Rover from 1960

90.49mm bore (same engine block as the petrol teacher), 4 cyl, 62hp = 195rofl
I'm not sure we can count diesels unfortunately, but that really is comically low. hehe

Major Fallout

5,278 posts

232 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
114 for the speedster :-( But it's developing twice as much power as stock haha

360 ish for the tvr.

547 for the bmw

680 for the Lola

And about 800 for the lotus engines in the racing cars. :-)

I'm happy with that, I will need to change the head for over head valves to get over 120 in the speedster really. To double the power again I would have to spend about 6-7k. Something to do later on in life.

Kozy

Original Poster:

3,169 posts

219 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
Major Fallout said:
114 for the speedster :-( But it's developing twice as much power as stock haha


I'm happy with that, I will need to change the head for over head valves to get over 120 in the speedster really. To double the power again I would have to spend about 6-7k. Something to do later on in life.
Well that puts paid to my theory about low PI engines being cheap to get more power from!

JordanTurbo

937 posts

142 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
My C5 shape Audi S6 scores a respectable 605 smile

84.5mm bore
8 cylinders
335 bhp

Edited by JordanTurbo on Saturday 12th October 23:48

Huff

3,167 posts

192 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
R1 5PW engine in my Fury: 74mm bore, 165hp from 998cc = score of 777.

leafspring

7,032 posts

138 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
1.0 Citroen AX Dimension = 263

1.4 Renault 5 Campus Prima = 270

scratchchin

ezi

1,734 posts

187 months

Saturday 12th October 2013
quotequote all
2.0 Duratec Fiesta ST
Bore 87.5
Cylinders 4
Power 190

Score: 637

Dodsy

7,173 posts

228 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
Ok so not 4 cylinders but I checked my old and new jags

XJ8 - 86mm bore 8 cylinders na 300bhp , PI 523 should be capable of 574bhp
XJR - 86mm bore 8 cylinders supercharged 400bhp PI 697 also capable of 574bhp





Edited by Dodsy on Sunday 13th October 00:06

XJ Flyer

5,526 posts

131 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
I think the important thing is getting the combination and ratio of bore and stroke measurements right and the resulting compromise between good top end power and low down torque not just concentrating on specific power outputs.Remembering that the stroke measurement doesn't just add to the engine capacity it also adds to the leverage of the piston on the crank and it's torque that makes acceleration not top end power.While in many real world examples the increase in torque also provides around the same or even more specific power at the top end.Such as in the case of the Jaguar XJRS 6.0 Litre engine which produced around the same specific top end power with a lower compression ratio compared to the old 5.3 HE with the advantage that it's produced at lower engine speed.

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
4AGE blacktop (Toyota)
81mm bore (77 mm stroke)
162 bhp

PI = 637

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
KM666 said:
Astra G 1.8 sport (x18xe1)
BHP (claimed) 115
...
But its got a derestricted airbox and K&N element so probably more like 150bhp, 170bhp when the stickers are taken into account
...
That made me laugh.

One day I will release my "sticker dyno". You enter the number and size of the performance stickers on the car, and the number of rear wing elements, and it tells you how much power the owner thinks they have.

Edited by AW111 on Sunday 13th October 02:05

DanielSan

18,823 posts

168 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
S2000 is already answered in the OP, so of the road cars so far I shall just merely claim a smug victory hehe

Rick 343

54 posts

136 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
I got 836 for the E46 M3 not 811?

ETA just noticed your on us spec with 333bhp

dvs_dave

8,674 posts

226 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
carl_w said:
TVR AJP8 4.2 599
TVR AJP8 4.5 654
TVR AJP6 4.0 653
If we're using factory quoted numbers (as everyone else is) then the TVR Speed Six 4.0 S spec PI is 756. If it were tuned to F1 levels then 536hp is your lot.

For a popular comparison, a Chevy LS3 crate PI is 520

Edited by dvs_dave on Sunday 13th October 06:06


Edited by dvs_dave on Sunday 13th October 06:17

DJP

1,198 posts

180 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
Volvo V70 - 5 cylinders, 83mm bore, 2435cc, 140bhp = 419

Bandit 1250 - 4 cylinders, 79mm bore, 1255cc, 100bhp = 413

Both lazy lumps, but it seems counter-intuitive that the bike, with 71% of the power from 51% of the capacity, should be in a lower state of tune than the car engine.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
Alpina B3 3.3

Bore 86.4
Cylinders 6
Power 280

PIes 645

Escy

3,954 posts

150 months

Sunday 13th October 2013
quotequote all
Porsche 968 - Bore 104, 4 cylinders, power 236bhp = PI 563
Porsche Boxster 2.5 - Bore 85.5, 6 cylinders, power 201bhp = PI 473


I've never owned a Porsche, I tend to buy cars based on engines and Porsche make nothing decent anywhere near my budget. I don't know how Porsche get away with selling such rubbish as sports cars. No wonder they are perceived as reliable with the power they produce. Maybe they used the blueprints from the 2.2 Land Rover engine posted earlier?!