Is there a better cheap track car than an MX5?

Is there a better cheap track car than an MX5?

Author
Discussion

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

191 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
doogz said:
True but he says £2k.

And I've never seen a £1k MX-5 that didn't require some serious rust removal/repair. And I looked for one for a while.
Ah yes, of course the older MX5s seem to be rusting as badly as the mk1 MR2.

Cyder

7,053 posts

220 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
james_gt3rs said:
doogz said:
True but he says £2k.

And I've never seen a £1k MX-5 that didn't require some serious rust removal/repair. And I looked for one for a while.
Ah yes, of course the older MX5s seem to be rusting as badly as the mk1 MR2.
Mine was £430 and doesn't! tongue out

It has some other issues, but rust isn't one of them!

mikey P 500

1,239 posts

187 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
I sold my track prepped mx5 for 1k which is about the going rate. It had covered alot of track miles but was completely reliable. They are great fun but after about 20 track days or so I wanted something faster. Sadly anything faster costs alot more.

juansolo

3,012 posts

278 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
doogz said:
vrooom said:
What about MR2 mk3 ? mid mounted rear engine, rear wheel drive.. ?
Yup, this is a correct answer. Bit trickier to drive at the limit, but more fun, IMO.
3rded or 4thed. Whatever we're at now.

From the perspective of a cheap track car that just works out of the box and is brilliant fun, the mk3 mr2 takes some beating.

roystinho

3,767 posts

175 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
Clio 172 for me. Loved mine, could've done with some better coilovers and some stickier rubber though, but then it was only meant to be a cheap bit of fun, not an out and out weapon.

(Though if I hadn't have crashed it I might have upgraded it over time...)

Robert Elise

956 posts

145 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
Eunos - tend to have less rust (depending when they were imported)
Worth talking to AutoLink in Southampton. True enthusiasts who could build a track car at reasonable price (source, rustproof, basic mods).

DanielJames

7,543 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
If it has to be RWD, I'm pretty sure a 328i E36 would spank an MX5.

DanielJames

7,543 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
...and can I just say - I was on a trackday the other day were there were a few MX5s, and one of them (presumably the only one without a turbo) was ridiculously slow. I really don't see the hype in these cars.

Kawasicki

13,090 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
DanielJames said:
...and can I just say - I was on a trackday the other day were there were a few MX5s, and one of them (presumably the only one without a turbo) was ridiculously slow. I really don't see the hype in these cars.
A good driver in a NA mx5 will be way faster than a bad driver in a turbo mx5!

urquattroGus

1,847 posts

190 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
Yes, Clio 172 phase 1. Pissed past MX5's of all ages on the last track day I did with mine. Bought for £1500.

Granted, I don't have the RWD pleasure, but on the plus side I don't look like a hairdresser in the process, maybe just a chav.


Robert Elise

956 posts

145 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
DanielJames said:
...and can I just say - I was on a trackday the other day were there were a few MX5s, and one of them (presumably the only one without a turbo) was ridiculously slow. I really don't see the hype in these cars.
In the corners they're fun, help you learn a lot and actually spank a lot of cars.... They are not fast over a lap no, in fact slow.
OP asked about cheap car. Stripped out 328 would be great, but not cheap. Cheaper than an M3 yes.
Best cheap track car is MX5. Possible consideration for MR2. Upgrade later according to budget.
Mine would be a Noble, but that ain't cheap.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
As mentioned I think the MR2 mk3 is probably the only competitor, unless you can get a DC2 for 2k.

ecsrobin

17,123 posts

165 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
DanielJames said:
...and can I just say - I was on a trackday the other day were there were a few MX5s, and one of them (presumably the only one without a turbo) was ridiculously slow. I really don't see the hype in these cars.
Or maybe the driver wasn't as experienced?

DanielJames

7,543 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
Robert Elise said:
DanielJames said:
...and can I just say - I was on a trackday the other day were there were a few MX5s, and one of them (presumably the only one without a turbo) was ridiculously slow. I really don't see the hype in these cars.
In the corners they're fun, help you learn a lot and actually spank a lot of cars.... They are not fast over a lap no, in fact slow.
OP asked about cheap car. Stripped out 328 would be great, but not cheap. Cheaper than an M3 yes.
Best cheap track car is MX5. Possible consideration for MR2. Upgrade later according to budget.
Mine would be a Noble, but that ain't cheap.
How is the best cheap track car an MX5, if they aren't really 'good' on track?

You could get a 328i SE, stip it, fit good suspension, upgrade the brakes, all for 2k.

DanielJames

7,543 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
Kozy said:
Unless you can get a DC2 for 2k.
Even knackered ones are still fetching 2k, if Honda is your flavour you could build a B18c4 EG with Integra suspension/brakes for 2k. That would be a laugh.

Anything but an MX5 lol.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
DanielJames said:
Anything but an MX5 lol.
Have you ever driven one?

I've own one, and I've driven a 328 E36. The BM was terrible. Crap steering. Heavy. Big. Sounded nice and was pretty grunty, but that was where it's charm stopped to be honest.

The MX5 is the opposite. Great steering. Light. Small. Nimble. Sounds ste and is a bit slow.

But, get this: You can make a slow car faster.

You can't make a slow steering, big heavy boat into something small, nimble and responsive...

braddo

10,485 posts

188 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
DanielJames said:
You could get a 328i SE, stip it, fit good suspension, upgrade the brakes, all for 2k.
I seriously doubt you would get a 328i track ready and reliable for £2k. Do the track prepped ones ever sell for less than that?

£2k spent on a track prepped MX5 would be far better way to spend the budget, as well having better reliability and lower running costs.

DanielJames

7,543 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
Kozy said:
DanielJames said:
Anything but an MX5 lol.
Have you ever driven one?

I've own one, and I've driven a 328 E36. The BM was terrible. Crap steering. Heavy. Big. Sounded nice and was pretty grunty, but that was where it's charm stopped to be honest.

The MX5 is the opposite. Great steering. Light. Small. Nimble. Sounds ste and is a bit slow.

But, get this: You can make a slow car faster.

You can't make a slow steering, big heavy boat into something small, nimble and responsive...
Aye, and they're slow. The only thing I liked about it was the Nardi steering wheel, which was pretty cool.

The 328i has pretty good steering, perhaps something was wrong with the one you drove. Feedback is positive and well weighted. They are heavy, but they were never designed to be track cars were they? I am biased, but I do genuinely think they are amazing cars, stupidly quiet driving to work but still sound great when you put your foot down.

Every second one on the BMW forums is a track car, so I don't think they are as bad as your making out.

You can make a slow car faster, but £ for £, can an MX5 ever beat a 328i around the track? That's a genuine question, I know not a lot about MX5 tuning, other than they are commonly turbo'd.

DanielJames

7,543 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
braddo said:
DanielJames said:
You could get a 328i SE, stip it, fit good suspension, upgrade the brakes, all for 2k.
I seriously doubt you would get a 328i track ready and reliable for £2k. Do the track prepped ones ever sell for less than that?

£2k spent on a track prepped MX5 would be far better way to spend the budget, as well having better reliability and lower running costs.
I guess thats what you define as track ready.

Like for like, I doubt there would be much in it.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Thursday 24th October 2013
quotequote all
DanielJames said:
Aye, and they're slow. The only thing I liked about it was the Nardi steering wheel, which was pretty cool.

The 328i has pretty good steering, perhaps something was wrong with the one you drove. Feedback is positive and well weighted. They are heavy, but they were never designed to be track cars were they? I am biased, but I do genuinely think they are amazing cars, stupidly quiet driving to work but still sound great when you put your foot down.

Every second one on the BMW forums is a track car, so I don't think they are as bad as your making out.

You can make a slow car faster, but £ for £, can an MX5 ever beat a 328i around the track? That's a genuine question, I know not a lot about MX5 tuning, other than they are commonly turbo'd.
A 328 is 197bhp and probably about 1250kg stripped out so 157bhp/tonne.
You can supercharge one for about a grand. That will give it about 170bhp, or 161bhp/tonne.

£1k MX5 + £1k supercharger = Faster than a £2k E36, as well as cheaper on consumables and a better steer. (And they are a better steer, by a long margin)