Bloodhound LSR Thread As Requested...

Bloodhound LSR Thread As Requested...

Author
Discussion

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Front suspension dry build is coming along nicely.




mk2 24v

646 posts

164 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Looks bloody marvellous biggrin

And how big is the HTP pump on the previous page?
Nothing there to gauge its size against wink

CraigyMc

16,392 posts

236 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
First part of the car ready, increased efficiency HTP pump i've been working on is almost complete. Art or engineering????

What does the other side look like?

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
mk2 24v said:
Looks bloody marvellous biggrin

And how big is the HTP pump on the previous page?
Nothing there to gauge its size against wink
O/D is roughly 355.60mm

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
I'm not sure i've seen it asked or answered, but what is the principal control strategy for the AJ133? Is it just being sent a torque demand that is the result of closed loop catalyst chamber HTHP inlet pressure? I assume with 3 parallel rocket motors, some form of orifice plate or valve will also be necessary to balance HTHP flow into each motor?

Tyre Tread

10,534 posts

216 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
O/D is roughly 355.60mm
Only an engineer...

smile

Looks amazing!

Sonic

4,007 posts

207 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
First part of the car ready, increased efficiency HTP pump i've been working on is almost complete. Art or engineering????

That is rather gorgeous so clearly a bit of both... rather like a set of Oakley X-metal sunglasses biggrin

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
Front suspension dry build is coming along nicely.



not wishing to be impertinent, but why the lower link design like this?

(what I am getting at is with any movement at all on the joints is going to create some steering angle?)

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
not wishing to be impertinent, but why the lower link design like this?

(what I am getting at is with any movement at all on the joints is going to create some steering angle?)
Gives us the correct suspension geometry. I theory we needed longer wishbones, so we have two seperate arms, giving a virtual king pin

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
I'm not sure i've seen it asked or answered, but what is the principal control strategy for the AJ133? Is it just being sent a torque demand that is the result of closed loop catalyst chamber HTHP inlet pressure? I assume with 3 parallel rocket motors, some form of orifice plate or valve will also be necessary to balance HTHP flow into each motor?
I'm no software engineer, I'll get the explanation in lay-mans terms for you. May be tomorrow though as it's x'mas party lunch/evening meals & I', on my second bottle of Katy.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
Gives us the correct suspension geometry. I theory we needed longer wishbones, so we have two seperate arms, giving a virtual king pin
understand that, are you not worried about load affected steering though?




McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

204 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Does that mean the two lower arms cause the bottom of the upright to move in a arc.

And the centre of that arc is your virtual kingpin?

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Thursday 11th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
Max_Torque said:
I'm not sure i've seen it asked or answered, but what is the principal control strategy for the AJ133? Is it just being sent a torque demand that is the result of closed loop catalyst chamber HTHP inlet pressure? I assume with 3 parallel rocket motors, some form of orifice plate or valve will also be necessary to balance HTHP flow into each motor?
I'm no software engineer, I'll get the explanation in lay-mans terms for you. May be tomorrow though as it's x'mas party lunch/evening meals & I', on my second bottle of Katy.
We are going to characterize the pump performance, from there we will be able the simply drive the engine to a rev target.

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
Spent the morning showing monkey boy around the car, he was like a kid in a sweet shop.

The Don of Croy

5,993 posts

159 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
Front suspension dry build is coming along nicely.

Looks like you have both Warren Mitchell and Mark Steele involved...

Somewhere at home is a copy of Guinness Book of Records from 2009'ish with a two page splurge all about the project (as it was then) and how it would be running the following year. Seriously dented my opinion of that publication.

morgs_

1,663 posts

187 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
Spent the morning showing monkey boy around the car, he was like a kid in a sweet shop.
More fodder for the Photoshop thread hehe



Couldn't agree more with what he wrote, it was fantastic to visit.

monkey said:
My first visit to @BLOODHOUND_SSC today. Can't stop walking around with a big grin, shaking my head at the brilliant absurdity of it all.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
IN51GHT said:
Max_Torque said:
I'm not sure i've seen it asked or answered, but what is the principal control strategy for the AJ133? Is it just being sent a torque demand that is the result of closed loop catalyst chamber HTHP inlet pressure? I assume with 3 parallel rocket motors, some form of orifice plate or valve will also be necessary to balance HTHP flow into each motor?
I'm no software engineer, I'll get the explanation in lay-mans terms for you. May be tomorrow though as it's x'mas party lunch/evening meals & I', on my second bottle of Katy.
We are going to characterize the pump performance, from there we will be able the simply drive the engine to a rev target.
You have a pretty good estimate of engine flywheel torque sent out over CAN from the Denso EMS, so also knowing the crankspeed, and drive ratio, you can calculate pump power within a few percent i should think. At the least, this will help tell you that the HTHP flow / consumption and catalyst pressures are nominal during the runs / tests!

IN51GHT

Original Poster:

8,777 posts

210 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
The two impellers for the car spec HTP pump arrived yesterday. I rather pleased with them.















PowerslideSWE

1,116 posts

138 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
IN51GHT said:
The two impellers for the car spec HTP pump arrived yesterday. I rather pleased with them.











And I trought that p0rn was not permitted on PH biggrin Those are works of art simply put.

Blib

44,014 posts

197 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Please sir. What are they made of & how are they made?