RE: Smart Roadster: Tell Me I'm Wrong

RE: Smart Roadster: Tell Me I'm Wrong

Author
Discussion

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
'Styling still looks fresh a decade on'. Have to disagree with that, ugly when they came out and IMO ugly now.

DMN

2,984 posts

140 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
hondansx said:
it's just that it is for a lady about town, not a track day hero.
A few years back several Roadsters had a great time at Cadwell Park in pouring November rain, its more than capable on track as it carries far more speed through the corners. I've been back to Cadwell in mine a few times and shown more powerful cars up. Granted things might be different at Silverstone, but for a cheap and fun track-able car, there ain't much better out there.

GregE240

10,857 posts

268 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
No.

Horrid, horrid, horrid. Dull and lifeless steering, and a gearbox that makes you want to get out and beat it with a branch. Hateful in manual, unpredictable in auto. Its slower than a slow thing.

It looks like its made out of bits of other cars.

The interior is okay.

You're wrong, Dan.

redroadster

1,746 posts

233 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
My smart roadster is moving slowly to completion fitted with cooper s supercharged engine,we have fitted mini dash, all wired up working, suspension is taking time up now will be on road in 2014 been quite a job but will be worth it i think !

137699

8 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
GregE240 said:
No.

Horrid, horrid, horrid. Dull and lifeless steering, and a gearbox that makes you want to get out and beat it with a branch. Hateful in manual, unpredictable in auto. Its slower than a slow thing.

It looks like its made out of bits of other cars.

The interior is okay.

You're wrong, Dan.
Err... have you driven one?

Baryonyx

18,001 posts

160 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Amirhussain said:
'Styling still looks fresh a decade on'. Have to disagree with that, ugly when they came out and IMO ugly now.
They are awful looking things. The coupe shape is nice in silhouette but looks pretty grim in the light. The interior is dreadful too. It's a strange car because the concept is excellent, but the execution is lacking, it's like they couldn't quite get away from Smart's history of building naff city cars with this one.

mikebradford

2,523 posts

146 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Loved theses when they came out
and i agree with many others
the concept makes so much sense today

reminds me in principle of the Audi A2
they created a solution for the market before it was neede
but yet today, both cars look good, and make more sense than ever

GregE240

10,857 posts

268 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
137699 said:
GregE240 said:
No.

Horrid, horrid, horrid. Dull and lifeless steering, and a gearbox that makes you want to get out and beat it with a branch. Hateful in manual, unpredictable in auto. Its slower than a slow thing.

It looks like its made out of bits of other cars.

The interior is okay.

You're wrong, Dan.
Err... have you driven one?
Yes, I have. I drove one around Edinburgh in about December 2009. It belonged to a PM colleague of mine. Have you driven one?

Why the hell would I make comments on a car I've not driven?

shandyboy

472 posts

155 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Skinley said:
300bhp/ton said:
If there is a better more livable every day sports car I don't know of it.
1970 455ci trans am?
Will I be able to insure one of those for £248.71 a year and average 50mpg?

y2blade

56,129 posts

216 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I love mine :- )

Will have had it 4 years in Feb. It's my daily driver for circa 80 miles a day. It lives 24/7 outside. On the way to work this morning it ticked over the 100,000 mark. And when I filled it up yesterday it worked out at 53.4mpg.

If there is a better more livable every day sports car I don't know of it.

And I love the gearbox, it's one of the best features of the car along with the noise the 3 pot makes. Handles well and always puts a smile on your face and has pretty good luggage space.

It's a crap town car though and the gearbox doesn't not work well in town traffic. It's at home hammering down B roads and back lanes.
I didn't realise "that" was 300bhp/ton yikes


Dazed & Confused

202 posts

205 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
redroadster said:
My smart roadster is moving slowly to completion fitted with cooper s supercharged engine,we have fitted mini dash, all wired up working, suspension is taking time up now will be on road in 2014 been quite a job but will be worth it i think !
Pics? That sounds cool. What are you doing for gearbox and steering?

137699

8 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
GregE240 said:
Yes, I have. I drove one around Edinburgh in about December 2009. It belonged to a PM colleague of mine. Have you driven one?

Why the hell would I make comments on a car I've not driven?
Well there seem to be plenty of people on here who have not but seem to declare themselves experts on the engine, steering & gearbox.

137699

8 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
What is weak about the engine?

dom9

8,090 posts

210 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
I'm in the 'missed opportunity' camp with these too...

I sat in one at the Motorshow and really wanted one but I waited until they were released and the gearbox was just horrible frown

everyone who has owned one, who I know, really rates it. My buddy rates it as more fun than the Cayman he replaced it with.

I do wonder (although it's underpowered) whether the 3-pot, manual engine/ 'box combo of the C1, 107, Aygo would work in this car?

That could be an interesting project and the bike engined ones appear to fly!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Root Ginger said:
I purchased a Smart for my wife and we both drove it regularly for three years and I drove a Smart Roadster for a while. That's how I know the Smart Pulse was the only model with the extended overboost initally, the top spec Passion did not have this. The roadster then had the same extended overboost in all models (Pure, Pulse and Passion). It was widely reported in the motoring press that the Roadster was not a sales success and why it was pulled. The numbers it sold were a small fraction compared to the City Coupé. For example in 2001 46,000 Smart City Coupés were sold in Germany alone.
Sports cars generally sell less. Take a look at GT86 vs Yaris, or Z4 vs 3 Series.

Do you know if there was a UK allocation too? Basically if you can only get hold of 'x' number of cars, then you really can't sell more. I'm sure Jeep will tell you the Wrangler Rubicon didn't sell in the UK, but what they won't tell you is only 19 cars where allocated to the UK, all sold some 6-10 months in advance. But still 19 cars is a low total number.

fastgerman

1,915 posts

196 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
I sat in one of these at a motorshow with a friend and our shoulders touched - we aren't that big before you start....

The only person I know who likes these had a green Megane, then a Fiat 500 and changes gear at 2000 rpm to save fuel

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
NOT wrong, but RIGHT !

This car is massively ahead of its time. They fumbled it a bit with the dodgy detailing and crude gearbox, but the basic principle was very, very, sound indeed.

They should have stuck with it. Something like this with an EV would be definitely a car of our times ( sadly ) .


Roy C

4,187 posts

285 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
137699 said:
Oh and it's not that they didn't sell well... problem was they sold TOO well. And Merc made a loss on every one they sold. Hence why it was killed off so early. The longer they kept selling them, the more money they were haemorrhaging.
Don't forget all those warranty claims too. I bet they're still SMARTing from that (every pun intended). hehe

Didn't it come bottom in somebody's survey of UK-available cars reliability at the time?

peterbredde

775 posts

201 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
I almost bought one way back when. I loved it on test drive and wangled an extended test. It was novel, and at the time IMHO unique and interesting.

But ultimately, it was made of st, and the auto box was dog-pap. I couldn't get past the scooter engine either, which although impressice for its size, should have been fitted to a mobility scooter instead.

I bought an MX-5 instead, and I never looked back.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Great concept ruined by a fragile engine, slow gearbox, average build.

You're wrong.