RE: VW confirms Polo R

Author
Discussion

abbotsmike

1,033 posts

146 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
A few years down the line I had provisionally planned to go and buy a V6 S4 avant. If this can be fitted with a towbar, I might want one of these instead!

George29

14,707 posts

165 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
abbotsmike said:
A few years down the line I had provisionally planned to go and buy a V6 S4 avant. If this can be fitted with a towbar, I might want one of these instead!
The GTI couldn't (technically not approved for towing). No reason why it couldn't though. My S3 wasn't approved for towing but did a fine job in towing my motorbike.

ETA: when I get one of these I will be having a towbar fitted.

Edited by George29 on Friday 24th January 12:13

Court_S

13,001 posts

178 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
I quite like the idea. The GTi is quite a handsome looking little hot hatch. It's quite grown up which is no bad thing because not everyone wants a Fiesta ST.

I agree though with the others who say that it could be a tad more aggressive, but the previous R models (Mk IV R32 excluded) have all been really subtle.

The potential deal breaker could be the cost of it. If it's significantly more than the competition it'll alienate a lot of potential customers and the current GTi hasn't been a huge sales success judging by how few seem to be on the road.

WCZ

10,537 posts

195 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
to be honest i'm suprised that the response hasn't been overwhelmingly positive, isn't this the car that everyone has been whining about not existing!?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
WCZ said:
to be honest i'm suprised that the response hasn't been overwhelmingly positive, isn't this the car that everyone has been whining about not existing!?
If it wasn't from VAG, it would possibly get a less frosty reception. It ticks most of the boxes for a fun rally rep rocket, aside from the badge. Even the price isn't that bad on a bang for buck basis.

VW seem to be pushing the silly models quite hard, with the Golf R Evo announced also.

Vladimir

6,917 posts

159 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
mini me said:
Im more concerned about the majority of them seemingly having had lobotomies.
Nail on head.

Robert Lees

550 posts

142 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
The Golf R is too expensive for what it is prev and current version. A remapped gti will be on par for performance with lower running costs. Ok no 4wd but really...

Polo could be a good little car. I say little .. Not much size difference between 13 reg polo and my mk5 gti, few inches hera and there.

tempted by the polo as replacing my current gti ( mk5) for similar specced mk7 is £30k+

projectgt

318 posts

161 months

Saturday 25th January 2014
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
In transverse engined VAG products it has.
Indeed, all too rare.

loudlashadjuster

5,132 posts

185 months

Saturday 25th January 2014
quotequote all
George29 said:
abbotsmike said:
A few years down the line I had provisionally planned to go and buy a V6 S4 avant. If this can be fitted with a towbar, I might want one of these instead!
The GTI couldn't (technically not approved for towing). No reason why it couldn't though. My S3 wasn't approved for towing but did a fine job in towing my motorbike.

ETA: when I get one of these I will be having a towbar fitted.

Edited by George29 on Friday 24th January 12:13
Beware, if the vehicle's type approval doesn't permit tow bar attachment then you could well find your insurance null and void in the event of a crash. Looked into this after discovering a previous VW wasn't rated for towing and I was shocked at how black and white this all was, regardless of the availability of aftermarket tow bars (TÜV rated etc.) for that model.

Pixelpeep

8,600 posts

143 months

Saturday 25th January 2014
quotequote all
4 wheel drive, 250bhp, VW build quality in a tiny little super mini.. YES PLEASE!

LasseV

1,754 posts

134 months

Sunday 26th January 2014
quotequote all
Pixelpeep said:
4 wheel drive, 250bhp, VW build quality in a tiny little super mini.. YES PLEASE!
What quality?

Kenny Powers

2,618 posts

128 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Brilliant news for everyone. This is the kind of thing that brings about fantastic choice and competition. The performance sector is on fire at the moment. Vast sums being invested. Anyone bemoaning the existence of cars such as this, would be well advised to consider the market without them.

I think Monkey wrote an article quite recently discussing [from memory] how lucky we are that the performance car market wasn't killed off by green legislation, and in fact is making a big comeback. In my opinion the guy was bang on, and cars like this can only help spur other manufacturers into considering similar machines. Any petrol head who considers performance car choices negatively, is probably a little bit silly.


loudlashadjuster

5,132 posts

185 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Kenny Powers said:
Brilliant news for everyone. This is the kind of thing that brings about fantastic choice and competition. The performance sector is on fire at the moment. Vast sums being invested. Anyone bemoaning the existence of cars such as this, would be well advised to consider the market without them.

I think Monkey wrote an article quite recently discussing [from memory] how lucky we are that the performance car market wasn't killed off by green legislation, and in fact is making a big comeback. In my opinion the guy was bang on, and cars like this can only help spur other manufacturers into considering similar machines. Any petrol head who considers performance car choices negatively, is probably a little bit silly.
What are you doing here with your balanced and reasonable opinion, lack of negativity and refusal to denigrate entire sections of the market/society?!

Clivey

5,110 posts

205 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Axionknight said:
va1o said:
Oh and I'd be more than happy if its DSG only. That gearbox is phenomenal and once you've experienced it there is no going back to Manual.
Really, says who, apart from you?
Certainly not me. - I like DSG and personally would choose it in this car but also appreciate manuals and the choice thereof. In many cars I wouldn't have anything other than a 3-pedal manual and would actively avoid certain models because of the lack of choice. Choice and variety are good things.

As for this car…the 2.0-litre, compared to using a 1.6, would also give more scope for further tuning, would it not? evil

personally I'd like to see VW calibrate the Haldex system to send 50>% of the power rearward and use Saab-esque torque vectoring on the rear as well as XDS on the front…then we really will have something pretty close to a road-going WRC car. After watching last season and the Monte Carlo just gone, you can see that's faster and more fun. wink

hondafreek

225 posts

171 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Brilliant news. I love how the new polo looks, especially the GTI. It is still bigger than the Mk1 Golf. Looking forward to this, can't afford a new one, but would love a second hand one, one day.

Wills2

22,893 posts

176 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I like the look of this, I sat in a polo GTI recently and thought it was a Golf GTI (I know I know) but they are quite big these days, well compared to the 2 Polos I had back in the 80's.


GTRene

16,603 posts

225 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
said:
Verdict









4 stars


Fast, strong, agile and grippy, the Polo R prototytpe delivers an all-new dimension to the Volkswagen Polo. Depending on pricing (and Volkswagen insiders are suggesting it will come in at close to £22,000), this could be VW’s new cult car and will put more internal pressure on Audi’s upcoming S1. Who knows, perhaps it’s the final motivation Ford needs to finally give a Fiesta RS the green light.


Read more: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/volkswagen/polo/85376...
sounds good for the money.

FamilyDub

3,587 posts

166 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Clivey said:
Certainly not me. - I like DSG and personally would choose it in this car but also appreciate manuals and the choice thereof. In many cars I wouldn't have anything other than a 3-pedal manual and would actively avoid certain models because of the lack of choice. Choice and variety are good things.
STOP SPOUTING TOTAL SENSE ON A VAG PRODUCT THREAD!



hehe

b0rk

2,310 posts

147 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Clivey said:
As for this car…the 2.0-litre, compared to using a 1.6, would also give more scope for further tuning, would it not? evil
Depends on the variant if it's detuned from the (Golf) R version which I'd suspect it will be then, I'd guess mid 300's would be achievable software only based on what the tunners are hinting for Golf's/S3's bounce
If it's the normal GTI version then 270ish software only or 300ish with hardware mods, still quite a weapon.

However the standard brakes will probably be censored as per usual so expect to see these littering the local hedgerows and ditches within weeks of first delivery, do Golf 340mm dia front discs and calipers fit?

Colonial

13,553 posts

206 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
va1o said:
Oh and I'd be more than happy if its DSG only. That gearbox is phenomenal and once you've experienced it there is no going back to Manual.
I happily bought my Golf R in a manual after trying DSG. The manual is a nicer gearbox to use and doesn't have ongoing reliability concerns.