New car every 3 years

Author
Discussion

Ozzie Osmond

Original Poster:

21,189 posts

247 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Sure, some people like to have a brand new car on the drive every 3 years. It's what they want, it's what they can afford, good luck.

IMO it's the most expensive way possible to own cars.

Question: If you could afford it, would you do the "3 year new-car change" or something else?


PS. By "afford" I don't mean like a premiership footballer who can buy 6 Ferraris anyway...

V8forweekends

2,485 posts

125 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
No. I have been able to afford it at various times and have preferred a house with a big garage for my old cars.

Fartgalen

6,641 posts

208 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
V8forweekends said:
No. I have been able to afford it at various times and have preferred a house with a big garage for my old cars.
Pretty much this.

David87

6,668 posts

213 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I've only bought a couple of new cars (and not on a 3-year cycle), but I can see the appeal of doing so. My Dad's done it ever since I can remember and, while it usually costs him quite a bit in depreciation, it's what he likes doing and can afford to! It also provides a steady stream of used cars for PHers! wink

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

167 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Leasing or PCP is the way to own a new car every few years. You can keep the cash value of the cars future value in the bank, rather than having it sat on the driveway. All costs are known up front, so there's no risk.

mini1380cc

2,944 posts

172 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
My uncle gets a new CRV every 3 years, sometimes in the exact same spec. Cars are past their best after 3 years and 20,000 miles you see. The Honda dealership in Fife absolutely love him as he pays screen price and takes rock bottom trade in. He seems happy though.

Limpet

6,335 posts

162 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I don't see the point, personally, but each to their own.

I understand the concept of replacing a car when it becomes unreliable, no longer does what you need it to do in some way, or even if you get just get bored with it and fancy a change, but just because it's 3 years old? I've known people replace a 3 year old car with a new one of the same model, and even in the same colour!

But hey, it helps the economy, keeps car manufacturers and dealers in business, and contributes to the healthy supply of used cars, all of which are good things.

blank

3,466 posts

189 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
It depends what sort of purchasing schemes you have access to.

My Astra was new in September and will be replaced in April. Then that will probably be replaced in October.

My neighbours on one side have just replaced their 13 plate A3 with a 63 plate Golf.

Other side has just replaced a 62 plate Golf with a 63 plate TT.

Lots of people have access to these schemes where they pay a couple of hundred quid a month and change car every 6 months or so.

Or maybe it's skewed as I live in Milton Keynes so VAG and Mercedes are just down the road!

NPI

1,310 posts

125 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
blank said:
Or maybe it's skewed as I live in Milton Keynes so VAG and Mercedes are just down the road!
That doesn't explain how / why you change your Astra every 6 mths!

thatdude

2,655 posts

128 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I overheard someone on the train conversing about cars, and stated something along the lines of "after 3 years it's good to change anyway, things start to go wrong and it gets expensive"

I'm not certain how informed he was about the need to routinely service and maintain a vehicle

Of course, if you want to change your vehicles all the time, go for it! Variety is the spice of life etc etc

bga

8,134 posts

252 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
mini1380cc said:
He seems happy though.
Which is the most important thing.


blank

3,466 posts

189 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
NPI said:
That doesn't explain how / why you change your Astra every 6 mths!
I have access to the Vauxhall scheme (Vauxhall are also local).

Graham

16,368 posts

285 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
The last road car I bought was brand new, but that was in 2003. still got the same car owes me nothing, drives as well as it did new and i cant see any reason to change it. only done 96k. it does help that the new versions are fugly

HustleRussell

24,772 posts

161 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I'd have to be pretty excited about a car to want to buy it new (if I could afford it), and if I did buy it new I'd be intending to keep it for a very long time (5 years absolute minimum, more likely 7+, ideally for the car's entire lifetime). As such, I'm not sure I'll ever do it. When I get rich I'll probably lease something instead.

jdcampbell

1,231 posts

250 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Some contract hire deals are so cheap that I reckon it's better value than running something second hand.

All inclusive running costs on a 57 plate 330d that I had for about two years were around £330pm. I could have been running a new car on contract hire for that kind of money (not a 330d however as I d around 20k miles per year).

I have a mate running an E Class Mercedes E220CDi and it's costing him around £230 per month inc VAT. Sure it's not as cheap as running a banger, but it's pretty cheap. There won't be any big cost surprises because it'll be under warranty for as long as he has it.

HustleRussell said:
I'd have to be pretty excited about a car to want to buy it new (if I could afford it), and if I did buy it new I'd be intending to keep it for a very long time (5 years absolute minimum, more likely 7+, ideally for the car's entire lifetime). As such, I'm not sure I'll ever do it. When I get rich I'll probably lease something instead.
A while ago my wife ran a Vectra 2.5V6 SRi Estate for 7 years. After that period it averaged £220per month running costs (tax, repairs, maintenance, depreciation). When we were looking to change a Zafira cost £199 per month plus VAT on a contract hire - so broadly comparable. So for not much more money you could have a new car every 2/3 years, full warranty and no unscheduled repairs.

In the end we didn't like a Zafira and bought a VW Touran. Change it for a new one after two years and 25k miles and the cost to change was £4,000 - i.e.: £166 per month in depreciation. You could easily piss that sort of money away on an older car if you had an ABS failure or turbodiesel problems.

Keeping a car for a long time works, provided you don't get any unexpected big bills.


Edited by jdcampbell on Monday 27th January 12:15

Hackney

6,862 posts

209 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Budget. And low maintenance.

In my car I can't have an unreliable car. A new car should only require servicing and no other maintenance. You can plan when you book it in for a service.

If a car goes wrong, even if you're at home, you can't just get it fixed there and then. A VW place near me books 2-3 weeks in advance. So I'd be without a car for 3 weeks if anything went wrong. A good specialist is cheaper, but also busy. They don't open on a Saturday so it's time out of work to even go there.

Pick up a nice new car for £100-£200-£300 or what ever and that's all you'll pay month in month out until you stop. If it goes wrong it's covered by warranty so there's still no more to pay.

rallycross

12,846 posts

238 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I dont get this mind-set either.
EG my neighbour, leased from vw fairly basic diesel Golf, around £350 a month, just came to 3 years now (50k miles) and was given option to buy for under £8k (sounded cheap) but he handed it back, and took out another 3 year deal, over £300 month, so effectiely paying around £4k per year to rent a boring Golf. Why?

mdavids

675 posts

185 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
No but I know a couple of good mechanics who dont charge the earth so running an older car for me isn't so much of a gamble.

I can imagine many who've been landed with an unexpected bill for a new DPF or turbo, or spent many hours trying to get a complicated electrical fault fixed have came to the conclusion it's worth taking the guaranteed depreciation hit on a new car rather than gambling on a potentially ruinously unreliable used car.

bqf

2,232 posts

172 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
It's common knowledge that all people that buy new cars are idiots. Everyone in Britain should just buy used, forever. That way no-one gets 'mugged on depreciation' which is what happens to all the idiots that buy new cars!!!! The fools!!!!

In 20 years time it would be awesome - everyone will have old cars and we can all make do and mend like in Cuba, using washing up liquid for brake fluid and stuff!! Great!

I'm excluded from this, BTW, as I am picking up a brand new £50,000 VW Touareg tomorrow.

98elise

26,743 posts

162 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I could afford it, but I can't justfy the depreciation. I'd rather buy 1 owner 2-3 year old car for half the money.