Audi A4 vs BMW 3 Series Convertible

Audi A4 vs BMW 3 Series Convertible

Author
Discussion

Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
I had to make this decision some years back.
The Audi won.

It has more space in the back seats, it has more space in the boot, especially with the roof down, it just feels nicer to be in.

There's also a personal issue for me that BMW's just feel like company cars to ke, whereas the Audi has a more fun feeling about it.

nct001

733 posts

134 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
ModernAndy said:
The 3.2 was too beefy for the multitronic so not an option but if you do change your mind on the engine, avoid the multitronic like the plague (it's the auto with 7 'gears'), it's absolutely terrible and is the ruin of many an Audi.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/06-06-Audi-A4-Cabriolet-3-2-FSI-Sport-Nav-/151265157550?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item23381b21ae

The 3.2 non Quattro auto is multitronic.

The standard zf gearbox is put in the Quattro cars is to do with the four wheel drive system not working with the cvt multitronic, not the power.

PS had 3.0 Quattro sport manual cab two years ago and it was slow and heavy on fuel and when driven in anger the dmf let go, I'd spend a bit more and get an e90 cab instead, as e46 / a4 are dated now and for £2500 more you will get a car 10 years newer.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
If your kids are anything like my sisters kids, they'll moan after 5 minutes of being in the back of a raggy with the top down at anything over 40mph. It's rather blustery to say the least...!

Jurgen

228 posts

156 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
I've only driven the A4 2.0t convertible with s-tronic gearbox (dsg) and s-line suspension. It looked very nice, especially the interior was very well finished. I suppose it was a good cruiser, but definatly wasn't made to be fun. Very understeery and felt like a heavy barge (which it is I suppose). It was the FWD version, so perhaps the quattro versions are nicer. What did surprise me was the level of scuttle shake on bad roads, especially the shaky steering wheel.

Cupramax

10,482 posts

253 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Jurgen said:
I've only driven the A4 2.0t convertible with s-tronic gearbox (dsg) and s-line suspension.
You haven't, because the A4 cab was never fitted with the DSG box. Fwd autos were all multichronic.

Jurgen

228 posts

156 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Hmm guess I was wrong, seems it was a multitronic (not a multichronic though :P). But still rubbish to drive biggrin Did have paddle gearshift.

Edited by Jurgen on Wednesday 16th April 10:55

jimmyVX

687 posts

208 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Not quite in the same boat but I have just sold my B8 2.0tfsi quattro A4 and swapped for a M135i. The A4 still had elements of under-steer when pushed but in the wet did feel very sure footed. The BMW in comparison is a much nicer drive. The difference in power aside, it just feels better balanced and handling is in a different league.

Definitely drive both, but from a drivers perspective I am sure the BMW will be the one to choose.

junglie

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

218 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
The obvious answer here is it just zip it up and get an E46 M3!

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
IMO BMW simply rules in the 4-seater soft-top stakes. (I'm less convinced by their folding hard-tops.)

No contest.

junglie

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

218 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
I have always been a fan of the E46 and still think it looks fresh many years after its birth.

I have not driven either in convertible form but would just think the Audi would be more refined but am basing that on absolutely no evidence!

Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Without trying to be controversial, I'm wondering how many people have owned or driven either or both.

As a 4 seat cabrio the BMW is horrible.
The rear seats are tiny, the front seats don't slide well for access.
The Audi has much bigger rear seats the front seats have an extra ratchet system to slide right out of the way.

If you are getting a 4 seat cabrio then make sure it's good at being a 4 seat cabrio. smile

I have an A4.
My brother in law used to have the 3 series soft top.

V8forweekends

2,481 posts

125 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
3.2 FSI can be costly if it borks - the timing chains can stretch and cause all sorts of woe.

http://www.audi-sport.net/vb/audi-s4-a4-a4-cab-b7-...

http://www.audi-sport.net/vb/a3-s3-sportback-8p-ch...

Cupramax

10,482 posts

253 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Just for info the A3 3.2 is a totally different engine to the one in the A4.

Agdavie

48 posts

144 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
OK both are great cars but both have downsides...

The Audi would work in all weather and be more reliable (in my opinion) but isnt a good looking and is abit boring to drive...

The BMW looks better and drives great but having had previous issues with a gearbox and electric roof it makes me step away from them to an extent...

If everything is well looked after and its a good car its down to personal preference...

Id go BMW if i knew i was cruising high streets and drifting etc 2 things which i doubt you'll be doing

Id go Audi for the practical side of it as although its a soft top when the winter does hit and every rear drive car is struggling you just take out your cab in the snow on a sunny day with your roof down and go power sliding...




junglie

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

218 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
The only issue I know of the 3.2 FSI engine is the coking problem that can affect some that have not been given a regular 'Italian tune up'. Is there anything else?

slash79

127 posts

125 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
CLK.......... I know it's probably auto only, and not a Beemer or Audi but very classy and the one I would choose (propares for abuse!)

Edited by slash79 on Wednesday 16th April 19:51

V8forweekends

2,481 posts

125 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Cupramax said:
Just for info the A3 3.2 is a totally different engine to the one in the A4.
Every day's a school day - please elaborate.

Mave

8,209 posts

216 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
Without trying to be controversial, I'm wondering how many people have owned or driven either or both.

As a 4 seat cabrio the BMW is horrible.
The rear seats are tiny, the front seats don't slide well for access.
Depends on whether you are using it as an occasional 4 seater or a family car. I can fit in the back of an E46 fairly comfortably with my wife driving (I'm 6'2) and vice versa. Certainly no worse than small hatches we've owned over the years.

V8forweekends

2,481 posts

125 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
junglie said:
The only issue I know of the 3.2 FSI engine is the coking problem that can affect some that have not been given a regular 'Italian tune up'. Is there anything else?

AFAIK, Italian tune up doesn't help - the issue is it's direct injection therefore no fuel in the inlet tracts, however like all modern petrols it does have EGR which directs exhaust gas into the inlet.

They also stretch timing chains.

Mave

8,209 posts

216 months

Wednesday 16th April 2014
quotequote all
Agdavie said:
Id go Audi for the practical side of it as although its a soft top when the winter does hit and every rear drive car is struggling you just take out your cab in the snow on a sunny day with your roof down and go power sliding...
I'd rather power slide the RWD car :-)