RE: BMW 435i M Sport farewell: PH Fleet

RE: BMW 435i M Sport farewell: PH Fleet

Author
Discussion

RemarkLima

2,371 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
Does anyone with a F30 find that it's followed the trend of the E90 in that they feel more built towards a cost?

I had an 330d E46 and that I always felt was built to an engineering standard, and then priced based upon that.

Now in an E91 330d, and personally feel it's been priced first and then engineered to meet (well, return a profit on...) that price.

My gut feeling is that all modern cars are getting capable but numb, due to centralising development costs and parts so it's a one size fits all setup more than before.

ecs0set

2,471 posts

284 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
RemarkLima said:
Does anyone with a F30 find that it's followed the trend of the E90 in that they feel more built towards a cost?

I had an 330d E46 and that I always felt was built to an engineering standard, and then priced based upon that.

Now in an E91 330d, and personally feel it's been priced first and then engineered to meet (well, return a profit on...) that price.

My gut feeling is that all modern cars are getting capable but numb, due to centralising development costs and parts so it's a one size fits all setup more than before.
+100

As a simple example, both E46 and E93 had a button which moved a latch to open the centre console. The F30 has a horrible interference fit. Minor details but clearly a cost saving measure.

Are the interiors any difference between the coupe/cabio (now 4-series) and the saloon/estate (now 3-series)? They seem cheaper on the latter somehow.

Perhaps if they stopped making 100 different variants of 10 different models, they could go back to making 3 models properly?

Raoul Duke

929 posts

163 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
Limpet said:
Clivey said:
My only issue is that despite the recipe looking good on paper, there's a question of it being less of a "driving machine" than BMW's older cars.
As someone who does 20k a year in a bog-standard 320d F30, I can categorically state that, at least without expensive options fitted to it, the F30 isn't anything like the "driving machine" that the E90 was (comparing with similar bog-standard models from that range). It's just like any other modern car. Competent, but completely lacking feel and driver involvement. On non-adaptive suspension, it is quite significantly under-damped as well.

These are details that BMW always used to get right, even on entry level models. I could thoroughly enjoy myself in an E90 318d because the fundamentals were so right. It coped with undulations and camber changes with no fuss at all, and the turn in was always sharp and instantaneous. The F30 is lazier in its responses, softer, more "ordinary" feeling.

Maybe as an M-Sport with the options list lobbed at it the F30 is a different proposition, but why should you need to do this to get the kind of engaging handling that always came as standard on even the poverty models?
Don't want to take this too far off topic, but this is what I also found re the F30. I went to look at the 320d having read lots of reviews suggesting it was the only logical choice in its class, but also found that amongst other things it was surprisingly soft and under damped and came away ultimately disappointed.
Didn't trust my judgement initially given the significant hype about it in the media, so went and gave it another go, still wasn't overly impressed and ended up buying something else.
Unless its specified with adaptive suspension and auto-box ( as a minimum ) then IMHO better choices are available.

Nobby77

36 posts

164 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
I don't suppose it was you guys who followed me through Oxon on my way home a few weeks ago? I was driving my RS6, and a couple of shifty characters in a light blue Beemer followed me nearly to my doorstep so I took a detour..... lol (thought it was a bunch of carjackers!)

GTEYE

2,093 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
Raoul Duke said:
Limpet said:
Clivey said:
My only issue is that despite the recipe looking good on paper, there's a question of it being less of a "driving machine" than BMW's older cars.
As someone who does 20k a year in a bog-standard 320d F30, I can categorically state that, at least without expensive options fitted to it, the F30 isn't anything like the "driving machine" that the E90 was (comparing with similar bog-standard models from that range). It's just like any other modern car. Competent, but completely lacking feel and driver involvement. On non-adaptive suspension, it is quite significantly under-damped as well.

These are details that BMW always used to get right, even on entry level models. I could thoroughly enjoy myself in an E90 318d because the fundamentals were so right. It coped with undulations and camber changes with no fuss at all, and the turn in was always sharp and instantaneous. The F30 is lazier in its responses, softer, more "ordinary" feeling.

Maybe as an M-Sport with the options list lobbed at it the F30 is a different proposition, but why should you need to do this to get the kind of engaging handling that always came as standard on even the poverty models?
Don't want to take this too far off topic, but this is what I also found re the F30. I went to look at the 320d having read lots of reviews suggesting it was the only logical choice in its class, but also found that amongst other things it was surprisingly soft and under damped and came away ultimately disappointed.
Didn't trust my judgement initially given the significant hype about it in the media, so went and gave it another go, still wasn't overly impressed and ended up buying something else.
Unless its specified with adaptive suspension and auto-box ( as a minimum ) then IMHO better choices are available.
I actually have both an F30 320d which is nearing 60k miles as a company hack and my own E92 330d so have some recent experience of both. My observations:

The F30 is certainly the more comfortable motorway car, but slightly softer (even on run flats and 18s) and less driver focused than the E90. It feels much larger than the E92 (which it is). The steering is nowhere near as communicative, much lighter (esp with servotronic) but no feel really at all. The E92 is much heavier, with better feel.

The 8 speed auto in the F30 is excellent, and essential IMHO.

Quality wise the F30 is not as good, and suffers from technology overload, some of which for no real benefit. The bits of the cabin that are slightly out of sight are definitely harder and cheaper than the E92, which in itself was worse than the E46. Reliability has been mediocre with numerous minor failures (horn failed, rear lights detached themselves) all fixed under warranty, but frustrating none the less.

Overall, the F30 is still a great steer, but its certainly less driver focused then its predecessors.


Edited by GTEYE on Wednesday 23 April 15:56


Edited by GTEYE on Wednesday 23 April 15:56

Clivey

Original Poster:

5,110 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
I think I'll stick to my plan of buying the best E46 330Ci Coupé (manual, sport, black/black with HK, Adaptive Xenons, heated seats etc.) I can and keeping hold of it. The added advantage is that the difference between that and a new 4-Series will buy me a TVR. thumbup

Big Tav

645 posts

164 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
God there is some rubbish in this thread. The 4 Series Coupe is brilliant. I think people are forgetting what these cars are meant to be. It's not a track car. It will be on motorways, driven in town and given the odd weekend blast up a back road. The new 4 Series (and 3) are perfect for that.

Some people are never happy. The steering is too numb, ride too soft, 30+ mpg not enough the E90 was much better. bks.

The E90 had too hard suspension for most and the steering had good feel but was too heavy as well.

Most people (who can afford it) will take the new one every time. It is far superior in every way.

Clivey

Original Poster:

5,110 posts

204 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Big Tav said:
(who can afford it)
Not this bcensoredcks again!

Do you have to be able to afford a Mansory Continental GT to earn the right to say they've ruined it by encrusting it with chav tat? Of course not. Besides, many people can afford a new 4-Series nowadays (I await the "finance" BS to start).

As for the E90's steering being heavy; have you got arms made of matchsticks?

Big Tav

645 posts

164 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
In comparison it is. When I go from a F30 to an E90 it just feels old now. Still good but old.

PS I almost can guarantee my arms are bigger than yours mate...

Clivey

Original Poster:

5,110 posts

204 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Big Tav said:
PS I almost can guarantee my arms are bigger than yours mate...
Oh, come on! rofl

My point was that heavy steering is hardly a problem unless you're especially frail. - The only time my fiancee's complained about the relatively heavy steering in our E46 is after her arm & shoulder were injured in an accident. Personally, I much prefer the steering in cars like the E46 3'er and R53 Mini to the newer electrically-assisted systems that have precious little feel.