RE: The four-cylinder Porsche is back!

RE: The four-cylinder Porsche is back!

Author
Discussion

golfdsg

228 posts

127 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
If they decide to put a 4 pot diesel into production, I bet it'll sell in big numbers.

Just look at how the evoque sold with a 4 pot diesel. same story will apply here

otolith

56,026 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
Given what it is and the market it is aimed at, really, who cares what engine it has?

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
Impasse said:
Lotus Evora.

There, said it.
Well it be on to this?

crostonian

2,427 posts

172 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
MJK 24 said:
It'll be relevant in Italy. They tax cars over 2,000cc very heavily. Hence Ferrari developing the 208 Turbo and Lotus developing the 2.0 Turbo GT3.
Ah yes, I'd forgotten Italy's strange tax barrier at two litres. That still exists then?
No, hasn't done for years. Current system is based on power/fuel/emissions category etc, for most prestige/sports cars the starting rate is around £800 per year and any car over 184KW/247bhp has an extra 20 Euros added per KW.

3795mpower

485 posts

130 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
It will sell sh** loads.

How many new 5 series do you see that aren't a 520d ?

They even fit the 520d with twin pipes these days so at a brief glance no one knows.

It's also a cracking 4 pot engine, they've made it for years so I expect it costs 50 quid per unit by now.

No brainer really.

4 cylinders never held the Evoke back, just take a walk around Mayfair !


Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Impasse said:
Lotus Evora.

There, said it.
Well it be on to this?
Nope. 'Twas a cheeky preemptive riposte to the usual Porsche flooding of any Lotus thread.

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
British Beef said:
Would the Jaguar 3lt TD engine fit in the Evoque?
Nope.

juniorbox

82 posts

144 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
I've been thinking about a Macan. No huge disadvantage (for me) in this engine - it'll be a family car not something I want to throw around: 6.9 to 60 is hardly glacial anyway. Specced up with everything I want it's 'only' 46K, which if I kept it for a decade almost makes sense...

Matt UK

17,686 posts

200 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2014
quotequote all
otolith said:
Given what it is and the market it is aimed at, really, who cares what engine it has?
Agreed. It will be precisely the last consideration of most buyers I reckon.

blade7

11,311 posts

216 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
GC8 said:
I have a 237bhp turbocharged I4 Porsche.
237 bhp ?

sfboy

36 posts

124 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Brand dilution seems like the order of the day, 'suppose it saved the brand with the introduction of the Boxster and the Cayman back in the day, but surely a step too far? VW accountant say no.

GC8

19,910 posts

190 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
blade7 said:
GC8 said:
I have a 237bhp turbocharged I4 Porsche.
237 bhp ?
Creative licence.

blade7

11,311 posts

216 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Or a yankee dyno smile.

GC8

19,910 posts

190 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
It has a boost profiler and a wastegate shim, so probably closer to 237bhp than not.

blade7

11,311 posts

216 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
whistle

smilo996

2,780 posts

170 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Interest way for Pistonheads tio cling to its illogical ove of anything Porka. The idea that putting a VW four cylinder in the Macca somehow makes it a real Porsche.

Alternatively you could spin it another way. It is a facelifted Audi Q5, which of course it is. Same floorpan, same gneins and transmission, same electronics and ancillaries.

Porsche the joker in VW's pack of cards, or is that joke.

famfarrow

679 posts

154 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
That is a hateful thing. I dread to think about a 2litre diesel Porsche.

TommyBuoy

1,269 posts

167 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Saw a Macan parked up yesterday - I actually thought it looked ok, and I'm not a Porsche / SUV / crossover fan at all.

I'll never buy one, but many people will.

I don't really care whether Porsche build a four cylinder SUV type thing - and I don't know why anyone would. It means they can raise funds for 911 variants (which I still don't really care about smile )

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
Like the Evoque, lots of people will buy them.
Yes. I continue to be amazed at the enthusisasm of aspirant Brits to spend £40k on SUVs which are almost identical to £30k estate cars. It's a big premium for that "bling".

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
Interest way for Pistonheads tio cling to its illogical ove of anything Porka. The idea that putting a VW four cylinder in the Macca somehow makes it a real Porsche.

Alternatively you could spin it another way. It is a facelifted Audi Q5, which of course it is. Same floorpan, same gneins and transmission, same electronics and ancillaries.

Porsche the joker in VW's pack of cards, or is that joke.
The Cayenne is built in Bratislava by VW, it's even got a VW chassis code. It also looks like a fat, tall 911, where as the Panorama looks the offspring of a 911 and a Maxi.