Badly modified cars thread Mk2

[bobfather]

DannyScene said:

Because I don't like a specific brand of car I'm on the wrong forum? And nope I don't like 'stanced' cars, not sure how you got that from liking one car.

Where did anyone mention "a specific brand of car"? The intention is to suggest that by liking that car which has been modified in a way that has destroyed its drivability implies that you like cars that have been modified in a way that totally destroys their drivability. That certainly means that you are on the wrong forum.

[DannyScene]

bobfather said:

DannyScene said:

Because I don't like a specific brand of car I'm on the wrong forum? And nope I don't like 'stanced' cars, not sure how you got that from liking one car.

Where did anyone mention "a specific brand of car"? The intention is to suggest that by liking that car which has been modified in a way that has destroyed its drivability implies that you like cars that have been modified in a way that totally destroys their drivability. That certainly means that you are on the wrong forum.

I reckon that porsche is on air bags so being low when stood still hasn't effected fk all of its drivability

In fact, from the article 'Mario explained to me that although the car can park and drive quite low, the setup is performance orientated and allows him to still drive the car fast.'

Yeah... Real shame its ruined

Edited by DannyScene on Tuesday 19th May 07:46

[bobfather]

^^ It hasn't added anything to drivability either, lowering all the way to the ground is the main visible mod and so it is apparent that excessive lowering is what makes this car interesting to you.

[xRIEx]

DannyScene said:

bobfather said:

DannyScene said:

Because I don't like a specific brand of car I'm on the wrong forum? And nope I don't like 'stanced' cars, not sure how you got that from liking one car.

Where did anyone mention "a specific brand of car"? The intention is to suggest that by liking that car which has been modified in a way that has destroyed its drivability implies that you like cars that have been modified in a way that totally destroys their drivability. That certainly means that you are on the wrong forum.

I reckon that porsche is on air bags so being low when stood still hasn't effected fk all of its drivability

In fact, from the article 'Mario explained to me that although the car can park and drive quite low, the setup is performance orientated and allows him to still drive the car fast.'

Yeah... Real shame its ruined

Edited by DannyScene on Tuesday 19th May 07:46

Performance-oriented, yeah right! It's pose-oriented whether it can still be driven fast or not.

It's gopping.

[DannyScene]

bobfather said:

^^ It hasn't added anything to drivability either, lowering all the way to the ground is the main visible mod and so it is apparent that excessive lowering is what makes this car interesting to you.

Amazing. How in the world can you possibly know what about a car interests me?

I like the colour, the spoiler, the kit, the headlights, not keen on the wheels and certainly don't like the 'stance'

Now lets try growing up and realising not everyone likes the same thing, PH is very big, its inevitable, just because not everyone conforms with what you like doesn't mean they do not belong on here, how very close minded.

[DannyScene]

xRIEx said:

DannyScene said:

bobfather said:

DannyScene said:

Because I don't like a specific brand of car I'm on the wrong forum? And nope I don't like 'stanced' cars, not sure how you got that from liking one car.

Where did anyone mention "a specific brand of car"? The intention is to suggest that by liking that car which has been modified in a way that has destroyed its drivability implies that you like cars that have been modified in a way that totally destroys their drivability. That certainly means that you are on the wrong forum.

I reckon that porsche is on air bags so being low when stood still hasn't effected fk all of its drivability

In fact, from the article 'Mario explained to me that although the car can park and drive quite low, the setup is performance orientated and allows him to still drive the car fast.'

Yeah... Real shame its ruined

Edited by DannyScene on Tuesday 19th May 07:46

Performance-oriented, yeah right! It's pose-oriented whether it can still be driven fast or not.

It's gopping.

It isn't my car, fking message mario if you have a problem with his words.

[xRIEx]

DannyScene said:

It isn't my car, fking message mario if you have a problem with his words.

You pasted the words on PH; I expressed my opinion of those words on PH. I'm not going to "fking message mario {sic}". Cool your jets, Maverick.

Edited by xRIEx on Tuesday 19th May 10:12

[PorkInsider]

Escort3500 said:

You can always rely on Speedhunters to come up with a horror

Christ! That is vile.

[CoolFool]

DannyScene said:

Because I don't like a specific brand of car I'm on the wrong forum? And nope I don't like 'stanced' cars, not sure how you got that from liking one car.

But why would you like it? It is a ruined car, a ruined Porsche. It does stand out but for all the wrong reasons. I will ask you this question, what would you rather have, a standard Cayman S or a....that thing.

[DannyScene]

CoolFool said:

DannyScene said:

Because I don't like a specific brand of car I'm on the wrong forum? And nope I don't like 'stanced' cars, not sure how you got that from liking one car.

But why would you like it? It is a ruined car, a ruined Porsche. It does stand out but for all the wrong reasons. I will ask you this question, what would you rather have, a standard Cayman S or a....that thing.

I said above why I liked it.

Standard one or the one above is such an easy choice, the one above all day everyday, fit some slightly higher normal suspension first though

[CoolFool]

DannyScene said:

I said above why I liked it.

Standard one or the one above is such an easy choice, the one above all day everyday, fit some slightly higher normal suspension first though

Personally, I prefer the sleeper look. So a standard Cayman with crazy power!

[ManOpener]

I think the Cayman would look pretty decent if it had a sensible static ride height and less stupid (size, design) wheels. It might even look alright with the same design wheels, but in 17". As it stands, it's pretty wrong.

[DaveyBoyWonder]

I love that Nissan Bluebird from a few pages back!

[shakotan]

Hating a vehicle on height adjustable suspension for being 'too low' is akin to throwing away your dinner because it's too hot.

[SonicShadow]

gubbabump said:

dafuq is going on with the photo - looks like there is a ghost or something on the blue door...

Long exposure. The photographer probably used a ND filter.

[PorkInsider]

ManOpener said:

I think the Cayman would look pretty decent if it had a sensible static ride height and less stupid (size, design) wheels. It might even look alright with the same design wheels, but in 17". As it stands, it's pretty wrong.

I think it would actually be ok without the rear spoiler, splitter, side skirts, stupid suspension, silly wheels, yellow headlights and if it had a decent less bile-coloured paint job and a front number plate.

[xRIEx]

SonicShadow said:

gubbabump said:

dafuq is going on with the photo - looks like there is a ghost or something on the blue door...

Long exposure. The photographer probably used a ND filter.

It was probably low light/low ISO for the required aperture; not really any reason for a ND filter - a polarising filter possibly but it doesn't look like one was used (although it depends on its alignment).

[ka90]

[Dave200]

DannyScene said:

Amazing. How in the world can you possibly know what about a car interests me?

Based on 99% of what you post, I'm going to guess at "arguing" or "contrary opinions".

[Mafffew]

Escort3500 said:

You can always rely on Speedhunters to come up with a horror

fking awful. Whoever did that should be shot, several times.