Badly modified cars thread Mk2
Discussion
Dave200 said:
DannyScene said:
Amazing. How in the world can you possibly know what about a car interests me?
Based on 99% of what you post, I'm going to guess at "arguing" or "contrary opinions".I guess my taste in cars is very much a minority on here
Not sure why I always get accused of being a stanced yo fan boy though
DannyScene said:
Dave200 said:
DannyScene said:
Amazing. How in the world can you possibly know what about a car interests me?
Based on 99% of what you post, I'm going to guess at "arguing" or "contrary opinions".I guess my taste in cars is very much a minority on here
Not sure why I always get accused of being a stanced yo fan boy though
DannyScene said:
Nice! One of the best looking porsches I've ever seen,
had something to do with it in this situation.The "Scene" part of your username may also be misleading - although for all I know, it may be nothing to do with cars and it refers to you having dyed black hair with a floppy fringe, stupidly-skintight jeans with a white studded leather belt and a Bring Me The Horizon t-shirt.
xRIEx said:
ad something to do with it in this situation.
The "Scene" part of your username may also be misleading - although for all I know, it may be nothing to do with cars and it refers to you having dyed black hair with a floppy fringe, stupidly-skintight jeans with a white studded leather belt and a Bring Me The Horizon t-shirt.
I did used to have that exact look yes, the scene part of my name is from about 8 years ago and just stuck as my online name for all forums I'm onThe "Scene" part of your username may also be misleading - although for all I know, it may be nothing to do with cars and it refers to you having dyed black hair with a floppy fringe, stupidly-skintight jeans with a white studded leather belt and a Bring Me The Horizon t-shirt.
I wish 'scene' didn't have the association with stance that it does now as everyone assumes I'm into slammed golfs and the like
Hooli said:
ka90 said:
king hell, they look st enough normally. Takes real effort to make them worse.Personally the colour, wheel combination and subtle mirror change inspired by a Beetle design looks fine to me (awaits the "you're on the wrong forum" b
ks to start....) 
xRIEx said:
It was probably low light/low ISO for the required aperture; not really any reason for a ND filter - a polarising filter possibly but it doesn't look like one was used (although it depends on its alignment).
The light levels don't look that low, and it was taken during the day. There's only so much you can do with a low ISO and relatively high (small) aperture. Also, excessively high apertures can reduce sharpness due to diffraction. In this particular photo, you can see some blurring from DoF in front and behind the car which means a high aperture was not used. It's actually very common to use an ND filter for photography at car shows with a long exposure time.ZiggyNiva said:
Lovely......said no one......ever......aka_kerrly said:
Hooli said:
ka90 said:
king hell, they look st enough normally. Takes real effort to make them worse.Personally the colour, wheel combination and subtle mirror change inspired by a Beetle design looks fine to me (awaits the "you're on the wrong forum" b
ks to start....) SonicShadow said:
xRIEx said:
It was probably low light/low ISO for the required aperture; not really any reason for a ND filter - a polarising filter possibly but it doesn't look like one was used (although it depends on its alignment).
The light levels don't look that low, and it was taken during the day. There's only so much you can do with a low ISO and relatively high (small) aperture. Also, excessively high apertures can reduce sharpness due to diffraction. In this particular photo, you can see some blurring from DoF in front and behind the car which means a high aperture was not used. It's actually very common to use an ND filter for photography at car shows with a long exposure time.Approximate exposure of an object in direct sunlight at f/16 is 1/ISO, and that is definitely not direct sunlight.
If an ND filter was used, it's a pointless endeavour with animated objects in the shot; they'd get better results with a circular polariser and then at least it would remove the skylight reflections from the car bodywork. A graduated ND is great for landscapes or other wildly varying stops of light, a flat ND even when you've really got to get a dreamy long exposure waterfall, but for a static shot? Whack the shutter speed up.
AstonZagato said:
I just got told that was a REALLY cool car...by my 4yr old....
Not posted in this thread before but can't think of anywhere better suited for this horror.
http://www.angliacarauctions.co.uk/media/19979/3.j...
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff