Badly modified cars thread Mk2

Badly modified cars thread Mk2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

DanielSan

18,799 posts

167 months

Saturday 18th February 2017
quotequote all
Clubman270 said:
Another vote for wrong thread, that's awesome.

Cookeh

247 posts

88 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
essdaytwelve said:
Takes all sorts I suppose, vomit
The world would be a very boring place indeed if we were all sheep, doing and liking exactly what we're told to.

Du1point8

21,608 posts

192 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
Clubman270 said:
Another vote for wrong thread, that's awesome.
If it was a new 911, then hell yes, but as an old 911, Im a bit unsure.

irocfan

40,471 posts

190 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

214 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
Clubman270 said:
That is a proper toy car piece of hot rodding. I almost actually like it, but if you look at the roof line at the back: something isn't right with the way that they have chopped it. Ergo - even for people who fundamentally like it you can still argue that it still belongs in the thread... wink

(They have been lazy leaving the rear wheel arches hidden behind those huge wheels too - for a top job they should surely have done something with those as well).


Edited by DiscoColin on Sunday 19th February 13:19

Captain Smerc

3,021 posts

116 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
irocfan said:
The arch covers the fuel cap confused

rohrl

8,738 posts

145 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all

DocJock

8,357 posts

240 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
vomit

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

163 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
I've seen that ^^^ recently in other threads but what is underneath ?

It could be a Fiat....confused

shakotan

10,703 posts

196 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
lucido grigio said:
I've seen that ^^^ recently in other threads but what is underneath ?

It could be a Fiat....confused
No, its a real Viper.

TheDrBrian

5,444 posts

222 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Why?

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

163 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
shakotan said:
No, its a real Viper.
Oh ,that makes me look foolish ,I thought it was a bolt on panel job.

Makes it even worse.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
shakotan said:
lucido grigio said:
I've seen that ^^^ recently in other threads but what is underneath ?

It could be a Fiat....confused
No, its a real Viper.
Dodge being owned by ...

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

214 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
shakotan said:
lucido grigio said:
I've seen that ^^^ recently in other threads but what is underneath ?

It could be a Fiat....confused
No, its a real Viper.
Dodge being owned by ...
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, however the final version of the Viper entered production before 2014 so none of them could claim Fiat ancestry. Indeed, the Italian connection to the Viper is actually that Lamborghini (the arch enemy of Fiat affiliate Ferrari) developed the original engine. So the point is somewhat flawed don't you think... ?

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
DiscoColin said:
xRIEx said:
shakotan said:
lucido grigio said:
I've seen that ^^^ recently in other threads but what is underneath ?

It could be a Fiat....confused
No, its a real Viper.
Dodge being owned by ...
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, however the final version of the Viper entered production before 2014 so none of them could claim Fiat ancestry. Indeed, the Italian connection to the Viper is actually that Lamborghini (the arch enemy of Fiat affiliate Ferrari) developed the original engine. So the point is somewhat flawed don't you think... ?
It's OK, I think some of the kittens survi- ah no, wait, they're all dead.

problemchild1976

1,376 posts

149 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
rohrl said:
PoleDriver said:
That is not badly modified!?
Tasteless, maybe, but it looks done to a high standard!
Would people please STOP posting this?

This thread is for cars which are badly modified either in quality or because their modifications have made them look st, like the Merc pictured.

As an example this Mansory is very expensive car and has been very expensively modified to very high standard but it is still badly modified because the end result is that it looks terrible.
no - thats the point of the thread ..... some people think its bad, some people dont!!

you can't tell people to not say "i actually like it"

a forum is for discussion

i personally think badly modified (as per the title) is totally different from tasteless modifications

JJ

AstonZagato

12,704 posts

210 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
spookly said:
Escort3500 said:
I like.
All it needs is a supercharged LS3 engine. 500bhp+. And it would then be perfect. I really like it for its stness.

http://barnfinds.com/chia-pet-bug-vw-beetle-porsch...

ambuletz

10,744 posts

181 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
What's this one about?

AT link



It's got john cooper sticker on the rear quarter when it's a normal cooper!!

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
ambuletz said:
What's this one about?

AT link



It's got john cooper sticker on the rear quarter when it's a normal cooper!!
Really? It's just a stock Mini with a small sticker!

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

163 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
Why not ?

Mr Cooper is the "daddy" of all Coopers ,not just the JCW types ,a couple of stickers hardly qualifies

as badly modded.....wobble
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED