Z4 3.0L or Boxter 3.2 S ???!

Z4 3.0L or Boxter 3.2 S ???!

Author
Discussion

Jez m

Original Poster:

813 posts

195 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Hello, So after running around in a 323i for 10 months after selling my 450hp Nissan it is time to get something a bit more 'fun' again! Sorry Auto BM, you are 'fun' and oh so reliable, but you always knew it was going to be a short term affair.. 'SOTW here you come!' biggrin

Narrowed down my choices to the 2 cars in the title. Had looked at S2000's as well but they just don't do it for me like these two!

- upto 6k budget
- 2 seater
- Fun and fast
- As much power as possible! biggrin
- Reliable (ish)
- Holds it value (will prob sell after 12 months)

At the moment, the BM is winning for me. I can get a newer car (03-05 as opposed to 99-01 for the Boxster) for the money and i really like the looks, the build quality and interior is lovely, so much more modern feeling than the Porsche interior! This car will primarily be a weekend fun car but also my daily commuter (all of 8 miles!) so needs to be reliable. I know the Boxster has more power but if im honest, i am a little bit scared of it going wrong and ending up with a money pit! With the BM, i know the engine is a lot more reliable and less 'needy' than the Porsche boxedin

Have looked at a couple of each but not driven either yet, so keen to hear peoples opinions! Ta!

Ideal Boxter: http://goo.gl/EFEHHJ VS. Ideal BM: http://goo.gl/Czbb2G



J4CKO

41,585 posts

200 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
350Z ?

Jez m

Original Poster:

813 posts

195 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
350Z ?
Having owned a 200sx for 13 years and being a big fan of fast Nissan's this was my first thought, however i just don't like them that much! Oh and i really fancy a convertible too.. which are a little out of budget for 350's.

arcticfire

1,827 posts

119 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
They both seem to come with a rake of problems and as much as I'm not a fan of Honest John, it's probably still worth looking into some of the issues:

http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/bmw/z4-2003/?...
http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/porsche/boxst...

Compared to: http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/carbycar/honda/s2000-1...

How about old school: http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2014...

Or: http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2014...

There's also the 9-3 Convertible 2.8T - bags of torque and pre 2006 will be cheaper tax.

kambites

67,578 posts

221 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Out of those two I'd take the Porsche - it's faster, has infinitely better steering, a better ride, a better balanced chassis, better brakes and just generally feels much more special to drive.

If it was the Z4M you were considering, it'd be a bit more of a competition. I'd still take the Boxster but because I prefer it rather than because I think it's objectively better than the M.


In my case, in roughly the same position as you (but with a slightly higher budget) after test driving loads of cars), I ended up buying an Elise and haven't regretted it for a moment. You wont get an Elise for 6k, but you might get a VX220? smile

Edited by kambites on Friday 6th June 11:34

Tje

194 posts

120 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
I was considering both of those options.

I was leaning more towards the Porsche from the test drive. But I have a 20 mile commute each way each day so head was favouring the bm.

I ended up being sensible and get a subaru impreza. Test drove it and just loved the drive


lewisf182

2,089 posts

188 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Z4 3.0 for me.

They are a solid car... Only real issues are snapped rear springs (cheap to fix) and the electric roof motor (getting cheaper to fix). Great sound, WAY more modern looking than the Boxster, good MPG (for what is is), as fast as you'll ever need etc.

If we were talking £10-£12k I'd pick the Boxster, but at £6k I'd rather take an 03/04 over a 99/01.

Jez m

Original Poster:

813 posts

195 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Yeah, see the Honestjohn link on the Boxster just puts me off it even more! That engine worries me! The BM is simple / reliable, engine in the front (you can get at), tough gearbox and RWD ( all be it missing an LSD).
I am sure when i drive both i will love the Porsche more but i know everytime i drive it hard i will be worrying about it going t**s up! Been there with my 200sx many a time! biggrin

Like the White 350 in the link above.. Shame its not a drop top!

If the Z4M was in budget... this thread wouldn't have started and i would be driving one now! biggrin LOVE them! (Maybe next year!)

Bennet

2,122 posts

131 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
What do you really want from this car?

We just bought a Z4 for my wife. It's a nice place to be with the roof down, and it feels like a quality item. You feel kind of cool in it.

It also lacks driver involvement. The steering is numb, there is too much travel in the clutch and accelerator, the gearbox is very notchy, you can't see out of it that well and it rides far harder than there is any justification for. I have a mk1 mr2 which is twice as satisfying to drive.

It doesn't give you that confident, agile, "one with the machine" thing that you really want it to. You never quite feel in full control.

A decent cruiser, but one with a pointlessly hard ride.

All the reviews seem to love it though.

PS - Absolutely excellent turning circle.

buzzer

3,543 posts

240 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Never seen my mate cry.... until he bought a Boxter. ( well there were real tears in his eyes when he took the call from the garage...)

the bills were
just... yikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikesyikes

kambites

67,578 posts

221 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Does the 3.0 in the Z4 suffer from VANOS failures?

BRMMA

1,846 posts

172 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
I've owned a 986 S and Z4 3.0si

the Z4 will definitely cost you less to run and will frustrate less for doing more mundane duties, however for driving hard the Boxster is by far the better car

Riknos

4,700 posts

204 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Did you drive the S2000? Because I was after similar cars to yourself, until I drove the S2000... then looked at all the bills for the Z4 and Boxster, and decided I wanted money in my pocket and bought the s2k. Honda come top of all the reliability tables for good reason and the s2k is no exception...

Jez m

Original Poster:

813 posts

195 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Bennet said:
What do you really want from this car?

We just bought a Z4 for my wife. It's a nice place to be with the roof down, and it feels like a quality item. You feel kind of cool in it.

It also lacks driver involvement. The steering is numb, there is too much travel in the clutch and accelerator, the gearbox is very notchy, you can't see out of it that well and it rides far harder than there is any justification for. I have a mk1 mr2 which is twice as satisfying to drive.

It doesn't give you that confident, agile, "one with the machine" thing that you really want it to. You never quite feel in full control.

A decent cruiser, but one with a pointlessly hard ride.

All the reviews seem to love it though.

PS - Absolutely excellent turning circle.
I need this car to be reliable as well as fun. If it was fun (heart) first then the Boxter would be top of the list.
SO the Z4 kind of sits nicely in-between both, hence why it is currently top of the list. The fact remains that i am yet to drive them so i may end up hating them both! laugh

Hard ride doesnt bother me. Used to that from my old 200sx on coilovers. I know what you mean RE: accelerator pedal, i think most BM's suffer from this.

I have been a passenger in an S2K but not driven one. I know the engine is great.. im just not a 4 cylinder fan! Plus i like torque! smile

PHmember

2,487 posts

171 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
BRMMA said:
I've owned a 986 S and Z4 3.0si

the Z4 will definitely cost you less to run and will frustrate less for doing more mundane duties, however for driving hard the Boxster is by far the better car
Exactly this. I've just changed from 986S (3.2l) to a Z4 coupe (3.0l).

Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the Z4, it's really grown on me. Faster in a straight line than my Boxster, but the Boxster is in a different league in the corners.

I feel no regret at selling the Porsche, but I'd also gladly have one again.

mrdanbartlett

702 posts

217 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
I've my my Z4 3.0 5 years, superb car, still feels fairly modern/solid and looks more than it's worth. Boxster was a more fluid and involving drive but the Z4 has less issues, costs less to run, and interior is way better. Also it sounds awesome when you take the soundfoam out (1min job).

Change the runflats for normal tyres for a better ride. Mines got the dreaded roof problem, and Ive had 2 cracked springs. Great car.

Jez m

Original Poster:

813 posts

195 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
Good stuff guys.. last 2 posts making me more Pro Z4! biggrin
Id already read about the sound mod. One of the first things on the list to do!

Found a local car for both Bm and Porker. Not one's id choose to buy, but should give me a good feel for them driving wise.

edc

9,235 posts

251 months

Friday 6th June 2014
quotequote all
I'm on my 2nd Boxster now. Both in my profile. Just feels a bit more special than the BMW.

Jez m

Original Poster:

813 posts

195 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
edc said:
I'm on my 2nd Boxster now. Both in my profile. Just feels a bit more special than the BMW.
They are both stunning! smile

Fox-

13,238 posts

246 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
The Boxster is the better car. The Z4 is the better £6k car. Terrible steering aside, the Z4 is hardly a bad sports car to be fair.