RE: Suzuki Swift Sport: Review

RE: Suzuki Swift Sport: Review

Monday 9th June 2014

Suzuki Swift Sport: Review

They don't make hot hatches like they used to? Actually Suzuki still does



We can be guilty here on PH of moaning a bit about how things ain't what they used to be. Cars have got too complex, too expensive, not involving enough, too heavy, the performance is impressive but irrelevant to what you can actually enjoy on the road and so it goes.

In an age of bells and whistles Swift looks subtle
In an age of bells and whistles Swift looks subtle
What a blessed relief it is to get in a car like the second-gen Suzuki Swift Sport then. Because things, it seems, ARE what they used to be. The Sport weighs a little over a tonne, has a normally aspirated engine that seems to relish having the nuts revved off it to make meaningful progress, a short-geared six-speed manual transmission, doesn't use much fuel and has been set up by people who aren't scared of engineering in traditional hot hatch traits like throttle adjustability.

Price as tested
The Swift Sport basically is an old-school hot hatch then, just one that also comes with modern creature comforts like 'safety'. Decent headlights. A basic but usable touchscreen nav system and DAB radio - the latter a recent addition to the standard spec along with a five-door option last year. It's a refreshing car because it seems to have absolutely no pretentions whatsoever - there's no contrived retro posturing like a Mini or Fiat 500, it doesn't do anything whatsoever to stand out from the crowd and just cracks on with providing amusing transportation at a reasonable price. A point hammered home by the spec sheet for our test car. Basic RRP? £14,499. Price as tested? £14,499. In an age where the typical press car flatters to deceive with a plus-20 per cent options garnish that's a nice number to see on the bottom line.

Nice skinny wheel, manual shift, decent kit...
Nice skinny wheel, manual shift, decent kit...
The fact that the styling, such that it is, seems influenced by Boba Fett's body armour doesn't do any harm either.

The modern trimmings on the Swift make day to day life with it that bit more pleasant but at heart this is a proper old school fast hatch. Is it actually hot or just pleasantly warm? Given 200hp seems expected for true bragging rights these days it's probably just the latter but in traditional terms 136hp is more than a 205 GTI had and enough to be going on with if driving enjoyment is about more than 0-62 times. Which of course it is. Closest new-school rival to the Swift would be the recently Ecoboosted and turbocharged Fiesta Zetec S, now packing a 1.0-litre 125hp/147lb ft three-cylinder engine with claimed 65.7 combined mpg potential but more expensive with a £14,995 starting price, not as fast by the numbers and only available as a three-door and with a five-speed manual.

Spec sheet warriors won't get it - their loss
Spec sheet warriors won't get it - their loss
The way we used to live
Back to the Swift then. It's traditionally Japanese in the way the doors clang and the plastics feel a bit cheap in places but also in the way the six-speed gearbox slots in positively and quickly and the slim-rimmed steering wheel chatters away in your hands. The assistance is a little synthetic but the weighting is good, turn-in positive and trustworthy and, like everything else, there's just a pleasing sense of balance to all the control weights and responses. The M16A 1.6-litre engine stands out in this day and age for its lack of forced induction and need for 4,400rpm to get maximum torque rather than the thousand-odd of most modern turbo engines. The undersquare layout (78x83mm bore and stroke) and internal inertia seems to rob it of that last percentage of zinginess you might hope for when coming on and off the throttle but Japanese engines have a habit of loosening up with a few miles so we'll hold out hope for that happening in this case too.

Good honest fun at a good honest price
Good honest fun at a good honest price
Special praise must go to the ride too, which proves that a 'sporty' set up (the Sport gets beefed up bushings, bigger wheel bearings, increased spring rates and 'rebound springs' on the front struts) needn't come at the price of comfort. Sure, it's firm but there's a pleasing level of compliance in the initial suspension stroke that's matched with an equal level of composure further into its travel and as the loads increase. There's nothing fancy going on here beyond decent tuning; the fact that with the ESP off Suzuki is willing to let the Swift feel safely and predictably throttle adjustable is also highly commendable. It's even pretty refined and smooth on the motorway, though the squishy seats lack a little support on longer journeys.

So, no, things ain't what they used to be. Sometimes they're actually better.


SUZUKI SWIFT SPORT FIVE-DOOR
Engine:
1,586cc 4-cyl
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 136@6,900rpm
Torque (lb ft): 118@4,400rpm
0-62mph: 8.7sec
Top speed: 121mph
Weight: 1,045kg
MPG: 44.1mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 147g/km
Price: £14,499 (as tested, three-door £13,999)

Author
Discussion

323ti

Original Poster:

128 posts

122 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
Now available with 5 doors? I'm going to ring the missus and TRY to pry her out of her Chelsea Tractor.

W124

1,541 posts

139 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
Absolutely brilliant cars. Linear is the word I'd pick to describe them.

XJR500bhp

1,194 posts

211 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
I've hired the race prepped ones from Dale @ the ring, and they are awesome fun

Dr G

15,195 posts

243 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
I've always liked these little things; the earlier ones look like great value now.

Are they reliable?

LuS1fer

41,137 posts

246 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
Looks great. As for interiors, I recently sat in a BMW i3 and that's as cheap and nasty as it gets at £25k with grant.

LotusOmega375D

7,636 posts

154 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
This is exactly what my missus should be driving, but 15k for something slower, uglier and less powerful than a near 30 year-old 1.9 205 GTi? No thanks.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

149 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
This is exactly what my missus should be driving, but 15k for something slower, uglier and less powerful than a near 30 year-old 1.9 205 GTi? No thanks.
How is it less powerful? Surely the 1.9gti had 126bhp or so and last time I checked 130+ was more than 120+

Funnily enough in the MINI thread Ive brought this up as an example of an old school hatch.

Veeayt

3,139 posts

206 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
Dr G said:
I've always liked these little things; the earlier ones look like great value now.

Are they reliable?
The first gen was very reliable. The engine by modern standards is quite understressed. After all, they are Toyotas, which gives them a certain credit on reliability.

Big Tav

645 posts

165 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
+1 When renting from the Ring! Perfect for it!

kambites

67,584 posts

222 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
Nice to see someone still making my sort of hot hatch. smile

JonRB

74,597 posts

273 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
I have the Mk1 Suzuki Swift Sport and it's an absolute hoot of a car. Only thing I'd change is maybe a little bit more power and the 6-speed box, both of which the Mk2 has.

I do think the styling of the Mk2 is a little more fussy and awkward than the Mk1 though.

LotusOmega375D

7,636 posts

154 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
How is it less powerful? Surely the 1.9gti had 126bhp or so and last time I checked 130+ was more than 120+

Funnily enough in the MINI thread Ive brought this up as an example of an old school hatch.
My Bad. I thought the 1.9 was 140bhp. Anyway, still quicker off the mark, so negative progress in my eyes.

JonRB

74,597 posts

273 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
My Bad. I thought the 1.9 was 140bhp. Anyway, still quicker off the mark, so negative progress in my eyes.
I don't think you're comparing like with like though. The 1.9 was one of the fastest hot hatches around, so you should be comparing it to something like an Astra VXR rather than the Suzuki Swift Sport. The Swift is unashamedly a warm hatch rather than a hot hatch. It's never claimed to be a hot hatch.

Dr G said:
I've always liked these little things; the earlier ones look like great value now.

Are they reliable?
Extremely reliable. I haven't needed to spend a penny on mine in the 11 months I've had it. It hasn't even used any oil.

kambites

67,584 posts

222 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
My Bad. I thought the 1.9 was 140bhp. Anyway, still quicker off the mark, so negative progress in my eyes.
The 205 was also about 50% more expensive, inflation adjusted.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

149 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
JonRB said:
LotusOmega375D said:
My Bad. I thought the 1.9 was 140bhp. Anyway, still quicker off the mark, so negative progress in my eyes.
I don't think you're comparing like with like though. The 1.9 was one of the fastest hot hatches around, so you should be comparing it to something like an Astra VXR rather than the Suzuki Swift Sport. The Swift is unashamedly a warm hatch rather than a hot hatch. It's never claimed to be a hot hatch.

Dr G said:
I've always liked these little things; the earlier ones look like great value now.

Are they reliable?
Extremely reliable. I haven't needed to spend a penny on mine in the 11 months I've had it. It hasn't even used any oil.
Yeah it would be on terms nowadays with a Mini JCW or ST Mountune.

RenesisEvo

3,613 posts

220 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
How do these fair on the motorway? Revs in 6th at 70mph anyone? Not too noisy/uncomfortable for long trips?

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

169 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
How do these fair on the motorway? Revs in 6th at 70mph anyone? Not too noisy/uncomfortable for long trips?
Forgive me, didn't note down the cruising revs but it seemed typically low geared. Fine on the motorway though, engine quiet at speed, lovely 'float' to the ride and decently refined too. Only those squashy seats spoiled it on a run but other than that surprisingly refined.

Cheers,

Dan

angelicupstarts

257 posts

132 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
would try one ,
As took the wife's Audi tt out for a blast at weekend ...dont really drive it as it leaves me cold .
its fast , competent , does almost everything perfectly ....but just dosnt feel special ...no buzz from driving it .
took a friends pug 205 gti for a spin a month ago ...slower , less everything in every way .....but somehow it comes out on top for me ...
if this swift was a nimble little hatch without all the extras one dosnt want or need ..sounds good to me

BILL PAYER

526 posts

180 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
How do these fair on the motorway? Revs in 6th at 70mph anyone? Not too noisy/uncomfortable for long trips?
My MK1 sounds more like a motorcycle at motorway speed but now they have fitted a six speed this may have changed

mutsy88

79 posts

142 months

Monday 9th June 2014
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
How do these fair on the motorway? Revs in 6th at 70mph anyone? Not too noisy/uncomfortable for long trips?
I do 25 to 30k miles a year in my mk1 and its ok, depends what your used to I guess. Its a small car at the end of the day so not the ideal motorway cruiser but makes up for it around town and on nice B-roads.

Not sure on revs at 70 in the new ones as they have an extra gear - which is needed as my mk1 is at just under 4k at 70mph.