RE: Megane Renaultsport 275 Trophy-R

RE: Megane Renaultsport 275 Trophy-R

Author
Discussion

MustardCutter

238 posts

120 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
I'm more interested in what the non-r would do with the same tyres as the leon.

If anything this goes to show that you can spend thousands on upgrading your car but it's only worth a few seconds over a long lap of a tough circuit, or that you're wasting your time unless you up the power.

But actually I'm more interested in what Honda will do with the civic type-r...

Edited by MustardCutter on Monday 16th June 10:05

EricE

1,945 posts

129 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Yes the price is high but at least you can buy one. Nice car.

vtecyo

2,122 posts

129 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Am I massively out of touch with car prices now or something? £47k on a Golf seems a little ridiculous when you consider the nearly new / ex demo market at that price includes things like the C63 AMG and the Jaguar XKR..

EricE

1,945 posts

129 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
Am I massively out of touch with car prices now or something?
No, I like to think that car prices are massively out of touch with us cash buyers. I reckon 90% of all Golf Rs are financed.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

148 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
CraigyMc said:
Am I massively out of touch with car prices now or something? £47k on a Golf seems a little ridiculous when you consider the nearly new / ex demo market at that price includes things like the C63 AMG and the Jaguar XKR..
Yes but then a nearly new or ex demo Golf R would be a lot less.

Just wait to see how much the Trophy's loose in deprecation.

Reavenger

129 posts

133 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Does the 275 Trophy come with the Recaro seats, visibility pack etc or are they cost options also?

Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Fetchez la vache said:
Maybe o/t but

Seat's 7min 54.3sec
Ren's 7min 58.4sec

Have Renault smashed the record, or simply beaten it by 4 seconds? I guess 4 seconds at this level *is* smashing?
Erm. Did you get those the wrong way round chap?
Yes, I think I possibly did smile

Hoygo 2

46 posts

124 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Amazing 8,54 is faster than most supercars 20 years ago and fastest sports cars 10 years ago, don't think any road legal fwd car can beat this now,

RenaultSport have made the 'ring like its home ,seems like any car that beats them they get their record easily again.


WCZ

10,529 posts

194 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
anyone here ordering one?

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Yes please.

Liquid yellow, please.

chris285

811 posts

132 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
So 4 seconds is smashing it in a car with no rear seats and costing 36k, well played Renault on the big margin on the lap times for that much more and not as practical. Granted the Leon had been tweaked as well but still had all it's seats in, i'd be looking at doing a stripped version of it and sending it back again if I worked for them to just annoy Renaults parade

jonjay

65 posts

217 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Well done Renault....for building a race car.

I find it really really funny that everyone is so happy that Renault broke SEATs record. I was expecting the reaction to be negative because Renault have gone mental just to beat an amazing time set by SEAT and cost 8k more in the process. It just shows how good the SEAT Leon Cupra is and how much you have to modify a Megane to get anywhere near.

Everyone was complaining [including pistonheads] that SEAT used uprated brakes, removed aircon, lighter wheels and nicer tyres. Now Renault basically strip the car, uprated suspension, exhaust, remap, wheels, tyres, seats and everyone is cool with that?

Smells of badge snobbery to me.


vrooom

3,763 posts

267 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
1280kg ? still heavy even stripped out...

CraigyMc

16,409 posts

236 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
CraigyMc said:
Am I massively out of touch with car prices now or something? £47k on a Golf seems a little ridiculous when you consider the nearly new / ex demo market at that price includes things like the C63 AMG and the Jaguar XKR..
My take is that:
  • The prices are ridiculous, and
  • You are a little out of touch
It's partially a function of small hatchbacks being engineered more like larger cars.
Years ago, 4wd would have been the preserve of super-saloons, as would most of the options I ticked to get that Golf up to more than £47K, if they were available at all - DSG gearboxes aren't cheap, just under £3K on sat-nav isn't cheap, £1K on fancy-dan rheo dampers isn't cheap. This stuff adds up and wasn't available before.

On the other hand, the base price of the Golf R is still just about £30K, so it's not all options - some of it is just that the base cars themselves are more expensive.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

148 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
jonjay said:
Well done Renault....for building a race car.

I find it really really funny that everyone is so happy that Renault broke SEATs record. I was expecting the reaction to be negative because Renault have gone mental just to beat an amazing time set by SEAT and cost 8k more in the process. It just shows how good the SEAT Leon Cupra is and how much you have to modify a Megane to get anywhere near.

Everyone was complaining [including pistonheads] that SEAT used uprated brakes, removed aircon, lighter wheels and nicer tyres. Now Renault basically strip the car, uprated suspension, exhaust, remap, wheels, tyres, seats and everyone is cool with that?

Smells of badge snobbery to me.
The difference is that Renault say they have removed option A and B and fitted C and D to do the record. SEAT removed the AC (which weighs a lot and causes drag on the engine) and fitted bits not actually available on the car.

Regardless of a 'performance Pack' coming out in the future they fudged the numbers. Whos to say the engine didnt have an 'optimised' map aswell. Hey the Renault might have done.

This is the issue with these comparisons and the manufacturers have to come across as infallible to be seen a credible. SEAT failed.

I agree though this time as per my last post is slightly hollow. I want to know what a standard Trophy with the options ticked can do. That's a genuine comparison.

monthefish

20,443 posts

231 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all

framerateuk

2,733 posts

184 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
jonjay said:
Well done Renault....for building a race car.

I find it really really funny that everyone is so happy that Renault broke SEATs record. I was expecting the reaction to be negative because Renault have gone mental just to beat an amazing time set by SEAT and cost 8k more in the process. It just shows how good the SEAT Leon Cupra is and how much you have to modify a Megane to get anywhere near.

Everyone was complaining [including pistonheads] that SEAT used uprated brakes, removed aircon, lighter wheels and nicer tyres. Now Renault basically strip the car, uprated suspension, exhaust, remap, wheels, tyres, seats and everyone is cool with that?

Smells of badge snobbery to me.
I think the main complaint was that those removals and add-ons on the Seat weren't available on the production car.

Props to Renault for making an R26.R successor. Though I have to say, for a dedicated track car, I'd rather something much lighter, and in this price range there's quite a lot of competition.

CamMoreRon

1,237 posts

125 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
chris285 said:
So 4 seconds is smashing it in a car with no rear seats and costing 36k, well played Renault on the big margin on the lap times for that much more and not as practical. Granted the Leon had been tweaked as well but still had all it's seats in, i'd be looking at doing a stripped version of it and sending it back again if I worked for them to just annoy Renaults parade
I don't think you appreciate just how difficult it is to take 4 seconds out when you're up at this sort of level.

Chapppers

4,483 posts

191 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
monthefish said:
Teleportation.

"My car can go 14 miles in 7m30s" "lol, why?"

EricE

1,945 posts

129 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
It just occurred to me that this is only 2 seconds slower than the new M3. Wow...