This drives me mad

Author
Discussion

TheInsanity1234

Original Poster:

740 posts

119 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
this drives me mad.

Don't these people realise that anybody who has killed a cyclist or someone by accident on the roads will have to live with that on their conscience for the rest of their lives?

Putting them in prison won't change their driving. Removing their licence won't change their driving. Giving them a fine and a few points won't change their driving.

What will change their driving, is the fact they are going to constantly think about the fact they've killed someone. The fact they've destroyed the lives of the person's family. The fact they've made a mistake that quite a few other people will routinely make, but they're unfortunate enough to end up killing someone as a result.

These people are going to need support and consolation, not punishing.

Does nobody understand that?

grayze

790 posts

168 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Putting them in prison will change their driving, they wont be driving.

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
grayze said:
Putting them in prison will change their driving, they wont be driving.
As indeed will removing their licence - and if they drive even then perhaps prison was the right idea after all.

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Is it talking about the people who are convicted of killing a cyclist through dangerous driving, or all people who hit cyclists and kill them? Because many of the latter are probably innocent of any crime.

Causing death by dangerous driving should almost always carry a custodial sentence, IMO, but I'm not sure that's what this article is about.

jimbop1

2,441 posts

204 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
But I think the point is.. Is prison necessary for making a split second mistake or is it enough that the person will have to live with the guilt for the rest of their lives enough?

As discussed on another thread the car driver may not always be 100% at fault.

John D.

17,845 posts

209 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
doogz said:
Oh right. I see.

So people should be able to drive like complete cocks, and when they kill someone, they'll get away with it, no repurcussions whatsoever, because now they have to live with it.

Sounds fair.
Seems to be the general jist of it hehe

Perhaps OP wouldn't get so mad if they thought a bit harder about the whole situation.

jimbop1

2,441 posts

204 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
Is it talking about the people who are convicted of killing a cyclist through dangerous driving, or all people who hit cyclists and kill them? Because many of the latter are probably innocent of any crime.

Causing death by dangerous driving should almost always carry a custodial sentence, IMO, but I'm not sure that's what this article is about.
Also this.

skoff

1,387 posts

234 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
The punishments dished out are supposed to be a deterrent to other drivers rather than a remedy for the driving habits of a driver that has already killed a cyclist.

Trouble is, deterrence only works if people identify that they are a danger in the first place, otherwise the belief is likely to be 'it'll never happen to me'. I doubt that many drivers go out of a morning with the intention of killing a cyclist.

The only answer is better driver training. I'd like every driver to have to go out on a bicycle for a week to learn first hand how vulnerable cyclists are on the roads.

jimbop1

2,441 posts

204 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
With added training for cyclists too?

John D.

17,845 posts

209 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
jimbop1 said:
With added training for cyclists too?
Bit late for that.

skoff

1,387 posts

234 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
jimbop1 said:
With added training for cyclists too?
No objections from me on that front either... I think there are bad cyclists and bad drivers on the roads.

Bradley1500

766 posts

146 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
It should be handled on a case by case basis.

I remember watching a Police, Camera, Action type program where a young women hit a cyclist on an unlit A road. The cyclist was in dark clothing with no reflectives or lights. The women thought she had hit an animal or similar so didn't stop, it was only when her father saw the damage and thought it would be a good idea to report the incident to the Police they found out she had hit and killed the cyclist. A very sad mistake but one which could of been avoided if the cyclist had taken the appropriate precautions to make himself visible!

jimbop1

2,441 posts

204 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Bradley1500 said:
It should be handled on a case by case basis.

I remember watching a Police, Camera, Action type program where a young women hit a cyclist on an unlit A road. The cyclist was in dark clothing with no reflectives or lights. The women thought she had hit an animal or similar so didn't stop, it was only when her father saw the damage and thought it would be a good idea to report the incident to the Police they found out she had hit and killed the cyclist. A very sad mistake but one which could of been avoided if the cyclist had taken the appropriate precautions to make himself visible!
I remember that as well. Good example!

Surely no one would think that she should have gone to prison purely to deter others?

danjama

5,728 posts

142 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
I commute by cycle to work most days. 8 mile journey each way, straight down some of the busiest roads in the city. My personal opinion is that we will always have cyclists being killed for various reasons, and although it would probably get me shouted at by friends and family directly affected by a cyclists death, I think number of deaths is at a very reasonable level considering the number of vehicles in London, and journeys made.

The good news is, as a cyclist your survival is generally in your hands. I am armed with good knowledge as a driver and cyclist. I ride extremely defensively and have no problem with taking primary if I think it's necessary. Situational awareness is also the key to uneventful journeys. I think if drivers see this confidence they will be patient and know they are dealing with an experienced cyclist, and give room and time.

I am extremely aware of how lightly some drivers get off after killing cyclists. This is just one more weapon in my armory, which keeps me alert and on my toes.

More cyclists need to stop being lazy and open your eyes when riding. Be more aware and proactive. It will save your life.

grayze

790 posts

168 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
jimbop1 said:
I remember that as well. Good example!

Surely no one would think that she should have gone to prison purely to deter others?
It depends, if he dressed head to foot in black, painted his bike matt black, took off the legally required reflectives from pedals, wheels and behind him you could argue he was trying to commit suicide and she is the unwitting victim of him.



skoff

1,387 posts

234 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
jimbop1 said:
Bradley1500 said:
It should be handled on a case by case basis.

I remember watching a Police, Camera, Action type program where a young women hit a cyclist on an unlit A road. The cyclist was in dark clothing with no reflectives or lights. The women thought she had hit an animal or similar so didn't stop, it was only when her father saw the damage and thought it would be a good idea to report the incident to the Police they found out she had hit and killed the cyclist. A very sad mistake but one which could of been avoided if the cyclist had taken the appropriate precautions to make himself visible!
I remember that as well. Good example!

Surely no one would think that she should have gone to prison purely to deter others?
Probably not any reasonable person, but if you are a politician in an election year...

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
danjama said:
I commute by cycle to work most days. 8 mile journey each way, straight down some of the busiest roads in the city. My personal opinion is that we will always have cyclists being killed for various reasons, and although it would probably get me shouted at by friends and family directly affected by a cyclists death, I think number of deaths is at a very reasonable level considering the number of vehicles in London, and journeys made.

The good news is, as a cyclist your survival is generally in your hands. I am armed with good knowledge as a driver and cyclist. I ride extremely defensively and have no problem with taking primary if I think it's necessary. Situational awareness is also the key to uneventful journeys. I think if drivers see this confidence they will be patient and know they are dealing with an experienced cyclist, and give room and time.

I am extremely aware of how lightly some drivers get off after killing cyclists. This is just one more weapon in my armory, which keeps me alert and on my toes.

More cyclists need to stop being lazy and open your eyes when riding. Be more aware and proactive. It will save your life.
Stop being so sensible and reasonable.

My cycle commute isn't as long as yours or on such busy roads but I do drive lots of different stuff on roads and can see things from a variety or perspectives. Most people don't understand what it is like to cycle, or drive a lorry or a bus or ride a motorbike so have no idea how their actions effect those that do. Most days I get put at risk by others, but it's no good me getting my knickers is a twist about it, if I don't take responsibility for my safety it's hard to expect others to do so.

For the most part the roads are safe enough.

danjama

5,728 posts

142 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
Stop being so sensible and reasonable.

My cycle commute isn't as long as yours or on such busy roads but I do drive lots of different stuff on roads and can see things from a variety or perspectives. Most people don't understand what it is like to cycle, or drive a lorry or a bus or ride a motorbike so have no idea how their actions effect those that do. Most days I get put at risk by others, but it's no good me getting my knickers is a twist about it, if I don't take responsibility for my safety it's hard to expect others to do so.

For the most part the roads are safe enough.
Yes, exactly. And that's a good point. There is a cycle training place near my office, and they get a lot of HGV/taxi drivers in for training, to experience the shoe on the other foot. There should be more of this. I sometimes drive vans of various sizes for work. Not long journeys at all, but I remember when I first started how much I learnt about life 'in the cab'. It changed everything for me, as a cyclist.

grayze

790 posts

168 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
You have to do as much as you can on a cycle to reduce the risk to yourself, but I think the OP is suggesting that a driver that kills a cyclist because they are distracted or not driving with care and attention should be counselled and not punished.

complete rubbish.

Laser Sag

2,860 posts

243 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Interesting little video of Lee's cycle to work in that article, steady state cycling until it is apparent he can arrive alongside the parked car at around the same time as the car coming the other way if he accelerates a bit which he then does. What looks to be a reasonable gap left for him as well. Not saying the driver is right or wrong to go past the parked vehicle but if Lee had eased up a little then there would have been no incident at all but that wouldn't be good for the camera or is that the cynic in me.
There are good and bad drivers and good and bad cyclists, wife was recently hit in the rear while stationary by a good cyclist apparently, well according to him it was the other car drivers around them in 3 lanes of stop start traffic that caused the problem.